I've just written some bindings to fnmatch(3), which provides
shell-style wildcard pattern matching for filenames. Much like `glob`
from the posix module, only it matches two strings, returning a
boolean rather than descending directories and returning a list of
matching filenames.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:54:07AM +0100, Caolan McMahon wrote:
I've just written some bindings to fnmatch(3), which provides
shell-style wildcard pattern matching for filenames. Much like `glob`
from the posix module, only it matches two strings, returning a
boolean rather than descending
I published leveldb bindings a while ago. It turns out the
implementation had some issues with mangled keys in some
circumstances. I've now fixed these issues and created some additional
eggs to compliment leveldb. The new eggs are as follows:
level - provides the leveldb interface (put/get etc)
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Caolan McMahon wrote:
I published leveldb bindings a while ago. It turns out the
implementation had some issues with mangled keys in some
circumstances. I've now fixed these issues and created some additional
eggs to compliment leveldb. The new eggs
I'm hoping to write (or encourage someone else to write) a
memory-only
implementation of the 'level' API, which would be useful for testing
or other circumstances where you want to use a module written to the
'level' interface without persisting data.
Sounds useful. And perhaps some
Caolan McMahon scripsit:
I'm hoping to write (or encourage someone else to write) a memory-only
implementation of the 'level' API, which would be useful for testing
or other circumstances where you want to use a module written to the
'level' interface without persisting data.
It would be
I've got a couple of blog posts on SXML and namespaces, if you haven't already
seen them:
http://3e8.org/blog/2010/07/30/namespaces-in-sxml-part-1/
http://3e8.org/blog/2010/07/31/namespaces-in-sxml-part-2/
http://3e8.org/blog/2010/08/01/default-namespaces-in-sxml/
but these are higher-level and
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Matt Gushee m...@gushee.net wrote:
Hmm, just realized something. The test egg documentation also says:
Percentage difference allowed ...
So if the expected value is 0, then no variance is allowed? If that's
true, then epsilon isn't what I want anyway. I
