[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-13 Thread Azmat Yusuf via cfe-commits
azmat-y wrote: Thanks for confirming and also thanks for your help. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91893 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-13 Thread via cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote: > Here are the builds > > Mentioned in emails > [clang-aarch64-sve-vls](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/184/builds/12514) > > [clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/198/builds/9849) > > Others >

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-13 Thread Azmat Yusuf via cfe-commits
azmat-y wrote: Here are the builds Mentioned in emails [clang-aarch64-sve-vls](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/184/builds/12514) [clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/198/builds/9849) Others

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-13 Thread via cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote: > I have received two emails from llvm build bot regarding failed builds, > though the commit shows 8 build fails. That need not be because of this pr specifically; it may just be that someone else did something that caused the build to fail, and the commit for this pr just

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-13 Thread Azmat Yusuf via cfe-commits
azmat-y wrote: It was a pleasure working on this. I have received two emails from llvm build bot regarding failed builds, though the commit shows 8 build fails. How to go about investigating the cause of failures? Can you give me some pointers regarding this. And do the failures means this

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-13 Thread via cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote: @azmat-y Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with a

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-13 Thread via cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91893 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-13 Thread via cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request. LGTM! Thanks for working on this https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91893 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-12 Thread via cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Azmat Yusuf (azmat-y) Changes Added a check for unexpanded parameter pack in attribute [[assume]]. Tested it with expected-error statements from clang fronted. This fixes #91232. @Sirraide --- Full diff:

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-12 Thread via cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote: Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you,

[clang] [Clang] Added check for unexpanded pack in attribute [[assume]] (PR #91893)

2024-05-12 Thread Azmat Yusuf via cfe-commits
https://github.com/azmat-y created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91893 Added a check for unexpanded parameter pack in attribute [[assume]]. Tested it with expected-error statements from clang fronted. This fixes #91232. @Sirraide >From cbb35bd010f2d46ae70367549a2838841a55aeb7 Mon