On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Thomas Chustch...@web.de wrote:
If, for example, you prepare a statement and forget to ever execute
and finalize it, my sqlite3 egg will at least tell you that you have
an unused statement lying around when you try to close the database.
sqlite3 will tell you
2009/8/12 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Thomas Chustch...@web.de wrote:
If, for example, you prepare a statement and forget to ever execute
and finalize it, my sqlite3 egg will at least tell you that you have
an unused statement lying around when you try to
2009/8/5 John Cowan co...@ccil.org:
[...]
How do I persuade chicken-install to accept this egg? Even with
-t local, it insists on looking up the egg with henrietta on kitten
(or your server, if I specify -l), gets a 301, and dies.
[...]
Hello,
indeed that doesn't work :-( What usually does
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:37:37AM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote:
Hello,
I finally got around to touch the code of the SQLite3 egg again: To
make it compatible with CHICKEN 4 I created a version without a
dependency on TinyCLOS, replacing classes with record types and
multimethods with regular
2009/8/5 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl:
[...]
You haven't seen zbigniew's sql-de-lite egg yet? It's another sqlite egg
with (IMHO) a more Schemely API.
[...]
Hello,
of course I have seen it, but several people requested my SQLite3
binding to be ported to CHICKEN 4 anyway.
The APIs of the
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 01:36:55PM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote:
of course I have seen it, but several people requested my SQLite3
binding to be ported to CHICKEN 4 anyway.
Fair enough, I just wanted to point it out :)
The APIs of the two bindings don't differ too much in my opinion, but
it
2009/8/5 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl:
[...]
Could you elaborate which parts of the
sql-de-lite API seem more schemely to you?
sqlite3 is more OO-like and has many operations which are purely invoked
for their side-effects (returning #void), whereas sql-de-lite seems
more FP-like and
Thomas Chust scripsit:
indeed that doesn't work :-( What usually does work if everything else
fails is to unpack the egg into an empty directory and just run
chicken-install without any arguments (except maybe -s) inside that
directory.
That fails thus:
$ chicken-install -s
Warning:
On Aug 5, 2009, at 8:14 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Thomas Chust scripsit:
indeed that doesn't work :-( What usually does work if everything
else
fails is to unpack the egg into an empty directory and just run
chicken-install without any arguments (except maybe -s) inside that
directory.
That
Hello,
I finally got around to touch the code of the SQLite3 egg again: To
make it compatible with CHICKEN 4 I created a version without a
dependency on TinyCLOS, replacing classes with record types and
multimethods with regular procedures. I also wrapped the code in a
module and removed the
Thomas Chust scripsit:
The documentation and a download link for the egg's release candidate
can be found at
http://www.chust.org/egg4/sqlite3.html
Try it out and please tell me if anything doesn't work or could be
improved in your opinion.
How do I persuade chicken-install to accept
On 8/11/05, Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I fixed two type conversion problems in the sqlite3 egg. The new version
is available at the same place as the old one.
cu,
Thomas Chust
Thanks, I'll replace it.
cheers,
felix
___
Hello,
I fixed two type conversion problems in the sqlite3 egg. The new version
is available at the same place as the old one.
cu,
Thomas Chust
Thomas Chust wrote:
[...]
The egg is available at http://www.chust.org/projects/sqlite3.egg, the
documentation, which is also included in the
Hello,
as the API for SQLite changed significantly from version 2.x to 3.x
because stronger typing was made possible as well as BLOB support, I
thought it may be nice to have a CHICKEN binding for the new API as well
as the old one.
The egg is available at
14 matches
Mail list logo
