wangpc-pp wrote:
> Do you see any disadvantage to going back to adding a feature for the
> profiles?
Of course not, I will revise this patch tomorrow. Thanks for discussing this!
(I missed the sync-up meeting because I forgot the daylight saving...)
asb wrote:
We discussed again in the sync-up call to try to move this forwards and per a
discussion with @topperc and @preames were wondering if relying on -mattr and a
corresponding feature for the profile might be the better approach after all.
* There's not a lot of instances of this, but I
wangpc-pp wrote:
Gentle ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wangpc-pp wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
>From ec68548a470d6d9032a900a725e95b92691657b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Pengcheng
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:28:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
>From ec68548a470d6d9032a900a725e95b92691657b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Pengcheng
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:28:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
https://github.com/wangpc-pp edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wangpc-pp wrote:
> We discussed this on the sync-up call and @preames very rightly pointed out
> that we should take a step back here...from a user perspective, what does
> specifying a profile via `-mcpu` provide that specifying it via `-march`
> doesn't? We weren't able to answer that in
asb wrote:
We discussed this on the sync-up call and @preames very rightly pointed out
that we should take a step back here...from a user perspective, what does
specifying a profile via `-mcpu` provide that specifying it via `-march`
doesn't? We weren't able to answer that in the call, but
asb wrote:
> > I don't know if we need S-mode profile CPUs.
>
> I lean towards not supporting them since the S extensions don't do anything
> in the compiler except preprocessor defines and ELF attributes, but maybe we
> should put it on the agenda for the sync meeting this week.
My initial
topperc wrote:
> I don't know if we need S-mode profile CPUs.
I lean towards not supporting them since the S extensions don't do anything in
the compiler except preprocessor defines and ELF attributes, but maybe we
should put it on the agenda for the sync meeting this week.
https://github.com/michaelmaitland approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Wang Pengcheng (wangpc-pp)
Changes
As discussed in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76357#discussion_r1518452608,
we may need to add generic CPUs for profiles.
https://github.com/wangpc-pp created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
As discussed in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76357#discussion_r1518452608,
we may need to add generic CPUs for profiles.
I don't know if we need S-mode profile CPUs.
>From
16 matches
Mail list logo