Thanks, Peter! I applied the patch.
I won't have time to create a proper test suite now, but I'll keep your
instructions for the future.
Best wishes,
Arthur
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:28:26PM +0100, Andy Bennett wrote:
>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:28:26PM +0100, Andy Bennett wrote:
> Hi Peeps!
>
> I'm running CHICKEN 4.9.0rc1 and I'm trying out the memoize egg.
>
> I saw the tail-call-optimized version of the factorial procedure in the
> memoize documentation at http://api.call-cc.org/doc/memoize and I've
> been
Dear Andy, good to know you are playing with the memoize egg. ATM I don't
have time to look deeper into the problem you pointed out. Sorry for that.
After I finish some personal stuff I'll dig into it.
Cheers,
Arthur
Em 01/04/2016 11:56, "Andy Bennett" escreveu:
> On
On 01/04/16 15:28, Andy Bennett wrote:
> Hi Peeps!
>
> I'm running CHICKEN 4.9.0rc1 and I'm trying out the memoize egg.
>
> I saw the tail-call-optimized version of the factorial procedure in the
> memoize documentation at http://api.call-cc.org/doc/memoize and I've
> been trying to modify it so
Hi,
>> I'm running CHICKEN 4.9.0rc1 and I'm trying out the memoize egg.
>>
>> I saw the tail-call-optimized version of the factorial procedure in the
>> memoize documentation at http://api.call-cc.org/doc/memoize and I've
>> been trying to modify it so that it memoizes intermediate results such
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:28:26 +0200,
Andy Bennett wrote:
>
> Hi Peeps!
>
> I'm running CHICKEN 4.9.0rc1 and I'm trying out the memoize egg.
>
> I saw the tail-call-optimized version of the factorial procedure in the
> memoize documentation at http://api.call-cc.org/doc/memoize and I've
> been