On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:30PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
So far it seems my implementation of Burnikel/Ziegler division is rather
unstable, performance-wise. If I disable burnikel/ziegler so it falls
back to the traditional gradebook method, the benchmark finishes in
a quarter of the time
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:09:19PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
I already removed the use of the format egg (the code contains a
commented-out version that relies only on display), and even
completely disable the println call. It's hard to be sure, but it
*looks* like the majority of the time is
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:30PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
So far it seems my implementation of Burnikel/Ziegler division is rather
unstable, performance-wise. If I disable burnikel/ziegler so it falls
back to the traditional gradebook method, the benchmark finishes in
a quarter of the time
SBCL is Public Domain/MIT/BSD, depending on the component. GMP is dual
licensed as LGPL3 and GPL2.
The licensing issues would impact those who distribute binaries built
with SBCL, but only if they are statically linked to GMP.
-Dan
Stephen Eilert spedr...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 25,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:39:50AM -0700, Martin DeMello wrote:
Post to /r/scheme about chicken's bignum performance. (Not my post,
just figured it could use some eyeballs.)
http://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/3b1ujw/performance_of_chicken_scheme_numbers_bignums/
Hello Martin,
Thanks
Peter Bex scripsit:
Thanks for posting this. We had already been discussing it earlier
today in #chicken. I had another look at the code but I can't really
find any obvious inefficiencies. It is indeed a bit faster with
CHICKEN 5, but not by much.
Potential confounders are the I/O and the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:26:53PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:04:17PM -0300, Stephen Eilert wrote:
Not sure about the status of this particular GSOC, but SBCL could also be
cheating.
http://www.sbcl.org/gsoc2013/ideas/#sec-1.2
Now, I thought GMP were GPL'd
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Peter Bex pe...@more-magic.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:39:50AM -0700, Martin DeMello wrote:
Post to /r/scheme about chicken's bignum performance. (Not my post,
just figured it could use some eyeballs.)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 03:59:59PM -0400, co...@ccil.org wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
Thanks for posting this. We had already been discussing it earlier
today in #chicken. I had another look at the code but I can't really
find any obvious inefficiencies. It is indeed a bit faster with
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:04:17PM -0300, Stephen Eilert wrote:
Not sure about the status of this particular GSOC, but SBCL could also be
cheating.
http://www.sbcl.org/gsoc2013/ideas/#sec-1.2
Now, I thought GMP were GPL'd and SBCL not, so I'm unsure about the legal
implications, if it
Peter Bex scripsit:
Of course, Guile is cheating by using GMP. If I compare it to another
Scheme which has its own bignum implementation like Gauche, we perform
about the same. It's interesting that sbcl is doing so well. Maybe I'm
overlooking something seemingly minor but important?
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Peter Bex pe...@more-magic.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:26:53PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:04:17PM -0300, Stephen Eilert wrote:
Not sure about the status of this particular GSOC, but SBCL could also
be
cheating.
Post to /r/scheme about chicken's bignum performance. (Not my post,
just figured it could use some eyeballs.)
http://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/3b1ujw/performance_of_chicken_scheme_numbers_bignums/
martin
___
Chicken-users mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
