Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

2016-05-04 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Thanks Chris, An excellent point, and the word 'vertical' should be added to the definitions. I was wondering about including highest one-third in the Hs definition, but there are alternatives and I tried to find an understandable form of words covering all and failed dismally. Maybe

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

2016-05-04 Thread Chris Barker
just a little note: - *sea_surface_wave_significant_height*Wave height is defined as the distance from a wave trough to the following wave crest. > > NOTE: the is the VERTICAL distance -- difference in elevation between the bottom of a trough and top of the crest. this wording sounds a lot like a

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

2016-05-04 Thread Elodie Fernandez
Hi all, Thanks a lot for your feedback. I think Roy's "4-steps" work plan is a great idea to keep things manageable. Thanks Roy! We, Marta and I, agree with your suggestions Roy and Jonathan. So, to summarize, for height parameters, we have: - *sea_surface_wave_significant_height* Wave height

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

2016-05-04 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Dear Jonathan, Many thanks for your constructive response. As always your Standard Name grammar is more precise than mine and so I am happy with your suggestions providing Elodie and her colleagues have no problems. Cheers, Roy. -Original Message- From: CF-metadata

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

2016-05-04 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Roy Thanks for redefining "wave height". That helps me understand! > - sea_surface_wave_average_height Could this be "mean" instead of "average"? > - sea_surface_wave_height_of_highest_tenth Given the definition, shouldn't this be sea_surface_wave_mean_height_of_highest_tenth > -

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

2016-05-04 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Hello again, Here are my suggestions for your other six height definitions (I've already made a suggestion for Hs) - sea_surface_wave_maximum_height Wave height is defined as the distance from a wave trough to the following wave crest. The maximum wave height is the greatest trough to crest

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

2016-05-04 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Dear Jonathan, Thank you for drawing my attention to what is a glaring error in the existing wave height Standard Name definitions. I've no idea how I failed to spot it before - trying to fit CF into spare moments leading to too much scan reading or perhaps they were set up before I became