Everything OK here!
Operating system: Windows 8
Hardware platform: x86-64
C Compiler: GCC 4.9.3 (mingw)
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes (bind)
Petr
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> If you can, please let us know the following information about the
> environment you tested the RC tarball on:
I just tested on a Raspberry Pi 2 (32-bit), all good here as well:
Operating system: Debian Jessie
Hardware platform: ARMv7
Hey Peter
I'm not going to have a chance to do this for a few days as I'm
traveling this week. I'll get to it after the weekend if no-one else is
able to.
Sorry about that!
cheers, J
2016-04-11 @ 16:50:03 -0700
* Peter Bex, on 2016-04-11 @ 13:44 -0700:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 07:24:37PM -0400, J Irving wrote:
> > Hey Peter
> >
> > Here's a script log. Let me know if you need anything else.
>
> Thanks for the log. It looks like there's really an important bug that
> we've overlooked:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 07:24:37PM -0400, J Irving wrote:
> Hey Peter
>
> Here's a script log. Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks for the log. It looks like there's really an important bug that
we've overlooked: AFAICT everything else in your log is sane.
I've created ticket #1227 to
Hey Peter
Here's a script log. Let me know if you need anything else.
cheers, J
2016-04-08 @ 19:23:32 -0400
Script started on Fri Apr 8 19:15:54 2016
Now using node v5.10.1 (npm v3.8.3)
[1m[7m%[27m[1m[0m
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:11:40PM -0400, J Irving wrote:
> Hey Peter
>
> Operating system: OS X 10.11.4
> Hardware platform: MBP 13, mid 2014, 3GHz Intel Core i7
> C Compiler: Apple LLVM version 7.3.0 (clang-703.0.29)
> Installation works? yes
> Tests work?: no
>
> test output:
>
rik Falor <ewfa...@gmail.com> [2016-04-08 11:59 -0600]:
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:59:29 -0600
> From: Erik Falor <ewfa...@gmail.com>
> To: chicken-users <chicken-users@nongnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 4.11.0 release candidate 1
> availab
To Peter,
Sorry about the spam. I realized that I didn't hit "Reply to all"
until after I hit the send button :/
Operating system: SlackwareARM 14.1
Hardware platform: armv7l (Raspberry Pi 2)
C Compiler: GCC 4.9.3
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes
> we are happy to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming
Good work!
Time to go forward . (5) :-)
Operating system: Ubuntu 16.04 (Beta)
Hardware platform: x86-64
C Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 AND clang 3.8
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes
Sven
Peter Bex writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> we are happy to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming
> CHICKEN 4.11.0. It is now available at this location:
>
> http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2016/04/04/chicken-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SHA 256 sum of that
Hi all,
To reply to my own mail, I've tested on Debian, in 6 different
configurations. Spoiler alert: all work fine except clang on ppc:
Operating system: Debian Wheezy (7.9)
Hardware platform: x86
C Compiler: GCC 4.7.2 AND clang 3.0
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of
Thanks a lot for this release candidate! :)
Operating system: AlpineLinux 3.3 (Busybox/Linux with musl libc)
Hardware platform: ARMv7 (32bits)
C Compiler: GCC 5.3.0
Installation works?: Yes
Tests work?: Yes
Installation of eggs works?: Yes (spiffy)
I got some warnings at compilation, but
On 04/05/2016 12:34 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
> we are happy to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming
> CHICKEN 4.11.0.
Great job CHICKEN people!
> Here's a suggested test procedure:
>
> $ make PLATFORM= PREFIX= install check
Went all fine.
> $ /bin/chicken-install pastiche
se
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Bahman Movaqar wrote
> On 04/05/2016 02:33 PM, Matt Gushee wrote:
>
> > csi and csc appear to work, but chicken-install segfaults:
>
> Have you set `CHICKEN_PREFIX` and `CHICKEN_REPOSITORY` to point to the
> new installation directory?
On 04/05/2016 02:33 PM, Matt Gushee wrote:
> Okay, the news is better than before, but not all good.
>
> OS: Manjaro Linux
> Platform: x86_64
> Compiler: gcc 5.3.0
> Installation works? yes
> Tests work? yes
> Installation of eggs works? NO
>
> csi and csc appear to work, but
Okay, the news is better than before, but not all good.
OS: Manjaro Linux
Platform: x86_64
Compiler: gcc 5.3.0
Installation works? yes
Tests work? yes
Installation of eggs works? NO
csi and csc appear to work, but chicken-install segfaults:
$ chicken-install
readline
Error:
I guess one of my incidental actions did screw things up. I've started
over, and this time compilation was successful.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Matt Gushee wrote:
> Sure. The main commands I ran were:
>
> $ tar zxvf /var/tmp/chicken-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz
>
> $ cd
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:34:21AM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote:
> Sure. The main commands I ran were:
>
> $ tar zxvf /var/tmp/chicken-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz
>
> $ cd chicken-4.11.0rc1/
>
> $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=/opt/chicken411
>
> Also before the make invocation, I did some ls's and
Sure. The main commands I ran were:
$ tar zxvf /var/tmp/chicken-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz
$ cd chicken-4.11.0rc1/
$ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=/opt/chicken411
Also before the make invocation, I did some ls's and less's, and also did
export LC_ALL=C
... hoping it might cause 'ls [A-Z]*' to
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:02:52AM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote:
> Thanks for the new release. Here's my compilation report:
>
> Operating system: Manjaro Linux
> Hardware platform: x86_64
> C Compiler: gcc 5.3.0
>
> Compilation fails with the messages shown below. This is apparently the
> first
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:24:06AM +0200, alexander.she...@web.de wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:12:35AM +0200, alexander.she...@web.de wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > we are happy to announce the first release candidate
Thanks for the new release. Here's my compilation report:
Operating system: Manjaro Linux
Hardware platform: x86_64
C Compiler: gcc 5.3.0
Compilation fails with the messages shown below. This is apparently the
first invocation of 'chicken' - which on my system refers to the installed
chicken
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:12:35AM +0200, alexander.she...@web.de wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > we are happy to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming
> > CHICKEN 4.11.0. It is now available at this location:
> >
> >
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> we are happy to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming
> CHICKEN 4.11.0. It is now available at this location:
>
> http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2016/04/04/chicken-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz
>
> The SHA
Thanks, Peter and all the CHICKEN Team for this new release candidate.
Operating system: Linux Mint 17
Hardware platform: x86-64
C Compiler: GCC 4.9.3
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes
Hello everyone,
we are happy to announce the first release candidate
Hello everyone,
we are happy to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming
CHICKEN 4.11.0. It is now available at this location:
http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2016/04/04/chicken-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz
The SHA 256 sum of that tarball is
27 matches
Mail list logo