@@ -5387,6 +5387,14 @@ std::string llvm::UpgradeDataLayoutString(StringRef DL,
StringRef TT) {
return Res;
}
+ // AArch64 data layout upgrades.
+ if (T.isAArch64()) {
+// Add "-Fn32"
+if (!DL.contains("-Fn32"))
+ Res.append("-Fn32");
https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90569
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90704.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/UncountedCallArgsChecker.cpp (+10-3)
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90704.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/UncountedCallArgsChecker.cpp (+10-3)
-
https://github.com/rniwa created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90704
None
>From e408befb6422d9063572ddcad2c152eede1b5ca0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:12:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [alpha.webkit.UncountedCallArgsChecker] Ignore methods of WTF
https://github.com/dougsonos edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90702
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5387,6 +5387,14 @@ std::string llvm::UpgradeDataLayoutString(StringRef DL,
StringRef TT) {
return Res;
}
+ // AArch64 data layout upgrades.
+ if (T.isAArch64()) {
+// Add "-Fn32"
+if (!DL.contains("-Fn32"))
+ Res.append("-Fn32");
@@ -5387,6 +5387,14 @@ std::string llvm::UpgradeDataLayoutString(StringRef DL,
StringRef TT) {
return Res;
}
+ // AArch64 data layout upgrades.
+ if (T.isAArch64()) {
+// Add "-Fn32"
+if (!DL.contains("-Fn32"))
+ Res.append("-Fn32");
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
This looks correct.
I'd expect regression tests for the autoupgrade, and a test that clang isn't
generating the alignment markings anymore.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90702
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90702
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90701
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2024-04-30T21:51:45-07:00
New Revision: 3684a38d33d7643fe8c3a870006efa8677ac37f8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3684a38d33d7643fe8c3a870006efa8677ac37f8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3684a38d33d7643fe8c3a870006efa8677ac37f8.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Doug Wyatt (dougsonos)
Changes
This addresses an issue where the explicit alignment of 2 (for C++ ABI reasons)
was being propagated to the back end and causing under-aligned functions (in
special
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/dougsonos created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90702
This addresses an issue where the explicit alignment of 2 (for C++ ABI reasons)
was being propagated to the back end and causing under-aligned functions (in
special sections). (#90358)
This is an alternate
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#90180
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90701.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/UncountedCallArgsChecker.cpp
https://github.com/rniwa created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90701
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#90180
>From 54ff88ab2b46e0ba82cc59077c6d3b367eecd497 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:28:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH]
rniwa wrote:
Oh, looks like I broke tests. Reverting.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90180
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rniwa wrote:
> Ok am I reading this right: this is about testing code that lives directly in
> namespace `std::` but somehow still lives in your project right? Such as your
> custom modifications to standard classes, various overloads and
> specializations of standard things.
No, this is
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90180
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2024-04-30T21:12:52-07:00
New Revision: 240592a772a40b4ffa75921f7b555d2a969b3383
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/240592a772a40b4ffa75921f7b555d2a969b3383
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/240592a772a40b4ffa75921f7b555d2a969b3383.diff
rniwa wrote:
Thanks for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90180
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -360,6 +370,16 @@ class TrivialFunctionAnalysisVisitor
return TrivialFunctionAnalysis::isTrivialImpl(Callee, Cache);
}
+ bool
+ VisitSubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr(const SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr *E) {
+// Non-type template paramter is trivial if the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Craig Topper (topperc)
Changes
Instead of hardcoding the 4 current profile prefixes, treat profile selection
as a fallback if we don't find "rv32" or "rv64".
Update the error message accordingly.
---
Full diff:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc
Author: Craig Topper (topperc)
Changes
Instead of hardcoding the 4 current profile prefixes, treat profile selection
as a fallback if we don't find "rv32" or "rv64".
Update the error message accordingly.
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/topperc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90700
Instead of hardcoding the 4 current profile prefixes, treat profile selection
as a fallback if we don't find "rv32" or "rv64".
Update the error message accordingly.
>From
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90195
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-05-01T11:52:14+08:00
New Revision: 410d6350eda322de213941b36adcdab13a0b557b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/410d6350eda322de213941b36adcdab13a0b557b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/410d6350eda322de213941b36adcdab13a0b557b.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90195
>From f708694fc2686684589dca7b8f3738a117fc047e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:06:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Sema] Avoid an undesired pack expansion while
transforming
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 3ea9ed471c8dca8f703d7f3ce93d274a718b54bb
7a087f06240ce09a64fe679df14380e2fa538701 --
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90195
>From f708694fc2686684589dca7b8f3738a117fc047e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:06:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Sema] Avoid an undesired pack expansion while
transforming
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90195
>From f708694fc2686684589dca7b8f3738a117fc047e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:06:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Sema] Avoid an undesired pack expansion while
transforming
https://github.com/damyanp approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90694
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90686
>From c4fec501607059b1030b7c53794ad271194d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:28:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [InstallAPI] Support mutually exclusive parse options
nikic wrote:
> I gave this a test and _almost_ nothing changed. So looks good in that regard.
I expect that the main producer of scalable GEPs is LoopVectorize, which will
already use the llvm.vscale representation anyway. So there's probably not many
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90555
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-04-30T20:01:34-07:00
New Revision: 8e9b1e9aa83b44fad44954bbd01c824def2b190f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8e9b1e9aa83b44fad44954bbd01c824def2b190f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8e9b1e9aa83b44fad44954bbd01c824def2b190f.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// This tests that the coroutine elide optimization could happen succesfully
with ThinLTO.
+// This test is adapted from coro-elide.cpp and splits functions into two
files.
+//
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64-linux -std=c++20 -O2
MaskRay wrote:
> When we parse 3-components triples, if the Arch and Env have been parsed
> successfully, we have to make a choice between Vendor and OS for the
> unrecoginzed component. Noramlly it is the middle one.
>
> In the current code, Vendor is choosed, and then OS is fallbacked to
shafik wrote:
> @cor3ntin @shafik Hi, I want to take charge of this issue and submit a PR for
> the fix.
I would open a new PR and reference this one in the summary for completeness.
It looks like this one is not going to picked up by the author and so if you
can take it over and finish it
@@ -406,6 +406,16 @@ void TargetInfo::adjust(DiagnosticsEngine ,
LangOptions ) {
LongDoubleAlign = 64;
}
+ // HLSL explicitly defines the sizes and formats of some data types, and we
+ // need to conform to those regardless of what architecture you are
targeting.
+
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chris B (llvm-beanz)
Changes
We had some odd places where we set target behaviors. We were setting the long
size in target-specific code, but it should be language-based. We were not
setting the Half float type semantics correctly, and
https://github.com/llvm-beanz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90694
We had some odd places where we set target behaviors. We were setting the long
size in target-specific code, but it should be language-based. We were not
setting the Half float type semantics correctly, and
haoNoQ wrote:
(If yes, LGTM!)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1151,6 +1151,13 @@ std::string Triple::normalize(StringRef Str) {
}
}
+ // For 3-component triples, the middle component is used to set Vendor;
MaskRay wrote:
Suggested comment
If "none" is in the middle component in a three-component triple,
haoNoQ wrote:
Ok am I reading this right: this is about testing code that lives directly in
namespace `std::` but somehow still lives in your project right? Such as your
custom modifications to standard classes, various overloads and specializations
of standard things.
This patch does not
@@ -1151,6 +1151,13 @@ std::string Triple::normalize(StringRef Str) {
}
}
+ // For 3-component triples, the middle component is used to set Vendor;
+ // while if it is "none", we'd prefer to set OS.
+ // This is for some baremetal cases, such as "arm-none-elf".
+ if
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// This tests that the coroutine elide optimization could happen succesfully
with ThinLTO.
+// This test is adapted from coro-elide.cpp and splits functions into two
files.
+//
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64-linux -std=c++20 -O2
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
LGTM other than the other tiny comment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90414
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -360,6 +370,16 @@ class TrivialFunctionAnalysisVisitor
return TrivialFunctionAnalysis::isTrivialImpl(Callee, Cache);
}
+ bool
+ VisitSubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr(const SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr *E) {
+// Non-type template paramter is trivial if the
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90180
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apolloww closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90672
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Wei Wang
Date: 2024-04-30T18:08:40-07:00
New Revision: b1b1bfa7bea0ce489b5ea9134e17a43c695df5ec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1b1bfa7bea0ce489b5ea9134e17a43c695df5ec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1b1bfa7bea0ce489b5ea9134e17a43c695df5ec.diff
wzssyqa wrote:
@peterwaller-arm It seems OK now. Let's wait the result of CI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
>From aafa018b3d7657483738fa91812e3e8bbdd8205a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:55:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Triple::normalize: Use none as OS for XX-none-ABI
When we
apolloww wrote:
> This test has been failing on bots for several hours now. Can we either get
> this fix in or the original change reverted to get the bots back to green?
> One failing bot is https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/280/builds/2876.
sorry for the breakage, the same fix is
wzssyqa wrote:
@peterwaller-arm half-done. Do *NOT* merge it now. It has still some problem.
See `clang/test/Driver/baremetal-multilib.yaml`.
There is still some `none-unknown`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
>From aafa018b3d7657483738fa91812e3e8bbdd8205a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:55:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Triple::normalize: Use none as OS for XX-none-ABI
When we
dyung wrote:
This test has been failing on bots for several hours now. Can we either get
this fix in or the original change reverted to get the bots back to green? One
failing bot is https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/280/builds/2876.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90672
ahatanak wrote:
We could use the function name without the prefix as the key when searching for
the subprogram in `CGDebugInfo::createInlinedTrapSubprogram`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/ahatanak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230
>From 95200f3bb3859738981240a9d8c503a13ede9601 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:18:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] Add support for builtin_verbose_trap
The builtin causes
https://github.com/sbc100 approved this pull request.
I'm not very familiar with this code, but it looks reasonable on the surface.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90690
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
MaxEW707 wrote:
> Maybe we should just be testing if the copy-assignment operator is deleted?
> For reference, MSVC also returns the following indirectly:
>
> ```
> struct Test
> {
> int x;
> Test& operator=(const Test&) = delete;
> };
> Test foo();
> Test test(Test x)
> {
> return
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-coroutines
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Wei Wang (apolloww)
Changes
Follow up to #90310, limit the tune up only to ThinLTO pre-link as
coroutine passes are not in MonoLTO backend
Also coro-elide-thinlto test is still failing on some Buildbots,
https://github.com/apolloww created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90690
Follow up to #90310, limit the tune up only to ThinLTO pre-link as coroutine
passes are not in MonoLTO backend
Also coro-elide-thinlto test is still failing on some Buildbots, only run the
test under x86_64
apolloww wrote:
OK, so Mono LTO backend pipeline does not have any coro passes. We can add
coroutine passes to `buildLTODefaultPipeline`, but I am not sure how big the
use case it is. For now, I'll limit the tuning to ThinLTO only. Will send an
update soon.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Cyndy Ishida (cyndyishida)
Changes
Projects like libc use mutually exclusive macros to compile files multiple
times and then merge the result into the final library. For installapi to
accept these, we'd need to parse the same
https://github.com/cyndyishida created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90686
Projects like libc use mutually exclusive macros to compile files multiple
times and then merge the result into the final library. For installapi to
accept these, we'd need to parse the same declarations in
https://github.com/cyndyishida closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90664
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Cyndy Ishida
Date: 2024-04-30T16:10:20-07:00
New Revision: 278774e428c280b6ab62c147ac33b6837dad6dd5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/278774e428c280b6ab62c147ac33b6837dad6dd5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/278774e428c280b6ab62c147ac33b6837dad6dd5.diff
jcsxky wrote:
> I'm actually working on constraint checking for function template
> specializations in #88963. I don't think this patch is quite right... this
> will cause a crash if the befriended function is a member of a class template
> specialization. Relative to the changes in #88963, I
apolloww wrote:
hmm, this looks like `llvm.coro.subfn.addr` is not lowered before codegen
starts. And this is for wasm and MonoLTO. Let me check.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90676
>From 052dfeb8d94971dadfa65147f79d5fa37910b0e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Anderson
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:16:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][modules] stdarg.h and stddef.h shouldn't
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90676
>From 8d8756f00297e90e0b1125d2a78d3f41c9aae6a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Anderson
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:16:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][modules] stdarg.h and stddef.h shouldn't
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87596
>From 03266b74d973075eb5dfa27f32bb9c1bb75d73f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:46:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [BoundsSafety] Allow 'counted_by' attribute on pointers
in
sbc100 wrote:
The function being compiled in the crash looks like this one:
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/blob/56547157a37e25fb31f9193461a2c88bdaa44385/system/lib/embind/bind.cpp#L66-L68
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90310
sbc100 wrote:
This change seems to causing the auto-roller for emscripten to fail due to a
crash in LTO. See
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/emscripten-releases/builders/luci.emscripten-releases.ci/linux-test-suites
```
PromoteIntegerOperand Op #3: t22: i32,ch = llvm.coro.subfn.addr t26,
MaskRay wrote:
Clang configuration files
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#configuration-files cover your use
case and the feature is exactly designed to avoid such cmake default configs.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ian Anderson (ian-twilightcoder)
Changes
stdarg.h and especially stddef.h are textual and so everything they declare
gets precompiled into all of their clients' pcm files. They shouldn't directly
declare anything though, their purpose is
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90676
stdarg.h and especially stddef.h are textual and so everything they declare
gets precompiled into all of their clients' pcm files. They shouldn't directly
declare anything though, their purpose is to
@@ -5636,6 +5636,84 @@ void
CGDebugInfo::EmitExternalVariable(llvm::GlobalVariable *Var,
Var->addDebugInfo(GVE);
}
+void CGDebugInfo::EmitPseudoVariable(CGBuilderTy ,
+ llvm::Instruction *Value, QualType Ty) {
+ // Only when -g2 or
@@ -5636,6 +5636,84 @@ void
CGDebugInfo::EmitExternalVariable(llvm::GlobalVariable *Var,
Var->addDebugInfo(GVE);
}
+void CGDebugInfo::EmitPseudoVariable(CGBuilderTy ,
+ llvm::Instruction *Value, QualType Ty) {
+ // Only when -g2 or
@@ -1787,7 +1787,26 @@ Value *ScalarExprEmitter::VisitMemberExpr(MemberExpr *E)
{
}
}
- return EmitLoadOfLValue(E);
+ llvm::Value *Result = EmitLoadOfLValue(E);
+
+ // If -fdebug_info_for_profiling is specified, emit a pseudo variable and its
@@ -908,6 +908,74 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitIfStmt(const IfStmt ) {
incrementProfileCounter();
}
+bool CodeGenFunction::checkIfLoopMustProgress(const Expr
*ControllingExpression,
+ bool IsTrivialCXXLoop) {
+ if
apolloww wrote:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/188/builds/45187
```
Error running ThinLTO backend: No available targets are compatible with triple
"x86_64-unknown-linux"
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90672
___
cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-coroutines
Author: Wei Wang (apolloww)
Changes
Previous fix #90549 didn't completely address the Buildbot failures.
Some target may not recognize the target triple. This time, only run the test
under x86_64-linux.
---
Full diff:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Wei Wang (apolloww)
Changes
Previous fix #90549 didn't completely address the Buildbot failures.
Some target may not recognize the target triple. This time, only run the test
under x86_64-linux.
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/apolloww created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90672
Previous fix #90549 didn't completely address the Buildbot failures. Some
target may not recognize the target triple. This time, only run the test under
x86_64-linux.
>From
https://github.com/andykaylor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2024-04-30T14:43:45-07:00
New Revision: fb85a282d125a2805632285b29686392e6922b66
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb85a282d125a2805632285b29686392e6922b66
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb85a282d125a2805632285b29686392e6922b66.diff
https://github.com/apolloww closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90549
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Wei Wang
Date: 2024-04-30T14:31:31-07:00
New Revision: 0232b77e145577ab78e3ed1fdbb7eacc5a7381ab
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0232b77e145577ab78e3ed1fdbb7eacc5a7381ab
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0232b77e145577ab78e3ed1fdbb7eacc5a7381ab.diff
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-04-30T23:05:47+02:00
New Revision: 699243343439285ec2fe61b4ae568c7a958c7ce2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/699243343439285ec2fe61b4ae568c7a958c7ce2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/699243343439285ec2fe61b4ae568c7a958c7ce2.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Cyndy Ishida (cyndyishida)
Changes
Add validation in the FileList reader to check that the headers exist and use
similar diagnostics in Options.cpp
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90664.diff
4 Files Affected:
https://github.com/cyndyishida created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90664
Add validation in the FileList reader to check that the headers exist and use
similar diagnostics in Options.cpp
>From 42ad6921fdf179647f6529ddeb7d060e93e0f52f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
perry-ca wrote:
ping @MaskRay. Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89854
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
higher-performance wrote:
Hi, is this a new requirement? I don't wish to commit my personal information
here. What are my options?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/higher-performance updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90634
>From 013b692fbd8ec3aab4913b65582e11c5be566c77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: higher-performance
<113926381+higher-performa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:40:59 -0600
Subject:
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87596
>From 03266b74d973075eb5dfa27f32bb9c1bb75d73f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:46:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [BoundsSafety] Allow 'counted_by' attribute on pointers
in
jyu2-git wrote:
> LG
Thanks Alexey!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 462 matches
Mail list logo
