Re: [Chicken-users] understanding the CMake build

2006-09-12 Thread Thomas Chust
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: [...] Seems pretty important if removing the bootstrap compiler toasts the installation. [...] Hello, removing the bootstrap compiler only toasts the installed chicken-static and csi-static, not chicken and csi. And so far I have *never* had

Re: [Chicken-users] understanding the CMake build

2006-09-12 Thread Thomas Chust
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: [...] But, we'll see if my INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES bulletproofing has any effect on this problem. [...] Hello, I just pulled the latest changes using darcs and rebuilt {chicken,csi}-static with CMake -- I still get dynamically linked

Re: [Chicken-users] understanding the CMake build

2006-09-12 Thread Brandon J. Van Every
Thomas Chust wrote: On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: [...] Seems pretty important if removing the bootstrap compiler toasts the installation. [...] Hello, removing the bootstrap compiler only toasts the installed chicken-static and csi-static, not chicken and csi. And so

Re: [Chicken-users] understanding the CMake build

2006-09-11 Thread Thomas Chust
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: Thomas Chust wrote: [...] For this kind of issue, you'd need to write a trivial CMakeLists.txt that reproduces the problem, then get on the CMake mailing list and report the bug. I'll do that if it actually annoys me and if I have too

Re: [Chicken-users] understanding the CMake build

2006-09-10 Thread Thomas Chust
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: [...] As I don't have a Mac, and I don't really know the quality of CMake's MacOS X support, it wouldn't surprise me if there are troubles here. Felix, don't you have a Mac? Not trying to add to your burdens, but we do need someone around here

Re: [Chicken-users] understanding the CMake build

2006-09-09 Thread Thomas Chust
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: [...] I wonder, why would anyone else want to understand the CMake build? Unless they wanted to extend it, I can't think of a reason. [...] CMake online documentation in general is poor. The mailing list is great, you can get all your

Re: [Chicken-users] understanding the CMake build

2006-09-09 Thread Brandon J. Van Every
Thomas Chust wrote: Not only is the CMake documentation scarce, it also frequently seems to be wrong and in the past four weeks I have not managed, even after modifications in the CMakeLists.txt files, to get two large CMake powered projects, namely CHICKEN and VTK, to build using CMake

[Chicken-users] understanding the CMake build

2006-09-08 Thread Brandon J. Van Every
John Cowan wrote: Brandon J. Van Every scripsit: Actually, it does matter to us whether you or Brandon are getting burned out: it would be a huge job to take over supporting even the CMake build from zero, Actually I don't agree. I didn't do the "write