vgvassilev wrote:
> @dwblaikie do you have any memory of what caused regressions on the last try
> in the first place? Do we happen to do more work for compiles with many files
> because we accidentally push some computations further down the dependency
> tree and have to duplicate it instead
martinboehme wrote:
Build failure is merely a clang-format failure in a file not touched by this PR
(clang/docs/HLSL/FunctionCalls.rst).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78163
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/BinVerse closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78085
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kelbon edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
The failing buildkite is merely a clang-format failure for a file not touched
by this PR (clang/docs/HLSL/FunctionCalls.rst).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78127
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/kelbon edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -11889,6 +11889,13 @@ bool Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration(Scope *S,
FunctionDecl *NewFD,
NewFD->setInvalidDecl();
}
+ if (NewFD->hasAttr() || NewFD->hasAttr()) {
+if (isa(NewFD))
+ Diag(NewFD->getLocation(), diag::warn_pure_attr_on_cxx_constructor);
+
@@ -10,112 +10,70 @@ on:
- 'llvmorg-*'
jobs:
- release-tasks:
-permissions:
- contents: write # To upload assets to release.
+ validate-tag:
+name: Validate Tag
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.repository == 'llvm/llvm-project'
+outputs:
+
https://github.com/kelbon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78200
>From b080d04eb30254502ccd5d59d76b5197db1fa88d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kelbon Nik
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:24:34 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] add warning and test
---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+name: Release Lit
+
+permissions:
+ contents: read
+
+on:
+ workflow_dispatch:
+inputs:
+ release-version:
+description: 'Release Version'
+required: true
+type: string
+
+ workflow_call:
+inputs:
+ release-version:
+
@@ -10,112 +10,70 @@ on:
- 'llvmorg-*'
jobs:
- release-tasks:
-permissions:
- contents: write # To upload assets to release.
+ validate-tag:
+name: Validate Tag
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.repository == 'llvm/llvm-project'
+outputs:
+
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-01-16T08:25:21+01:00
New Revision: af1463d403182720ae0e3fab07634817dd0f41be
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af1463d403182720ae0e3fab07634817dd0f41be
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af1463d403182720ae0e3fab07634817dd0f41be.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+name: Release Lit
+
+permissions:
+ contents: read
+
+on:
+ workflow_dispatch:
+inputs:
+ release-version:
+description: 'Release Version'
+required: true
+type: string
+
+ workflow_call:
+inputs:
+ release-version:
+
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM.
There is open issue for performance of this check.
Consider mentioning this in release notes as some generic performance
improvment.
Do you have any benchmarks ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78231
https://github.com/Bigcheese updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77711
>From d3e928fc5b725cb3e484a8cfd50fa23c26f7eb22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Spencer
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:58:59 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Driver] Don't ignore -gmodules .gch files
A
Yunzezhu94 wrote:
> > @MaskRay Wasn't it you that mentioned this?
>
> Yes. I hoped that we could deprecated `DEFAULT_SYSROOT`:
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D158218 , but the relative `DEFAULT_SYSROOT` does
> not have a good replacement.
I think since relative DEFAULT_SYSROOT still works,
@@ -26,21 +35,26 @@ jobs:
prepare:
name: Prepare to build binaries
runs-on: ubuntu-22.04
-if: github.repository == 'llvm/llvm-project'
outputs:
- release-version: ${{ steps.validate-tag.outputs.release-version }}
- flags: ${{
@@ -10,112 +10,70 @@ on:
- 'llvmorg-*'
jobs:
- release-tasks:
-permissions:
- contents: write # To upload assets to release.
+ validate-tag:
+name: Validate Tag
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.repository == 'llvm/llvm-project'
+outputs:
+
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+name: Release Lit
+
+permissions:
+ contents: read
+
+on:
+ workflow_dispatch:
+inputs:
+ release-version:
+description: 'Release Version'
+required: true
+type: string
+
+ workflow_call:
+inputs:
+ release-version:
+
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 commented:
No issues on my end. Definitely seems to be an improvement over what was there
before.
It would be nice to unify the documentation test action and the documentation
release action (at least somewhat), but it doesn't seem like they're
particularly
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69523
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mjklemm wrote:
> In a long run, I still think that we need to get rid of `Fortran_main`.
> Perhaps, for the minimal, we can rename it to remove `Fortran` in the name to
> make people think that it is not required (by the users) to do any linking
> for Fortran code.
I'd agree to that! The
https://github.com/arichardson commented:
Overall this looks great to me, very happy to see reduced duplication between
clang and llvm.
It would be great if we could just emit the atomic IR in all cases but
unfortunately non-power-of-two sizes result in a verifier error. We could
probably
@@ -975,6 +981,61 @@ void StreamChecker::evalFprintf(const FnDescription *Desc,
C.addTransition(StateFailed);
}
+void StreamChecker::evalFscanf(const FnDescription *Desc, const CallEvent
,
+ CheckerContext ) const {
+ ProgramStateRef State =
@@ -173,16 +173,30 @@ StringRef getEquivalentBoolLiteralForExpr(const Expr
*Expression,
return {};
}
+bool needsSpacePrefix(SourceLocation Loc, ASTContext ) {
+ SourceRange PrefixRange(Loc.getLocWithOffset(-1), Loc);
+ StringRef SpaceBeforeStmtStr = Lexer::getSourceText(
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+//===--- ChainedComparisonCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+//===--- ChainedComparisonCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+//===--- ChainedComparisonCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+//===--- ChainedComparisonCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77711
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-01-15T21:25:51-08:00
New Revision: 481fd41aaa343e2ee2c86c2444fbc2e5ad1f3831
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/481fd41aaa343e2ee2c86c2444fbc2e5ad1f3831
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/481fd41aaa343e2ee2c86c2444fbc2e5ad1f3831.diff
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-01-15T21:25:48-08:00
New Revision: d34ac450a74657f03e15dd6776b406d1f31e054a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d34ac450a74657f03e15dd6776b406d1f31e054a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d34ac450a74657f03e15dd6776b406d1f31e054a.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
`UnusedUsingDeclsCheck::removeFromFoundDecls` will be called with high
frequency. At current time it will check every `Context`.
This patch adds a cache to reduce algorithm complexity.
---
Full
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78231
`UnusedUsingDeclsCheck::removeFromFoundDecls` will be called with high
frequency. At current time it will check every `Context`.
This patch adds a cache to reduce algorithm complexity.
>From
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libunwind
Author: Heejin Ahn (aheejin)
Changes
This should have been ``, meaning neither SjLj nor Wasm uses this
file.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78230.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) libunwind/src/libunwind.cpp
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
#include
#endif
-#if !defined(__USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS__)
+#if !defined(__USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS__) || !defined(__USING_WASM_EXCEPTIONS__)
aheejin wrote:
Sorry, fixed in #78230.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73196
https://github.com/aheejin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78230
This should have been `&&`, meaning neither SjLj nor Wasm uses this file.
>From 9ddfd0446342ea3c257b5d1d104f957a83c01e3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heejin Ahn
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 20:06:48 -0800
Subject:
@@ -2696,6 +2696,25 @@ def int_amdgcn_udot8 :
ImmArg>, ImmArg>, ImmArg>]
>;
+// f32 %r = llvm.amdgcn.dot4.f32.type_a.type_b (v4type_a (as i32) %a, v4type_b
(as i32) %b, f32 %c)
+// %r = %a[0] * %b[0] + %a[1] * %b[1] + %a[2] * %b[2] + %a[3] * %b[3] + %c
+class
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
LGTM after more detailed summary provided.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78159
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
shafik wrote:
Can you please provide a more detailed summary, since these are usually what
goes in the git log. It should describe the cause and the approach of the fix.
It is also helpful for reviewers as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78159
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-01-16T11:32:10+08:00
New Revision: 1b6c1a3bd73be4dd904230c637d65810cf3334cd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b6c1a3bd73be4dd904230c637d65810cf3334cd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b6c1a3bd73be4dd904230c637d65810cf3334cd.diff
sethp wrote:
oh, @tbaederr I see you've done some overlapping work over in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68288 : I'll make time to review that
and see what ought to happen to dovetail these patches.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74775
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// From https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/77953
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -emit-module-interface %t/a.cppm -o %t/a.pcm
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fmodule-file=a=%t/a.pcm
https://github.com/ecnelises updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66040
>From ebaafdd6d45bb62b1847e60df627dfd96971a22c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiu Chaofan
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:39:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [PowerPC] Check value uses in ValueBit tracking
---
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > @ilya-biryukov any chance you/your folks could test this change for
> > performance implications in google? It's especially helpful to CERN, but
> > the last iteration of this direction had some regressions that stalled out
> > progress on that version a few years ago,
@@ -437,6 +442,16 @@ namespace {
MostDerivedArraySize = 2;
MostDerivedPathLength = Entries.size();
}
+void addVectorUnchecked(QualType EltTy, uint64_t Size, uint64_t Idx) {
+ Entries.push_back(PathEntry::ArrayIndex(Idx));
+
+ // This is
@@ -144,6 +144,9 @@ sections with improvements to Clang's support for those
languages.
C++ Language Changes
+- Allow single element access of vector object to be constant expression.
+ Supports the `V.xyzw` syntax and other tidbits as seen in OpenCL.
https://github.com/sethp commented:
Thanks for looking into this! I was surprised to find that `clang` didn't
support element accesses in a `constexpr` context, I'm glad you've put the
effort in to get it working!
Two minor notes below, otherwise LGTM.
https://github.com/sethp edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72607
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -11889,6 +11889,13 @@ bool Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration(Scope *S,
FunctionDecl *NewFD,
NewFD->setInvalidDecl();
}
+ if (NewFD->hasAttr() || NewFD->hasAttr()) {
+if (isa(NewFD))
+ Diag(NewFD->getLocation(), diag::warn_pure_attr_on_cxx_constructor);
+
@@ -692,6 +692,13 @@ def warn_maybe_falloff_nonvoid_function : Warning<
def warn_falloff_nonvoid_function : Warning<
"non-void function does not return a value">,
InGroup;
+def warn_pure_attr_on_cxx_constructor : Warning<
+ "constructor cannot be 'pure' (undefined
@@ -11889,6 +11889,13 @@ bool Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration(Scope *S,
FunctionDecl *NewFD,
NewFD->setInvalidDecl();
}
+ if (NewFD->hasAttr() || NewFD->hasAttr()) {
+if (isa(NewFD))
+ Diag(NewFD->getLocation(), diag::warn_pure_attr_on_cxx_constructor);
+
@@ -15845,8 +15845,10 @@ void Sema::CheckCoroutineWrapper(FunctionDecl *FD) {
RecordDecl *RD = FD->getReturnType()->getAsRecordDecl();
if (!RD || !RD->getUnderlyingDecl()->hasAttr())
return;
- // Allow `get_return_object()`.
- if (FD->getDeclName().isIdentifier() &&
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath , Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
https://github.com/hstk30-hw closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77185
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: SihangZhu
Date: 2024-01-16T10:13:11+08:00
New Revision: 58b33d0301a36900fc641b4b0e110b683064bab8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58b33d0301a36900fc641b4b0e110b683064bab8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58b33d0301a36900fc641b4b0e110b683064bab8.diff
@@ -1149,9 +1171,11 @@ struct Proxy {
// Calling swap(Proxy{}, Proxy{}) would fail (pass prvalues)
// Compare operators are defined for the convenience of the tests
- friend constexpr bool operator==(const Proxy&, const Proxy&)
-requires (std::equality_comparable &&
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM then.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77465
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -1172,6 +1198,22 @@ struct Proxy {
requires std::three_way_comparable_with, std::decay_t> {
return lhs.data <=> rhs.data;
}
+
+ // Needed to allow certain types to be weakly_incremental
+ constexpr Proxy& operator++()
+requires(HasPreIncrementOp)
+ {
+
https://github.com/EugeneZelenko edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ struct CounterMappingRegion {
unsigned ExpandedFileID, unsigned LineStart,
unsigned ColumnStart, unsigned LineEnd,
unsigned ColumnEnd, RegionKind Kind)
- : MCDCParams(MCDCParams),
@@ -722,6 +739,24 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
return I->second;
}
+ /// Return the ID of the next condition when the given condition is True.
+ MCDCConditionID getNextIfTrueCondID(const Expr *Cond) const {
+auto I =
owenca wrote:
> I think this is kind of too specific.
+1.
> Also I agree with [#78166
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78166#issuecomment-1892311219)
> that `WhitespaceSensitiveMacros` should be used.
I don't think we should require that the option be used.
@@ -4842,7 +4842,7 @@ bool TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBefore(const
AnnotatedLine ,
return true;
}
if (Left.is(TT_UnaryOperator)) {
-if (Right.isNot(tok::l_paren)) {
+if (!Right.isOneOf(tok::r_paren, tok::l_paren, tok::exclaim)) {
owenca
@@ -746,21 +781,52 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
// assign that ID to its LHS node. Its RHS will receive a new ID.
if (CondIDs.contains(CodeGenFunction::stripCond(E))) {
// If Stmt has an ID, assign its ID to LHS
-
MaxEW707 wrote:
> It's not ready, but I have a draft for a much more general attribute: #78071
I was playing around with your draft PR and I do prefer your solution over mine.
It will even help to cleanup my custom `xmmintrin.h` header that we have to
reduce include times from SSE headers.
alanzhao1 wrote:
> I believe the approach here is not sufficient and we have a current PR in
> progress: #76976
>
> we also need codegen work to implement this.
Correct - here are some examples that will cause this to fail:
```cpp
void foo(int n) {
new int[n](1, 2);
}
```
```cpp
void
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78139
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-01-16T00:56:42+01:00
New Revision: c58bc24fcf678c55b0bf522be89eff070507a005
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c58bc24fcf678c55b0bf522be89eff070507a005
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c58bc24fcf678c55b0bf522be89eff070507a005.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-use-std-min-max %t
+
+constexpr int myConstexprMin(int a, int b) {
+ return a < b ? a : b;
+}
+
+constexpr int myConstexprMax(int a, int b) {
+ return a > b ? a : b;
+}
+
+int bar(int x, int y) {
+ return x < y ? x :
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-use-std-min-max %t
+
+constexpr int myConstexprMin(int a, int b) {
+ return a < b ? a : b;
+}
+
+constexpr int myConstexprMax(int a, int b) {
+ return a > b ? a : b;
+}
+
+int bar(int x, int y) {
+ return x < y ? x :
https://github.com/felix642 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/felix642 requested changes to this pull request.
Overall looks good, but left a few comments regarding some nits that I think
should be addressed before landing this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+//===--- AvoidNestedConditionalOperatorCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --===//
HerrCai0907 wrote:
fixed in 10602c2b4a662872d1aaeda1dbc58e5d6f613fda
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78022
___
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2024-01-16T07:49:07+08:00
New Revision: 10602c2b4a662872d1aaeda1dbc58e5d6f613fda
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10602c2b4a662872d1aaeda1dbc58e5d6f613fda
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10602c2b4a662872d1aaeda1dbc58e5d6f613fda.diff
https://github.com/shafik commented:
I believe the approach here is not sufficient and we have a current PR in
progress: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76976
we also need codegen work to implement this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78201
cor3ntin wrote:
> Is this a potentially breaking change since we have expanded what types are
> considered literals and already existing code may observe this fix?
Some expression will become constant expressions and presumably that can be
SFINAE upon, but given that this is a DR, I don't
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78195
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -208,3 +208,54 @@ namespace dr2565 { // dr2565: 16 open
#endif
}
+
+
+namespace dr2598 { // dr2598: 18
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+struct NonLiteral {
+NonLiteral();
+};
+
+struct anonymous1 {
+union {} a;
+};
+static_assert(__is_literal(anonymous1), "");
+
@@ -1383,6 +1383,34 @@ void CXXRecordDecl::addedMember(Decl *D) {
}
}
+bool CXXRecordDecl::isLiteral() const {
+ const LangOptions = getLangOpts();
+ if (!(LangOpts.CPlusPlus20 ? hasConstexprDestructor()
+ : hasTrivialDestructor()))
+
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78195
>From f354ca458c1fa3cebb375f756f1a87fcf0586c3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:09:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Implement CWG2598: Union of non-literal types
A
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77943
>From 537d283288f555c2bb7cff90aee89fe9b18f08b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:31:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-tid]fix modernize-use-auto incorrect fix hints for
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Mostly looks good but I would like a second set of eyes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78195
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -208,3 +208,54 @@ namespace dr2565 { // dr2565: 16 open
#endif
}
+
+
+namespace dr2598 { // dr2598: 18
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+struct NonLiteral {
+NonLiteral();
+};
+
+struct anonymous1 {
+union {} a;
+};
+static_assert(__is_literal(anonymous1), "");
+
@@ -208,3 +208,54 @@ namespace dr2565 { // dr2565: 16 open
#endif
}
+
+
+namespace dr2598 { // dr2598: 18
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+struct NonLiteral {
+NonLiteral();
+};
+
+struct anonymous1 {
+union {} a;
+};
+static_assert(__is_literal(anonymous1), "");
+
@@ -208,3 +208,54 @@ namespace dr2565 { // dr2565: 16 open
#endif
}
+
+
+namespace dr2598 { // dr2598: 18
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+struct NonLiteral {
+NonLiteral();
+};
+
+struct anonymous1 {
+union {} a;
+};
+static_assert(__is_literal(anonymous1), "");
+
@@ -1383,6 +1383,34 @@ void CXXRecordDecl::addedMember(Decl *D) {
}
}
+bool CXXRecordDecl::isLiteral() const {
+ const LangOptions = getLangOpts();
+ if (!(LangOpts.CPlusPlus20 ? hasConstexprDestructor()
+ : hasTrivialDestructor()))
+
https://github.com/shafik edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78195
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
11happy wrote:
@PiotrZSL also added the include check.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/11happy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
>From 1883d987b2f83adaef05fdb47ae25c7b06582a64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 11happy
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:02:46 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] Add readability check to suggest replacement of
conditional
https://github.com/lhames approved this pull request.
Ok -- local testing seems to confirm that this is the right fix. We need to add
a testcase for this API, but that can happen as a follow-up.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77185
___
luporl wrote:
> > If the compiler is built with `DEFAULT_SYSROOT`, the `-isysroot` option is
> > ignored. Is that the expected behavior? My local MacOS build (with
> > `-DDEFAULT_SYSROOT="$(xcrun --show-sdk-path)"`) has `isysroot.f90` failed.
>
> I expected `-isysroot` to override
mariusz-sikora-at-amd wrote:
> Missing UniformityAnalysis test for these
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76224
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mariusz-sikora-at-amd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76224
>From 89b94cc98e188142cff11d58f27fe6c25183b376 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vang Thao
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 11:58:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [AMDGPU][GFX12] Add Atomic cond_sub_u32
---
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Is this a potentially breaking change since we have expanded what types are
considered literals and already existing code may observe this fix?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78195
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76090
>From 7c31c8bc2acf60bd50cb6d63944ee8d4946b9638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 21:33:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [VPlan] Replace VPRecieOrVPValue with VP2VP recipe
simplification.
1 - 100 of 503 matches
Mail list logo
