[ceph-users] Re: cephfs-top doesn't work

Do you have mounted clients? How many clients do you have? Please see: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55197 On 19/04/22 01:13, Vladimir Brik wrote: Does anybody know why cephfs-top may only display header lines (date, client types, metric names) but no actual data? When I run it, cephfs-top

[ceph-users] Ceph Multisite Cloud Sync Module

I am trying to get the Ceph Multisite Clous Sync module working with Amazon S3. The docs are not clear on how the sync module is actually configured. I just want a POC of the most simple config. Can anyone share the config and radosgw-admin commands that were invoked to create a simple sync

[ceph-users] Re: cephfs-top doesn't work

On 4/19/22 3:43 AM, Vladimir Brik wrote: Does anybody know why cephfs-top may only display header lines (date, client types, metric names) but no actual data? When I run it, cephfs-top consumes quite a bit of the CPU and generates quite a bit of network traffic, but it doesn't actually

[ceph-users] which cdn tool for rgw in production

Hi guys, I want to add a CDN service for my rgws, and provide a url without authentication. I have a test on openresty, but I'm not sure it it suitable for production. Which tool do you use in production? Thanks. ___ ceph-users mailing list --

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

On 4/18/22 16:45, Neha Ojha wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 12:34 PM Ilya Dryomov wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:04 PM David Galloway wrote: The LRC is upgraded but the same mgr did crash during the upgrade. It is running now despite the crash. Adam suspects it's due to earlier

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 12:34 PM Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:04 PM David Galloway wrote: > > > > The LRC is upgraded but the same mgr did crash during the upgrade. It is > > running now despite the crash. Adam suspects it's due to earlier breakage. > > > >

[ceph-users] Aggressive Bluestore Compression Mode for client data only?

I would like to use bluestore compression (probably zstd level 3) to compress my clients data unless the incompressible hint is set (aggressive mode) but I do no want to expose myself to the bug experienced in this Cern talk (Ceph bug of the year) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4HUR00oCGo where

[ceph-users] Re: Is it normal Ceph reports "Degraded data redundancy" in normal use?

If you mark an osd "out" but not down / you dont stop the daemon do the PGs go remapped or do they go degraded then as well? Respectfully, *Wes Dillingham* w...@wesdillingham.com LinkedIn On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:15 AM Kai Stian Olstad wrote: >

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:04 PM David Galloway wrote: > > The LRC is upgraded but the same mgr did crash during the upgrade. It is > running now despite the crash. Adam suspects it's due to earlier breakage. > > https://pastebin.com/NWzzsNgk src/mgr/DaemonServer.cc: 2946: FAILED

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

The LRC is upgraded but the same mgr did crash during the upgrade.  It is running now despite the crash.  Adam suspects it's due to earlier breakage. https://pastebin.com/NWzzsNgk Shall I start the build after https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45932

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

A patch to revert the pids-limit change has been opened https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45932. We created a build with that patch put on top of the current quincy branch and are upgrading the LRC to it now. So far it seems to be going alright. All the mgr, mon and crash daemons have been

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 3:10 AM David Galloway wrote: > > For transparency and posterity's sake... > > I tried upgrading the LRC and the first two mgrs upgraded fine but > reesi004 threw an error. > > Apr 14 22:54:36 reesi004 podman[2042265]: 2022-04-14 22:54:36.210874346 > + UTC