Dear all,
I have a request about the "integral heat content" names. The
*"**integral_of_sea_water_potential_temperature_wrt_depth_expressed_as_heat_content**"*
will be added to the next release, from what I understand. It's very
good timing for me as we, at CMEMS, are now processing files
Dear Alison cc Steve, Paul
Sorry for slow response. I've read Steve's edited version and I agree with
your and Steve's proposals. Thanks. Changing all the integral_of_X_wrt_Y to
integration_wrt_Y_of_X will make them more readable, I think, and it's a
neater construction. In fact people
Dear Jonathan, Stephen and Paul,
Paul has reminded me that these names are still awaiting completion. Thanks to
Jonathan and Stephen for commenting on the names during the earlier discussion.
I think these names (35 in total) are all very close to agreement and if
possible I'd like to add them
Dear Steve
> As defined in Table L1 of Griffies et al, the following diagnostics are XYT
> dimensioned (see entries 1,2,3 in Table L1):
>
> integral_wrt_depth_of_product_of_sea_water_density_and_potential_temperature
>
Dear Alison
Thank you for your careful analysis and comments, and thanks to Steve for
responding quickly. I'm sorry, I'm colour-blind in emails (since I read and
write them in plain text).
> > c. sea_water_salinity_at_sea_floor (1e-3)
> > 'Salinity adjacent to the ocean bottom (at the deepest
Dear Stephen, Jonathan, Paul, All,
I have reviewed all the OMIP physics names that were proposed originally by
Jonathan and Stephen
(http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2015/057961.html). The
proposals didn't receive any comments on the mailing list so I have looked at
them all
