On 29/03/2024 04:18, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
Hi Loïc, I'm surprised by that high storage amount, my "default" pool uses only
~512 Bytes per file, not ~32 KiB like in your pool. That's a 64x difference!
(See also my other response to the original post I just sent.)
I'm using Ceph 16.2.1.
>
On 31/01/2024 20:13, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 5:03 AM Dietmar Rieder
wrote:
Hello,
I have a question regarding the default pool of a cephfs.
According to the docs it is recommended to use a fast ssd replicated
pool as default pool for cephfs. I'm asking what are the
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 5:03 AM Dietmar Rieder
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a question regarding the default pool of a cephfs.
>
> According to the docs it is recommended to use a fast ssd replicated
> pool as default pool for cephfs. I'm asking what are the space
> requirements for storing the
The docs recommend a fast SSD pool for the CephFS *metadata*, but the
default data pool can be more flexible. The backtraces are relatively
small — it's an encoded version of the path an inode is located at,
plus the RADOS hobject, which is probably more of the space usage. So
it should fit fine
