philnik777 wrote:
Not right now. I think the first thing to do is moving all the builtins to
tablegen before we can make better use of it, which is going to take a while.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
fpetrogalli wrote:
@philnik777 - do you plan to use the TD definitions of the builtins anywhere
else in the compiler?
Francesco
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/michele-scandale edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mikaelholmen wrote:
> @mikaelholmen Thanks. I've fixed the signature in
> [e099e7b](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e099e7b278c774338c7019e38fbbca9ef2c8dd74).
Thanks.
Seems like we're missing testcases though if a bug like that passes lit tests
without errors.
@@ -6571,11 +6571,14 @@ class AtomicExpr : public Expr {
/// \return empty atomic scope model if the atomic op code does not have
/// scope operand.
static std::unique_ptr getScopeModel(AtomicOp Op) {
-if (Op >= AO__opencl_atomic_load && Op <=
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/philnik777 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
