Re: [Chicken-users] Cryptic SSAX error message

2015-03-19 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:56:06PM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Peter Bex airh...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: You shouldn't parse HTML with an XML parser. Not in general, no. But wouldn't you agree that, regardless of what is wrong with the input file and why

Re: [Chicken-users] Cryptic SSAX error message

2015-03-19 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: On Mar 19 2015, Peter Bex wrote: there suck in a variety of different ways), so I'm sure a CMS in Scheme is going to make the lives of people like my former self more pleasant. 2 questions: * What features need to be

Re: [Chicken-users] Cryptic SSAX error message

2015-03-18 Thread Matt Gushee
Hi, Peter-- On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Peter Bex airh...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:27:36PM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: I was building a new blog with Coq au vin, which uses Civet to process templates, which in turn uses SSAX ... and one of my XHTML

Re: [Chicken-users] Cryptic SSAX error message

2015-03-17 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:27:36PM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: I was building a new blog with Coq au vin, which uses Civet to process templates, which in turn uses SSAX ... and one of my XHTML templates caused [an] error. [error elided] Now that's a helpful error message. It turns out the

[Chicken-users] Cryptic SSAX error message

2015-03-16 Thread Matt Gushee
Hello, all-- OK, first of all, I have not forgotten that the SXML tools are full of black magic, etc. - no need to rehash that discussion. And so if it is not deemed feasible to fix the misbehavior I'm seeing, so be it. But I couldn't let this pass without saying something. I was building a new