Sending again, to you directly as well, I’m unsure if my email was rejected on
the mailing list.
—
Hello,
There is no such usage collected today, see [1] and [2] – where [2] is a
specification on how
one community member wanted to implement the feature but nobody has put in the
work yet
that
Hello,
There is no such usage collected today, see [1] and [2] – where [2] is a
specification on how
one community member wanted to implement the feature but nobody has put in the
work yet
that we know of.
[1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/47342
[2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/54972
Hello,
This is expected behaviour as misplaced ratio in balancer is set to 5%.
See older threads about that [1].
[1]
https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/thread/D6VWHYKJGJQ22P2OGW5RZAHBWXB354S4/
Best regards
> On 9 Mar 2024, at 09:38, Michel Niyoyita wrote:
>
> Hello
Hello,
You can use the RGW admin API (enabled_apis=admin,….) and get the usage from
there.
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/adminops/
Best regards
> On 15 Feb 2024, at 06:48, asad.siddi...@rapidcompute.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on Ceph object storage and would
ion if a threshold of tombstones is hit within a sliding
window during iteration.
Best regards
> On 2 Feb 2024, at 11:29, Tobias Urdin wrote:
>
> Shiming in here, just so that it’s indexed in archives.
>
> We’ve have a lot of issues with tombstones when running RGW usage logging and
>
Shiming in here, just so that it’s indexed in archives.
We’ve have a lot of issues with tombstones when running RGW usage logging and
when we
trim those the Ceph OSD hosting that usage.X object will basically kill the OSD
performance
due to the tombstones being so many, restarting the OSD
Hello Yuri,
On the RGW side I would very much like to get this [1] patch in that release
that is already merged in reef [2] and pacific [3].
Perhaps Casey can approve and merge that so you can bring it into your
testing.
Thanks!
[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/53414
[2]
Hello,
That was solved in 16.2.11 in tracker [1] with fix [2].
Best regards
Tobias
[1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55765
[2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47194/commits
> On 12 Sep 2023, at 05:29, Louis Koo wrote:
>
> radosgw crash again with:
> ceph version 16.2.10
That’s a major misinterpretation of how it actually is in reality.
Sorry just had to state that, obviously not the proper mailing list to discuss
it on.
Best regards
Tobias
> On 4 Aug 2023, at 09:25, Jens Galsgaard wrote:
>
> Your are right.
>
> Centos stream is alpha
> Fedora is beta
>
, Casey Bodley wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:22 AM Tobias Urdin
mailto:tobias.ur...@binero.com>> wrote:
Hello Casey,
Thanks for the information!
Can you please confirm that this is only an issue when using
“rgw_crypt_default_encryption_key”
config opt that says “testin
Hello Casey,
Thanks for the information!
Can you please confirm that this is only an issue when using
“rgw_crypt_default_encryption_key”
config opt that says “testing only” in the documentation [1] to enable
encryption and not when using
Barbican or Vault as KMS or using SSE-C with the S3 API?
...@k0ste.ru>> wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Sep 2022, at 10:38, Tobias Urdin
mailto:tobias.ur...@binero.com>> wrote:
Why not scaleout HAproxy by adding multiple ones and use a TCP load balancer
in front of multiple HAproxy instances or use BGP ECMP routing directly to split
load between mult
Hello Casey,
Barbican is probably still in use by a lot of people, including ourselves.
We would love to still have this support in there, perhaps we can find a way
forward keeping
that support if we can involve some more people in the maintenance process.
I proposed to bump the version for
uld probably require that buckets
> track these per-storage-class stats as well
>
>>
>> From: Casey Bodley
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 7:50:12 PM
>> To: Tobias Urdin
>> Cc: ceph-users@ceph.io
>> Subject: [cep
Hello,
Is anybody else hitting the ceph_assert(is_primary()) in
PrimaryLogPG::on_local_recover [1] recurringly when upgrading?
I’ve been hit with this multiple times now on Octopus and it just very
annoying, both on 15.2.11 and 15.2.15
Been trying to collect as much information as possible
Hello,
Did you follow the fix/recommendation when applying patches as per
the documentation in the CVE security post [1] ?
Best regards
[1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/security/CVE-2021-20288/
> On 9 Aug 2021, at 02:26, Richard Bade wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
> I had a similar issue last week
about
the error.
From: Tobias Urdin
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 2:52:57 PM
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Cannot create issue in bugtracker
Hello,
Is it only me that's getting Internal error when trying to create issues in the
bugtracker for some
Hello,
Is it only me that's getting Internal error when trying to create issues in the
bugtracker for some day or two?
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/new
Best regards
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email
Hello,
A little off topic, but there isn't much activity in the Puppet community
around Ceph so if it's something you'd like to share, if the module is
reusable, I'm sure there is people that could have good use of it.
The "official" ceph/puppet-ceph is dead which was forked out of the
Hello,
Anybody have any feedback or ways they have resolved this issue?
Best regards
From: Tobias Urdin
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 3:01:49 PM
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Storage class usage stats
Hello,
I've been trying to understand
Hello,
I've been trying to understand if there is any way to get usage information
based on storage classes for buckets.
Since there is no information available from the "radosgw-admin bucket stats"
commands nor any other endpoint I
tried to browse the source code but couldn't find any
We did this as well, pretty much the same as Wido.
We had a fiber connection with good latency between the locations.
We installed a virtual monitor in the destination datacenter to always
keep quorum then we
simply moved one node at a time after setting noout.
When we took a node up on the
about this behavior.
Thanks,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:54 AM Tobias Urdin mailto:tobias.ur...@binero.se>> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to wrap my head around how having a multi-site (two
zones in
one zonegroup) with multiple placement
targets but only wanting to replicat
Hello,
I'm trying to wrap my head around how having a multi-site (two zones in
one zonegroup) with multiple placement
targets but only wanting to replicate some placement targets would work.
Can you setup a zonegroup with two zones and it would only replicate the
placement targets that the
24 matches
Mail list logo
