On 1/23/06, Zbigniew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if I'm being dense---why does it need to release any finalizers
at all, if the pending buffer is totally empty? I thought the size of
the pending buffer was the issue here.
It's me who is dense, I guess - even if the pending buffer is empty
Finally I've figured out the main showstopper to get Chicken compiled by Watcom
(at least at the moment). To be precise, chicken.exe and chicken-static.exe can
be compiled but they don't work :)
The problem is in the default Watcom calling convention (it's similar to MSVC's
__fastcall): it
Folks,
I'm looking for LALR (egg) parser examples. Can you share any? An
example of using a lexer like Silex (egg) with LALR would be most
helpful.
I'm trying to build a parser for a Pascal-like language but have
trouble with a few things.
For example:
(require 'lalr)
(define parser
Hi Joel!
I'm looking for LALR (egg) parser examples. Can you share any? An
example of using a lexer like Silex (egg) with LALR would be most
helpful.
See below:
(require 'lalr)
(define parser
(lalr-parser
;; terminal symbols
(ABOVE AGO ALERT AND ARRAY ARRAY-NUMERIC
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Dominique Boucher wrote:
[...]
How do I quote the parens and brackets above and use them later? Is
that even possible without renaming them to L-BRACKET, etc.?
Terminals can only be denoted by Scheme symbols. So yes, you'll have to
rename all special characters to
For what it's worth, attached is a quick and dirty patch to resize the
pending finalizer buffer upward dynamically. Not being an expert in
Chicken internals, I'm sure there are subtleties I overlooked.
Example run: 5600 finalizers, normally takes 27 seconds and 3575 major
GCs (at -:f2048), and
Terminals can only be denoted by Scheme symbols. So yes,
you'll have to
rename all special characters to LBRACKET, RBRACKET,
SEMICOLON, etc.
[...]
Hello,
if the terminals are symbols, couldn't you use symbol quoting
syntax then,
like |\[|, |\]|, ... ?
Of course! But I much
No, I do not support a chg. I was just thinking of the text form
abbreviation of Objective-C. Your right, obj-c:class-name is more
confusing.
Best Wishes,
Kon
On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Zbigniew wrote:
On 1/21/06, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
objc:box/unbox instead of
No. You are correct.
Best Wishes,
Kon
On Jan 21, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Toby Butzon wrote:
Hi,
I haven't tried your stack.egg, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but
I noticed in the description it says it implements FIFO queue
(stack)
operations on this page:
Sergey Khorev wrote:
Finally I've figured out the main showstopper to get Chicken compiled by Watcom (at least at the moment). To be precise, chicken.exe and chicken-static.exe can be compiled but they don't work :)
The problem is in the default Watcom calling convention (it's similar to
BM I moved my computer away from the internet, fired up ol win98 and tried
BM your program. As expected, it compiled ok and printed garbage.
BM
BM Next I removed the cast from the function pointer
BM proc3 p = (proc3)proc; // (proc3) cast hides error
BM
BM
BM
BM Now the problem is
11 matches
Mail list logo
