> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 08:13:53AM +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
> > Not sure if I understand. The problem lies in the context in which the
> > call to DOIT is performed?
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> > it expects any number of values in:
> >
> >(call-with-values
> >doit
> > (lambda
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 08:13:53AM +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
> Not sure if I understand. The problem lies in the context in which the
> call to DOIT is performed?
Yes, exactly.
> it expects any number of values in:
>
>(call-with-values
>doit
> (lambda args (apply values
Peter Bex wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 06:43:06AM +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
>> I do not understand why some place expects 1 argument. The problem goes
>> away if I replace:
>>(escape)
>> with:
>>(escape 1)
> Hi Marco,
> This is a known "issue", see #1390 and #1601. Improving
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 06:43:06AM +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
> I do not understand why some place expects 1 argument. The problem goes
> away if I replace:
>
>(escape)
>
> with:
>
>(escape 1)
Hi Marco,
This is a known "issue", see #1390 and #1601. Improving this so
that such
Ciao,
let's look at this script:
(import (scheme)
(chicken pretty-print))
(define (doit)
(call-with-current-continuation
(lambda (escape)
(pretty-print 'before)
(pretty-print escape)
(escape)
