you seem to forget that all of those are well sourced, with full links
to the original sources, like the newspapers, or actual recordings of
the wing nut.
You know Sam, stuff called facts. Oh pardon I forgot, Facts have a Librul bias.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
Eich stepped down because he was out of step with the people he was
supposed to be leading. He's a strong technical lead and deeply
committed to open source software.
When it comes to being an employee (especially in a big company) I
This is some good stuff.
Actually, a smaller version of this would be awesome. Does it exist?
á§
On 6 April 2014 13:54, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
http://cheezburger.com/59813377
quit fooling around and take my money!
Nothing at the rightwingwatch is sourced. It's n opinion blog.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
you seem to forget that all of those are well sourced, with full links
to the original sources, like the newspapers, or actual recordings of
the wing
Anyone that thinks a supporter of traditional marriage is a homophobe is a
useful idiot used as a tool by radicals. It's a sad day in this country
when people are forced into a way of thought. Free thinking be damned. At
this rate, in 10 years there will be orgies in the Senate and those
He was forced to step down because one dating company with a lot of traffic
banned the use of Firefox. That makes you so proud doesn't it.
.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone that thinks a supporter of traditional marriage is a homophobe is a
useful idiot used as a tool by radicals.
They may or may not be homophobes. Doesn't matter. They support a separate
but equal system, and that makes them
It's not separate but equal. Two different things, two different names. Why
call them homosexuals, isn't that separate but equal in your book?
I strongly support free will and the ability to have a public opinion
without having ones life destroyed because you don't agree. I do not like
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sam wrote:
Anyone that thinks a supporter of traditional marriage is a homophobe is
a useful idiot used as a tool by radicals. It's a sad day in this country
when people are forced into a way of thought. Free thinking be damned.
At this rate, in 10 years
so the direct quotes with sources don't exist. That's almost as stupid
as saying that facts have a librul bias.
Lets take this post:
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/louie-gohmert-hails-mississippi-anti-gay-law-attacks-intolerant-gays
Its on Congress critter Louis Gohmert, a well know
CSPAN is going to get a lot more interesting. I could get behind the idea
of requiring periodic lion feedings during fillibusters but I'm not sure
about the orgies. I love me a good orgy, but given the demographics of the
Senate, I'm not sure that it would make for very compelling entertainment.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not separate but equal. Two different things, two different names. Why
call them homosexuals, isn't that separate but equal in your book?
Why is it two different things???
Homosexual is an adjective describing a
Dunno about that. Given how many of the Senators look, would you
really be wanting to see all that old wrinkled fat skin?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
CSPAN is going to get a lot more interesting. I could get behind the idea
of requiring periodic
WOW, you associate use of the term traditional marriage with racism? Are
you really that simple? That tells me you know nothing of the suffering of
blacks to think so little of it.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM,
Stay focused Larry.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
so the direct quotes with sources don't exist. That's almost as stupid
as saying that facts have a librul bias.
Lets take this post:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:15 AM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is it two different things???
Homosexual is an adjective describing a person. A homosexual and
heterosexual are still people. A homosexual marriage and a heterosexual
marriage are still both a marriage
And marriage
Wrong Sam...he was forced out by pressure from his employees. OKCupid had
very little effect. They didn't ban the use of it...they put up a page that
came up if you were using FF and then let you continue on if you wanted to.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Sam
No...he is comparing the same idiots who tried to block interracial marriage
with the idiots like you who are trying to ban gay marriage. Same
hate...same morons.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 10:19 AM
To: cf-community
Subject:
Yes...Obama changed his position on gay marriage and in case you forgot, he
came out publically for it. He has always been very friendly to the LGBT
community, even when he, personally, was still against gay marriage.
-Original Message-
From: C. Hatton Humphrey
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Sam wrote:
WOW, you associate use of the term traditional marriage with racism?
Are you really that simple? That tells me you know nothing of the suffering
of blacks to think so little of it.
Nope, it's the overall attitude that I associate with heinous
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:15 AM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is it two different things???
Homosexual is an adjective describing a person. A homosexual and
heterosexual are still people. A homosexual marriage
You obviously don't have your facts correct.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Wrong Sam...he was forced out by pressure from his employees. OKCupid had
very little effect. They didn't ban the use of it...they put up a page
that
came
The same idiots that blocked interracial marriage are the ones forcing this
issue. They hated blacks then, now they hate hetros.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
No...he is comparing the same idiots who tried to block interracial
He changed his opinion because he was told to. You were duped.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Yes...Obama changed his position on gay marriage and in case you forgot, he
came out publically for it. He has always been very friendly
But it's not discrimination. It's a false issue you've been tricked into.
But keep fighting the good cause. You're needed.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Sam wrote:
WOW, you associate use of the term
The spelling?
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:58 AM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:15 AM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is it two different things???
Homosexual is an
If they are identical, why do you need two of them??
Seriously, you've confused me now. How are they different? And if they are
not different, why two civil unions?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
The spelling?
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:58 AM, GMoney
I'll use your words:
homosexual is an adjective describing a civil union. A homosexual and
heterosexual are still civil unions. A homosexual civil union and a
heterosexual civil union are still both a civil union
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
If they
Soyou do want legalized gay marriage in all states? (Marriage being
just another name for a civil union)
then what are we arguing about?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll use your words:
homosexual is an adjective describing a civil union. A
LOL Sam...are you really that stupid? Not discrimination? LOL
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 11:41 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Mozilla CEO Eich resigns after controversy - CNET
But it's not discrimination. It's a false
Marriage is a classification of civil union
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:08 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Soyou do want legalized gay marriage in all states? (Marriage being
just another name for a civil union)
then what are we arguing about?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM,
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Sam wrote:
But it's not discrimination. It's a false issue you've been tricked into.
But keep fighting the good cause. You're needed.
I have no qualms about my position on this being recorded for all of
history. I suspect you feel the same.
I doubt we will
Cam,
Discrimination would be to not want gays to exist, not want them to come
out, not want them to be in committed relations or not want them to have
civil unions. This is not the case.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
LOL Sam...are you
A classification granted by WHOM?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Marriage is a classification of civil union
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:08 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Soyou do want legalized gay marriage in all states? (Marriage being
On TV in the 60's during bedroom scenes, separate beds and pajamas. Now in
prime-time you can see the woman going under covers to give head. How
horribly backwards and hate filled Father Knows Best was.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr
Time
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:32 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
A classification granted by WHOM?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Marriage is a classification of civil union
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:08 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Sam wrote:
Discrimination would be to not want gays to exist, not want them to
come out, not want them to be in committed relations or not want them to
have civil unions. This is not the case.
So, only certain rights qualify in your mind. Okay, you are
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Sam wrote:
On TV in the 60's during bedroom scenes, separate beds and pajamas. Now
in prime-time you can see the woman going under covers to give head.
How horribly backwards and hate filled Father Knows Best was.
Totally random unrelated example? I'm going
I am seriously confused.
The legal contract called a civil union, which considers two people
legally joined as a couple, frequently referred to as marriage.do you
wish this same contract to be granted to hetero and homo couples, or not
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Sam
In other words you cannot answer with anything in support of your bias.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Stay focused Larry.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
so the direct quotes with sources don't exist.
Same as your example.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Sam wrote:
On TV in the 60's during bedroom scenes, separate beds and pajamas. Now
in prime-time you can see the woman going under covers to give head.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Sam wrote:
You need to look up rights.
Sharpening my picture even more.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
I know.
Civil Union should definitly be the same contract. The sub-category,
marriage, is a separate issue.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:41 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
I am seriously confused.
The legal contract called a civil union, which considers two people
legally joined as a
No, it means you're changing the topic again. Focus on this thread.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
In other words you cannot answer with anything in support of your bias.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Stay
You need to look up rights.
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Sam wrote:
Discrimination would be to not want gays to exist, not want them to
come out, not want them to be in committed relations or not want them
I think i got it.
Marriage is a sub category of a civil union.and it should only apply to
civil unions that are hetero, even though, both marriage civil unions and
non-marriage civil unions, would have identical rights.
Is that your stance?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Sam
Marriage is more of a description.
It's another word for hetro to describe a civil union.
Yes, all civil unions should be treated equally.
Let's follow through. If the marriage would apply to gay and straight
unions won't the world start saying Gay Marriage or Straight marriage
to be specific.
Question: Why do you see the need to go through all of this word wrangling,
when you personally feel that both heterosexuals and homosexuals who enter
into the EXACT SAME CONTRACT, should be treated the same?
Why go to all these lengths to pacify people who are uncomfortable sharing
a simple
I throw that question back at you. What difference does it make?
.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:28 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Question: Why do you see the need to go through all of this word wrangling,
when you personally feel that both heterosexuals and homosexuals who enter
into
To people who feel like they are being denigrated for reasons they cannot
help, it apparently makes quite a difference.
There are two groups on either side of that question, Sam:
Group 1: People who were born homosexual
Group 2: People who don't want to SHARE A WORD with people born homosexual
50 matches
Mail list logo
