[clang] [serialization] no transitive decl change (PR #91914)

https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91914 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [serialization] no transitive decl change (PR #91914)

https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91914 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [serialization] no transitive decl change (PR #91914)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9) Changes Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 Motivation Example The motivation of the patch series is that, for a module interface unit `X`, when the dependent modules of `X`

[clang] [serialization] no transitive decl change (PR #91914)

https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 ready_for_review https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91914 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [serialization] no transitive decl change (PR #91914)

https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91914 Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 Motivation Example The motivation of the patch series is that, for a module interface unit `X`, when the dependent modules of `X` changes,

[clang] [clang][Interp] Member Pointers (PR #91303)

https://github.com/tbaederr updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91303 >From a1cefd4b17bb540568472e753b7d4684a99bdda9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?= Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:42:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Memberpointers ---

[clang] [clang][Interp] Member Pointers (PR #91303)

https://github.com/tbaederr updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91303 >From c8bddc0573c62f288314b4407ba500dcc9b84425 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?= Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:42:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Memberpointers ---

[clang] [clang-format] Fix FormatToken::isSimpleTypeSpecifier() (PR #91712)

dyung wrote: Hi @owenca, this change is causing a test failure in the sanitizer bot (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/43303), that is still failing as of your most recent fix de641e2 (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/43334). Can you please revert if you need

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [flang] [lld] [llvm] [mlir] [polly] [test]: fix filecheck annotation typos (PR #91854)

@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ # RUN: ld.lld -Ttext 0x201000 %t.o -o %t4 # RUN: llvm-readelf -S -l %t4 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=USER3 # USER3: .text PROGBITS 00201000 001000 01 -# USER3-NEX: .rodata PROGBITS 00202000 002000 08 -# USER3-NEX: .aw

[clang] Reland "[Win32][ELF] Make CodeView a DebugInfoFormat only for COFF format", second try (PR #88245)

phoebewang wrote: Ping? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88245 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

https://github.com/JoverZhang edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

JoverZhang wrote: > Please add an entry to the release notes here: > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/502e77df1fc4aa859db6709e14e93af6207e4dc4/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst?plain=1#L176 > > > do note that the entries are sorted by their check names. > Otherwise looks

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

https://github.com/JoverZhang updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588 >From 19bf94ca3c093a6904482eab599f8366cad1384e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jover Zhang Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:56:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return ---

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

https://github.com/JoverZhang updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588 >From 19bf94ca3c093a6904482eab599f8366cad1384e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jover Zhang Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:56:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return ---

[clang] de641e2 - [clang-format] Fix buildbot failures

Author: Owen Pan Date: 2024-05-12T18:56:18-07:00 New Revision: de641e289269061f8bdb138bb5c50e27ef4b354f URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de641e289269061f8bdb138bb5c50e27ef4b354f DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de641e289269061f8bdb138bb5c50e27ef4b354f.diff

[clang] 626025a - Revert "[clang-format] Fix buildbot failures"

Author: Owen Pan Date: 2024-05-12T18:35:35-07:00 New Revision: 626025ac7796b70cde9fc0fd4f688c3441949d04 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/626025ac7796b70cde9fc0fd4f688c3441949d04 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/626025ac7796b70cde9fc0fd4f688c3441949d04.diff

[clang] [clang] visit constraint of NTTP (PR #91842)

https://github.com/jcsxky updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842 >From 0ebdcec675c39b26b8bee1a8b07c12fae2c58523 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: huqizhi Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 14:04:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [clang] visit constraint of NTTP --- clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

[clang] [clang] visit constraint of NTTP (PR #91842)

https://github.com/jcsxky updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842 >From 4133001711b82c93e057e1bd05476c5d052d597f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: huqizhi Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 14:04:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [clang] visit constraint of NTTP --- clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

[clang] 5bde801 - [X86][vectorcall] Pass built types byval when xmm0~6 exhausted (#91846)

Author: Phoebe Wang Date: 2024-05-13T08:31:49+08:00 New Revision: 5bde8017a1109128d011510dcf4ba79140a224fe URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5bde8017a1109128d011510dcf4ba79140a224fe DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5bde8017a1109128d011510dcf4ba79140a224fe.diff

[clang] [X86][vectorcall] Pass built types byval when xmm0~6 exhausted (PR #91846)

https://github.com/phoebewang closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91846 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial. (PR #91876)

https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876 >From a4b877b240ede15260f08fcb4a4622dd45a13d0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryosuke Niwa Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 20:18:52 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial. ---

[clang] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial. (PR #91876)

https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876 >From a4b877b240ede15260f08fcb4a4622dd45a13d0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryosuke Niwa Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 20:18:52 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial. ---

[clang] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial. (PR #91876)

rniwa wrote: > You should add a test for mutually recursive functions. I suspect something > like this doesn't work: > > ```c++ > int non_trivial(); > int f(bool b) { return g(!b) + non_trivial(); } > int g(bool b) { return b ? f(b) : 1; } > > getFieldTrivial().f(true); //

[clang] [CodeGen] Revert "Generate assume loads only with -fstrict-vtable-pointers" (PR #91900)

https://github.com/AtariDreams updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91900 >From d2e06b957cada08371131874219973c7cbd9b196 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rose Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 16:45:07 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] [CodeGen] Revert "Generate assume loads only with

[clang] [CodeGen] Revert "Generate assume loads only with -fstrict-vtable-pointers" (PR #91900)

https://github.com/AtariDreams edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91900 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [CodeGen] Revert "Generate assume loads only with -fstrict-vtable-pointers" (PR #91900)

https://github.com/AtariDreams updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91900 >From 74e4d18ffe6efed565a6bd736eb7e289e7ede73b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rose Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 16:45:07 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] [CodeGen] Revert "Generate assume loads only with

[clang] [ARM][clang] Fix warning for VFP function calls from interrupts. (PR #91870)

chrisnc wrote: I'd like to also address #47815, but I wasn't able to find the right path to answer "is this M-profile" from `TargetInfo`. Would appreciate any suggestions on that. I think it may require `dynamic_cast`-ing the `TargetInfo` to an `ARMTargetInfo`, and then change one of the

[clang] [CodeGen] Revert "Generate assume loads only with -fstrict-vtable-pointers" (PR #91900)

https://github.com/AtariDreams edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91900 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Revert "[CodeGen] Emit vtable assumptions without requiring -fstrict-vtable-pointers" (PR #91900)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: AtariDreams (AtariDreams) Changes This was supposed to be a temporary measure, but unfortunately as things tend to go in software development, temporary measures become permanent. In the 9 years since then, we have greatly improved the

[clang] Revert "[CodeGen] Emit vtable assumptions without requiring -fstrict-vtable-pointers" (PR #91900)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen Author: AtariDreams (AtariDreams) Changes This was supposed to be a temporary measure, but unfortunately as things tend to go in software development, temporary measures become permanent. In the 9 years since then, we have greatly

[clang] Revert "[CodeGen] Emit vtable assumptions without requiring -fstrict-vtable-pointers" (PR #91900)

https://github.com/AtariDreams created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91900 This was supposed to be a temporary measure, but unfortunately as things tend to go in software development, temporary measures become permanent. In the 9 years since then, we have greatly improved the way

[clang] [ARM][clang] Fix warning for VFP function calls from interrupts. (PR #91870)

https://github.com/chrisnc edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91870 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [ARM][clang] Fix warning for VFP function calls from interrupts. (PR #91870)

https://github.com/chrisnc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91870 >From b72b63c51b1859e1a7e792eda20549ef93c8d6c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Copeland Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 00:15:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [ARM][clang] Fix warning for VFP function calls from

[clang-tools-extra] [flang] [lld] [llvm] Use StringRef::operator== instead of StringRef::equals (NFC) (PR #91864)

https://github.com/kuhar approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91864 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [flang] [lld] [llvm] Use StringRef::operator== instead of StringRef::equals (NFC) (PR #91864)

https://github.com/aaupov approved this pull request. BOLT changes LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91864 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang] Add attribute for consteval builtins; Declare constexpr builtins as constexpr in C++ (PR #91894)

MitalAshok wrote: Currently, GCC's behaviour for builtin function redeclarations is to just ignore `constexpr`: . This is slightly stricter, allowing non-`constexpr` redeclarations for `constexpr` builtins but still disallowing `constexpr` declarations for

[clang] [Clang] Add __builtin_is_within_lifetime to implement P2641R4's std::is_within_lifetime (PR #91895)

MitalAshok wrote: This is on top of #91894 [P2641R4](https://wg21.link/P2641R4) Currently, this doesn't strictly check "whose complete object's lifetime began within `E`". A bunch of the static_asserts I have for objects under construction should be ill-formed instead of false, but some of

[clang] [Clang] Add __builtin_is_within_lifetime to implement P2641R4's std::is_within_lifetime (PR #91895)

github-actions[bot] wrote: :warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: You can test this locally with the following command: ``bash git-clang-format --diff 17daa204feadf9c28fc13b7daa69c3cbe865b238 253f58f0e34bc6dedbbfe17f68cfe9baa3a9146f --

[clang] [Clang] Add __builtin_is_within_lifetime to implement P2641R4's std::is_within_lifetime (PR #91895)

https://github.com/MitalAshok created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91895 None >From 56aed689dc5825fc5bacc6dfdff58ee0eaf71f82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mital Ashok Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 19:48:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Add attribute for consteval builtins; Declare

[clang] [Clang] Add attribute for consteval builtins; Declare constexpr builtins as constexpr in C++ (PR #91894)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok) Changes Also support redeclaring now-constexpr builtins without constexpr --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91894.diff 6 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/Builtins.h

[clang] [Clang] Add attribute for consteval builtins; Declare constexpr builtins as constexpr in C++ (PR #91894)

https://github.com/MitalAshok created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91894 Also support redeclaring now-constexpr builtins without constexpr >From 56aed689dc5825fc5bacc6dfdff58ee0eaf71f82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mital Ashok Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 19:48:24 +0100 Subject:

[clang] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial. (PR #91876)

MitalAshok wrote: You should add a test for mutually recursive functions. I suspect something like this doesn't work: ```c++ int non_trivial(); int f(bool b) { return g(!b) + non_trivial(); } int g(bool b) { return b ? f(b) : 1; } getFieldTrivial().f(true); //

[clang] [llvm] [BPF] Fix linking issues in static map initializers (PR #91310)

@@ -1950,8 +1950,22 @@ ConstantLValueEmitter::tryEmitBase(const APValue::LValueBase ) { if (D->hasAttr()) return CGM.GetWeakRefReference(D).getPointer(); -if (auto FD = dyn_cast(D)) - return CGM.GetAddrOfFunction(FD); +if (auto FD = dyn_cast(D)) { +

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Azmat Yusuf (azmat-y) Changes Added a check for unexpanded parameter pack in attribute [[assume]]. Tested it with expected-error statements from clang fronted. This fixes #91232. @Sirraide --- Full diff:

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

github-actions[bot] wrote: Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you,

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

https://github.com/azmat-y created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91893 Added a check for unexpanded parameter pack in attribute [[assume]]. Tested it with expected-error statements from clang fronted. This fixes #91232. @Sirraide >From cbb35bd010f2d46ae70367549a2838841a55aeb7 Mon

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [flang] [lld] [llvm] [mlir] [polly] [test]: fix filecheck annotation typos (PR #91854)

https://github.com/arsenm commented: amdgpu changes lgtm https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91854 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Analyzer][CFG] Correctly handle rebuilt default arg and default init expression (PR #91879)

https://github.com/yronglin updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91879 >From 6969f06f39363deda92d473ec14a08663c71f3b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yronglin Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 14:42:09 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [Analyzer][CFG] Correctly handle rebuilted default arg and default

[clang] 17daa20 - [Clang][CWG1815] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by aggregate initialization using a default member initializer (#87933)

Author: yronglin Date: 2024-05-13T01:16:36+08:00 New Revision: 17daa204feadf9c28fc13b7daa69c3cbe865b238 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/17daa204feadf9c28fc13b7daa69c3cbe865b238 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/17daa204feadf9c28fc13b7daa69c3cbe865b238.diff

[clang] [Clang][CWG1815] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by aggregate initialization using a default member initializer (PR #87933)

https://github.com/yronglin closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [X86][vectorcall] Pass built types byval when xmm0~6 exhausted (PR #91846)

https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request. LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91846 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang][CWG1815] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by aggregate initialization using a default member initializer (PR #87933)

yronglin wrote: > > I'd like to proposal a separate PR for static analyzer. #91879 WDYT? > > That sounds good to me. Thanks for your confirmation! If you don’t have any concerns, I'd like to land this PR. 朗 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933

[clang] [llvm] [X86][Driver] Do not add `-evex512` for `-march=native` when the target doesn't support AVX512 (PR #91694)

FireBurn wrote: No worries, it's fixed now, llvm, nodejs and libreoffice are all compiling fine again https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91694 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

[clang] [Analyzer][CFG] Correctly handle rebuilt default arg and default init expression (PR #91879)

@@ -2433,6 +2429,30 @@ CFGBlock *CFGBuilder::VisitChildren(Stmt *S) { return B; } +CFGBlock *CFGBuilder::VisitCXXDefaultArgExpr(CXXDefaultArgExpr *Arg, + AddStmtChoice asc) { + if (Arg->hasRewrittenInit()) { +if

[clang] Pass QualifiedRenameRule strings by reference to reduce copies (PR #69848)

https://github.com/JoeLoser approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69848 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang][CWG1815] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by aggregate initialization using a default member initializer (PR #87933)

zygoloid wrote: > I'd like to proposal a separate PR for static analyzer. #91879 WDYT? That sounds good to me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

[clang] [Analyzer][CFG] Correctly handle rebuilt default arg and default init expression (PR #91879)

@@ -2433,6 +2429,30 @@ CFGBlock *CFGBuilder::VisitChildren(Stmt *S) { return B; } +CFGBlock *CFGBuilder::VisitCXXDefaultArgExpr(CXXDefaultArgExpr *Arg, + AddStmtChoice asc) { + if (Arg->hasRewrittenInit()) { +if

[clang] [Analyzer][CFG] Correctly handle rebuilt default arg and default init expression (PR #91879)

@@ -2433,6 +2429,30 @@ CFGBlock *CFGBuilder::VisitChildren(Stmt *S) { return B; } +CFGBlock *CFGBuilder::VisitCXXDefaultArgExpr(CXXDefaultArgExpr *Arg, + AddStmtChoice asc) { + if (Arg->hasRewrittenInit()) { +if

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++20 %s readability-else-after-return %t 5chmidti wrote: While `consteval` was added in C++20, `if consteval` is a C++23 feature. Please use `-std=c++23`

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

https://github.com/5chmidti commented: Please add an entry to the release notes here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/502e77df1fc4aa859db6709e14e93af6207e4dc4/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst?plain=1#L176 do note that the entries are sorted by their check names. Otherwise

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

https://github.com/5chmidti edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Disallow VLA type compound literals (PR #91891)

https://github.com/J-MR-T edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91891 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Disallow VLA type compound literals (PR #91891)

https://github.com/J-MR-T edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91891 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Disallow VLA type compound literals (PR #91891)

github-actions[bot] wrote: Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you,

[clang] [clang] Disallow VLA type compound literals (PR #91891)

https://github.com/J-MR-T created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91891 C99-C23 6.5.2.5 says: The type name shall specify an object type or an array of unknown size, but not a variable length array type. Closes issue #89835 . I ran `git clang-format`'ed my changes and ran the clang

[clang] [llvm] [X86][Driver] Do not add `-evex512` for `-march=native` when the target doesn't support AVX512 (PR #91694)

phoebewang wrote: > You'll be probably building 18.1.6 with 18.1.5... and that's when you'll > notice the issue. I'm just about finished building 18.1.5 with your patch. So > hopefully all those issues will be gone. I'll report back Okay... This is a combined problem which I never thought

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [compiler-rt] [lldb] [llvm] [mlir] [openmp] [polly] fix(python): fix comparison to None (PR #91857)

https://github.com/mtrofin approved this pull request. LGTM for the `ctx_profile` part. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [llvm] [X86][Driver] Do not add `-evex512` for `-march=native` when the target doesn't support AVX512 (PR #91694)

FireBurn wrote: You'll be probably building 18.1.6 with 18.1.5... and that's when you'll notice the issue. I'm just about finished building 18.1.5 with your patch. So hopefully all those issues will be gone. I'll report back https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91694

[clang] [llvm] [X86][Driver] Do not add `-evex512` for `-march=native` when the target doesn't support AVX512 (PR #91694)

phoebewang wrote: @FireBurn Sorry, I just noticed #91719. The above comments were based on the issue #91076. I didn't look at the source, but the command line doesn't have an AVX512 option. So I'm assuming the code may related function multi-versioning with manually specified target

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy Author: Jover (JoverZhang) Changes Fixes #91561. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588.diff 2 Files Affected: - (modified)

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

https://github.com/JoverZhang ready_for_review https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

JoverZhang wrote: > Thanks for your patch! Would you be able to add a test case for this please? Yes, thanks. I added a test case. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

https://github.com/JoverZhang updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588 >From 19bf94ca3c093a6904482eab599f8366cad1384e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jover Zhang Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:56:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return ---

[clang-tools-extra] [WIP][clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return (PR #91588)

https://github.com/JoverZhang updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588 >From 19bf94ca3c093a6904482eab599f8366cad1384e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jover Zhang Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:56:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-return ---

[clang] [clang][NFC] Remove class layout scissor (PR #89055)

https://github.com/urnathan closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89055 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] 1d6bf0c - [clang][NFC] Remove class layout scissor (#89055)

Author: Nathan Sidwell Date: 2024-05-12T09:45:00-04:00 New Revision: 1d6bf0ca29322b08e8b50681d440e7182441b025 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d6bf0ca29322b08e8b50681d440e7182441b025 DIFF:

[clang] [llvm] [X86][Driver] Do not add `-evex512` for `-march=native` when the target doesn't support AVX512 (PR #91694)

phoebewang wrote: > @tstellar Can a note be added somewhere about this? Folks upgrading to > llvm-18.1.6 will get errors unless they drop -march=native if they were on > 18.1.5 Although I agree we should add a note, I don't think this patch affects much. The problem only coccurs when

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [flang] [lld] [llvm] [mlir] [polly] [test]: fix filecheck annotation typos (PR #91854)

@@ -109,16 +109,16 @@ CHECK-NEXT: 0x000e: [DW_RLE_offset_pair ]: {{.*}}[0x[[RANGELIST_OFFSET_STAR CHECK-NEXT: 0x0011: [DW_RLE_end_of_list ] CHECK: .debug_names contents: -CHECK-NEX:T Name Index @ 0x0 { -CHECK-NEX:T Header { -CHECK-NEX:T Length: 0x7C

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [flang] [lld] [llvm] [mlir] [polly] [test]: fix filecheck annotation typos (PR #91854)

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ // RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=asm -triple powerpc-ibm-aix-xcoff %s | FileCheck %s -// CHECK-label: .csect .text[PR],2 klensy wrote: actual: `.csect ..text..[PR],5` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91854

[clang] [llvm] [X86][Driver] Do not add `-evex512` for `-march=native` when the target doesn't support AVX512 (PR #91694)

FireBurn wrote: @tstellar Can a note be added somewhere about this? Folks upgrading to llvm-18.1.6 will get errors unless they drop -march=native if they were on 18.1.5 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91694 ___ cfe-commits mailing list

[clang] [llvm] [mlir] [Clang][CodeGen] Start migrating away from assuming the Default AS is 0 (PR #88182)

https://github.com/AlexVlx edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88182 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [llvm] [mlir] [Clang][CodeGen] Start migrating away from assuming the Default AS is 0 (PR #88182)

https://github.com/AlexVlx commented: > Please fix the commit message before you merge; otherwise LGTM For the commit message I was thinking something along the following lines: `At the moment, Clang is rather liberal in assuming that 0 (and by extension unqualified) is always a safe

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [compiler-rt] [lldb] [llvm] [mlir] [openmp] [polly] fix(python): fix comparison to None (PR #91857)

https://github.com/ftynse approved this pull request. LGTM for the MLIR part. Please seek approval from relevant reviewers for all other subprojects. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857 ___ cfe-commits mailing list

[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [flang] [lld] [llvm] [mlir] [polly] [test]: fix filecheck annotation typos (PR #91854)

@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ void foo18() { // CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*a.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [[STRUCT_G]], ptr [[G]], i32 0, i32 0 // CHECK-NEXT: store i32 2, ptr [[A]], align 4 // CHECK-NEXT: [[F:%.*f.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [[STRUCT_G]], ptr [[G]], i32 0, i32 1 -//

[clang] [libclc] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang] `__attribute__((assume))` refactor (PR #84934)

rjodinchr wrote: > > It has nothing to do with OpenMP. The goal was just to get something in the > > llvm IR that we could check for. The `assume` attribute allows us to pass a > > string that we can then check in a llvm pass. > > Could you investigate whether 'annotate' would do what you

[clang] [Clang][CWG1815] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by aggregate initialization using a default member initializer (PR #87933)

yronglin wrote: @zygoloid IIUC, since `CXXDefaultArgExpr` and `CXXDefaultInitExpr` were not added to CFG before and were fall back to constant evaluation in ExprEngine, they were not processed correctly in StaticAnalyzer. In CFG:

[clang] [Analyzer][CFG] Correctly handle rebuilt default arg and default init expression (PR #91879)

github-actions[bot] wrote: :warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: You can test this locally with the following command: ``bash git-clang-format --diff 23fe1fc6b78b7643a801ce3eb53d14b47b1dd0ff 6969f06f39363deda92d473ec14a08663c71f3b1 --

[clang] [Analyzer][CFG] Correctly handle rebuilt default arg and default init expression (PR #91879)

https://github.com/yronglin created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91879 Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933 Clang now support the following: - Extending lifetime of object bound to reference members of aggregates, that are created from default member

[clang] [Clang][CWG1815] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by aggregate initialization using a default member initializer (PR #87933)

https://github.com/yronglin updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933 >From 9fba6da7cb1ffbc7d46b69c6ac0cfd15a89c4b56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yronglin Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 01:38:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by

[clang] [Clang][CWG1815] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by aggregate initialization using a default member initializer (PR #87933)

https://github.com/yronglin updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933 >From 9fba6da7cb1ffbc7d46b69c6ac0cfd15a89c4b56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yronglin Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 01:38:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Support lifetime extension of temporary created by