benshi001 wrote:
> For now only the pre-condition is added, the `evalFflush` function is missing.
I have also added `evalFflush`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Luhaocong wrote:
> Should this only apply in C23 mode? Standard behavior until C23 is that
> `_Float16` promotes to `double`. What about C++?
It seems clang never support default argument promotions for _Float16, as
described in
https://github.com/benshi001 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74296
>From 65ce18117f99056aafcf58151b64f4243f4d5e26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 15:51:20 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Support `fflush` in the StreamChecker
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74570.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.h (+5)
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineFormatter.cpp
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74570
None
>From a37925ae51d95e91d32ec50bc39a9b6e5b13c571 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 23:31:28 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format][NFC] Refactor getting first/last non-comment
of
minglotus-6 wrote:
Three tests failed on the windows build-bot
(https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/builds/20392#018c3c8d-d4fd-41f7-b456-b1a4ded6dc61).
Two (Transforms/PGOProfile/vtable_profile.ll and
tools/llvm-profdata/vtable-value-prof-basic.test) of these three passed
bwendling wrote:
Okay. I should have fixed that issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73730
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/antangelo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74265
>From a8e841657b9816a78f6eb1520c8513454fe0008b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Abbatangelo
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 21:19:13 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Exclude non-template classes when checking
cor3ntin wrote:
Can you add a release note indicating
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/74016 was fixed?
Otherwise LGTM.
If you wanted to make a follow up {R to rename `isPure` to `isPureVirtual`, i
think that might be helpful (to avoid confusion with the `gnu::pure` attribute)
minglotus-6 wrote:
Using the same added ICP test, profile matching on local-linkage
`_ZL7callee0v` using `clang++ -v -fuse-ld=lld -O2
-fprofile-use=thinlto_icall_prom.profdata ` , as
[this](https://gist.github.com/minglotus-6/11817ba645c6b12cd7116f41bfb1185e)
pgo-instr-use output shows.
https://github.com/rikhuijzer closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bwendling wrote:
Could you add the .c and .sh files? I'll try to recreate it on my end though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73730
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -300,12 +316,8 @@ getIRPGONameForGlobalObject(const GlobalObject ,
GlobalValue::LinkageTypes Linkage,
StringRef FileName) {
SmallString<64> Name;
- if (llvm::GlobalValue::isLocalLinkage(Linkage)) {
-
MaskRay wrote:
Sorry for causing you trouble but I think removing special cases from these
`static const char *const XXXTriples[]` is intentional and we shall not add
special cases for vendors. See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/72256#issuecomment-1842148887
MaskRay wrote:
Add @shafik who authors
https://gist.github.com/shafik/848ae25ee209f698763cffee272a58f8 ("Although
clang allows these flags it apparently does not actually implement the
warnings")
> [*] I implemented what turned into GCC's level=1 way back when.
Cool!
FWIW the GCC doc is
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O0 -Wstrict-aliasing -S -o %t -verify=quiet
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -Wstrict-aliasing=0 -S -o %t -verify=quiet
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -Wno-strict-aliasing -S -o %t -verify=quiet
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -Wstrict-aliasing=1 -S -o
https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74553
>From 9be87da42e48895cf23d90a3ed735b7a36b1ccb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 04:51:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Add separate C++23 extension flag for attrs on
lambda
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Utkarsh Saxena (usx95)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74553.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td (+3-1)
- (modified)
@@ -1,14 +1,49 @@
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s -o - | llc -filetype=asm | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -filetype=asm -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu %s -o - | FileCheck
%s --check-prefixes=ELF
MaskRay wrote:
omit `-filetype=asm`
https://github.com/usx95 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74553
None
>From 9be87da42e48895cf23d90a3ed735b7a36b1ccb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 04:51:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add separate C++23 extension flag for attrs on lambda
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=arm64-unknown-linux-gnu %s -filetype=asm -o - | FileCheck
%s --check-prefixes=ELF
MaskRay wrote:
Omit `-filetype=asm` (convention).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73686
@@ -1809,6 +1814,255 @@ void AArch64AsmPrinter::emitInstruction(const
MachineInstr *MI) {
EmitToStreamer(*OutStreamer, TmpInst);
}
+void AArch64AsmPrinter::emitGlobalIFunc(Module , const GlobalIFunc ) {
+ if (!TM.getTargetTriple().isOSBinFormatMachO())
+return
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74475
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pirama-arumuga-nainar wrote:
cc: @nico
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70251
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -106,6 +126,210 @@ Error XCOFFDumper::dumpSections(ArrayRef Sections) {
return Error::success();
}
+Error XCOFFDumper::dumpFileAuxSym(XCOFFYAML::Symbol ,
+ const XCOFFSymbolRef ) {
+ for (uint8_t I = 1; I <= Sym.NumberOfAuxEntries; ++I)
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74230
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Aiden Grossman
Date: 2023-12-05T19:19:21-08:00
New Revision: aeaae5311b8d4bbcfe7ef5cff722ea36b038c0ad
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aeaae5311b8d4bbcfe7ef5cff722ea36b038c0ad
DIFF:
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ registerAllGPUToLLVMIRTranslations(DialectRegistry )
{
registerLLVMDialectTranslation(registry);
registerNVVMDialectTranslation(registry);
registerROCDLDialectTranslation(registry);
+ registerSPIRVDialectTranslation(registry);
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+//===- SPIRVToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp - Translate SPIRV to LLVM IR
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/inclyc commented:
Also please add release notes to let users know what has been changed :)
See: `clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -918,6 +918,9 @@ def Wdeprecated : Flag<["-"], "Wdeprecated">,
Group,
HelpText<"Enable warnings for deprecated constructs and define
__DEPRECATED">;
def Wno_deprecated : Flag<["-"], "Wno-deprecated">, Group,
Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option]>;
+def
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat -Wformat-signedness
%s
+
+int printf(const char *restrict format, ...);
+int scanf(const char * restrict, ...);
+
+void test_printf_bool(_Bool x)
+{
+printf("%d", x); // no-warning
+
@@ -11815,6 +11815,18 @@ isArithmeticArgumentPromotion(Sema , const
ImplicitCastExpr *ICE) {
S.Context.getFloatingTypeOrder(From, To) < 0;
}
+static clang::analyze_format_string::ArgType::MatchKind
inclyc wrote:
```suggestion
static
MaskRay wrote:
> when only have f extension but no d extension
This can be simplified to "w/ f extension but w/o d extension"
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// Check target CPUs are correctly passed.
+·// Check target CPUs are correctly passed.
MaskRay wrote:
Stray `.`? Please fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/benshi001 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74291
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ben Shi
Date: 2023-12-06T10:26:30+08:00
New Revision: 4699789249e6945c46cdbecd1fee493cbe553c66
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4699789249e6945c46cdbecd1fee493cbe553c66
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4699789249e6945c46cdbecd1fee493cbe553c66.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74230
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2023-12-05T18:10:39-08:00
New Revision: 8a686716e360157ad5726560cc5ea61be647893c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8a686716e360157ad5726560cc5ea61be647893c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8a686716e360157ad5726560cc5ea61be647893c.diff
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74230
>From ae4097b53b90e31802be0be5c8a81fb74c81efc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:46:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-format] Add "three dot" diff option to
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2023-12-05T18:07:22-08:00
New Revision: 7a49c30b830471c39d09d71a6a617f2a7f3e711c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7a49c30b830471c39d09d71a6a617f2a7f3e711c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7a49c30b830471c39d09d71a6a617f2a7f3e711c.diff
nathanchance wrote:
For what it's worth, I see a new crash on the latest version of this PR, in
case it is not known.
```
$ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm64 LLVM=1 mrproper allmodconfig
net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.o
clang: /home/nathan/cbl/src/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:3342:
static
@@ -57,6 +57,16 @@ global variable or function should be in after translation.
let Heading = "section, __declspec(allocate)";
}
+def CodeModelDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatVariable;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``model`` attribute allows you to use a different
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
>From e3863873ab817dacf8680763bb42d91f005fe5ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This patch adds a
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74230
>From ae4097b53b90e31802be0be5c8a81fb74c81efc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:46:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-format] Add "three dot" diff option to
https://github.com/kovdan01 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72821
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kovdan01 wrote:
OK, thanks for such a detailed explanation! Closing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72821 as not needed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1809,6 +1814,255 @@ void AArch64AsmPrinter::emitInstruction(const
MachineInstr *MI) {
EmitToStreamer(*OutStreamer, TmpInst);
}
+void AArch64AsmPrinter::emitGlobalIFunc(Module , const GlobalIFunc ) {
+ if (!TM.getTargetTriple().isOSBinFormatMachO())
+return
https://github.com/4vtomat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69000
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
4vtomat wrote:
moved to the new [one](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74213)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69000
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaskRay wrote:
When the target triple is aarch64 and `-arch ` is specified, e.g.
`--target=aarch64 -arch arm64e`, there is currently no warning/error, because
`clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/AArch64.cpp` claims `OPT_arch` in quite a few
places.
We can safely remove these references now that
kovdan01 wrote:
@MaskRay Unfortunately, the case I was initially trying to fix still has a
problem after applying this patch. Consider
`LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=aarch64-linux-musl`. In such a case, running `clang
-arch arm64e -c test.c -###` will show us `"-triple"
Lewuathe wrote:
@joker-eph Thank you. That gets clearer to me!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bwendling wrote:
The `__bdos` stuff is only a subset of the bounds checking code so we should
focus on that.
It's still messier than that, since it's not always going to be a pointer
directly to the FAM (e.g. p->a.b.c.array[index]), but I'll give it a shot. I
don't think it's going to be any
https://github.com/ahmedbougacha edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73686
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1809,6 +1814,255 @@ void AArch64AsmPrinter::emitInstruction(const
MachineInstr *MI) {
EmitToStreamer(*OutStreamer, TmpInst);
}
+void AArch64AsmPrinter::emitGlobalIFunc(Module , const GlobalIFunc ) {
+ if (!TM.getTargetTriple().isOSBinFormatMachO())
+return
@@ -144,7 +144,12 @@ bool CallLowering::lowerCall(MachineIRBuilder ,
const CallBase ,
// Try looking through a bitcast from one function type to another.
// Commonly happens with calls to objc_msgSend().
const Value *CalleeV = CB.getCalledOperand()->stripPointerCasts();
@@ -882,8 +882,11 @@ class AsmPrinter : public MachineFunctionPass {
GCMetadataPrinter *getOrCreateGCPrinter(GCStrategy );
void emitGlobalAlias(Module , const GlobalAlias );
- void emitGlobalIFunc(Module , const GlobalIFunc );
+protected:
+ virtual void
Author: Jan Svoboda
Date: 2023-12-05T15:52:57-08:00
New Revision: bb0f162b3acfab3146807ab1e01946596d9921f9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb0f162b3acfab3146807ab1e01946596d9921f9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb0f162b3acfab3146807ab1e01946596d9921f9.diff
rjmccall wrote:
This seems conservatively correct, yeah. My reading is that we could also use
the underlying type as a parent type for the TBAA metadata: enums are
compatible with their underlying type, but two enums with the same underlying
type are not compatible with each other. But this
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67839
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jan Svoboda
Date: 2023-12-05T15:35:55-08:00
New Revision: 07157db81d4421ced9fcf9a2002255c2a3a80d49
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/07157db81d4421ced9fcf9a2002255c2a3a80d49
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/07157db81d4421ced9fcf9a2002255c2a3a80d49.diff
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67839
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/elizabethandrews closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71706
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: elizabethandrews
Date: 2023-12-05T18:11:53-05:00
New Revision: cee5b8777fa98312b05bf8aa81554910a8f867c5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cee5b8777fa98312b05bf8aa81554910a8f867c5
DIFF:
@@ -157,6 +157,25 @@
#define LLVM_DEPRECATED(MSG, FIX) [[deprecated(MSG)]]
#endif
+// clang-format off
+#if defined(__clang__) || defined(__GNUC__)
+#define LLVM_IGNORE_DEPRECATIONS_OF_DECLARATIONS_BEGIN
\
jansvoboda11 wrote:
Maybe
adrian-prantl wrote:
SGTM, maybe wait one more day for @JDevlieghere to chime in.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73067
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
Trying to discuss both __bdos and the array bounds sanitizer changes in the
same review is making things confusing to discuss. It seems like they have
significant differences.
For array bounds sanitizer, take your example:
```
struct s {
struct s *p;
int count;
bjosv wrote:
Updated the check to be derived from the original check instead of an alias.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73119
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/bjosv updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73119
From 91cf412abcfd231ab399c3e44c6a9bc14109537c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Svensson?=
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:30:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Add check
bwendling wrote:
> I mean, the base case should be "return nullptr", and you should only
> explicitly list out expressions you know we need to handle. We shouldn't need
> to explicitly mention VisitUnaryPostDec etc.
The expression can be arbitrarily complex. For instance this:
```
struct s {
jroelofs wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73686
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
> > And ideally, the recursive visit should list those expressions explicitly,
> > instead aborting on ones we know are bad.
>
> I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're talking about here. The whole point
> of the recursive visit is to find a suitable base pointer. If
rupprecht wrote:
> Is this a performance optimization or a function al change?
Neither. This should only affect tests, and the set of tests we skip/mark as
xfail should not change, we just generally know about it earlier in the test
setup.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73067
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
LGTM w/ minor comments
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74512
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8395,10 +8395,11 @@ void Sema::CheckShadow(NamedDecl *D, NamedDecl
*ShadowedDecl,
unsigned WarningDiag = diag::warn_decl_shadow;
SourceLocation CaptureLoc;
- if (isa(D) && isa(ShadowedDecl) && NewDC &&
- isa(NewDC)) {
+ if (isa(D) && NewDC && isa(NewDC)) {
https://github.com/shafik edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74512
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -179,3 +179,21 @@ void f() {
#endif
}
}
+
+namespace GH71976 {
+struct A {
+ int b = 5;
+ int foo() {
+return [b = b]() { return b; }();
shafik wrote:
```suggestion
return [b = b]() { return b; }(); // no diagnostic, init-capture does not
shadow
@@ -179,3 +179,21 @@ void f() {
#endif
}
}
+
+namespace GH71976 {
+struct A {
+ int b = 5;
+ int foo() {
+return [b = b]() { return b; }();
+ }
+};
+
+struct B {
+ int a;
+ void foo() {
+auto b = [a = this->a] {
shafik wrote:
```suggestion
https://github.com/fabianmcg closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/charmitro updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74510
>From 5582cfacf106a7c00912fcef0d116d6fa58e064b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charalampos Mitrodimas
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:46:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Disable missing definition warning on pure
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff d6fbd96e5eaf3e8acbf1b43dce7a311352907567
1140e0094137614ad9917276f5324cbea4f2e0f9 --
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -verify %s
+
+template
+concept C = true;
+
+class non_temp {
+template T>
+friend void f();
+
+non_temp();
+};
+
+template T>
+void f() {
+auto v = non_temp();
+}
+
+template
+class temp {
+template T>
+
https://github.com/charmitro edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74510
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4952,7 +4952,8 @@ void Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
std::make_pair(Function, PointOfInstantiation));
} else if (TSK == TSK_ImplicitInstantiation) {
if (AtEndOfTU && !getDiagnostics().hasErrorOccurred() &&
-
https://github.com/charmitro updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74510
>From 1140e0094137614ad9917276f5324cbea4f2e0f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charalampos Mitrodimas
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:46:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Disable missing definition warning on pure
bwendling wrote:
> And ideally, the recursive visit should list those expressions explicitly,
> instead aborting on ones we know are bad.
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're talking about here. The whole point
of the recursive visit is to find a suitable base pointer. If we run across
https://github.com/minglotus-6 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74008
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
banach-space wrote:
> Are you going to add an entry to the [Release
> Notes](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/flang/docs/ReleaseNotes.md)?
Once this change lands, yes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74377
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/minglotus-6 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74008
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -300,12 +316,8 @@ getIRPGONameForGlobalObject(const GlobalObject ,
GlobalValue::LinkageTypes Linkage,
StringRef FileName) {
SmallString<64> Name;
- if (llvm::GlobalValue::isLocalLinkage(Linkage)) {
-
@@ -702,6 +708,8 @@ serializeValueProfDataFrom(ValueProfRecordClosure *Closure,
#define INSTR_PROF_COVMAP_COMMON __llvm_covmap
#define INSTR_PROF_COVFUN_COMMON __llvm_covfun
#define INSTR_PROF_ORDERFILE_COMMON __llvm_orderfile
ZequanWu wrote:
Done.
ZequanWu wrote:
> Can you break up all the changes to tests that replace
> `-debug-info-correlate` with `--profile-correlate=debug-info` into a separate
> PR to reduce the size of this PR?
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69493
___
https://github.com/nvoorhies closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73717
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71706
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
If you do need a map for something, I'd prefer to make it as narrow as
possible. For example, I can imagine you could need to specifically look up
the corresponding allocation for a CompoundLiteralExpr; that might make sense.
I don't think we should need to look up
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67839
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 416 matches
Mail list logo
