On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 04:59:17PM -0600, Justin Meiners wrote:
> Operating system: Ubuntu 18.04
> Hardware platform: x86-64
> C Compiler: GCC 7.3
> Installation works?: yes
> Tests work?: yes
> Installation of eggs works?: no. I just tried installing spiffy and some
> srfi's. No matter what eggs
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 14:08:38 +0200 ko...@upyum.com wrote:
> [...]
> I checked the code and, for number types, only fixnums and flonums are
> explicitely handled, other numeric types trigger an incorrect recursion.
>
> It seems we forgot to add support for the new numeric types to srfi-69
> when
Thomas Chust wrote:
> this matters a lot: For one I have an application where it is crucial
> to be able to identify if the exact same object is passed more than
> once into certain functions and to be able to detect cyclic data
> structures – eq? and eq?-hash are supposed to be applicable to
>
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 10:25:44 +0100 Chris Vine wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 03:40:26 +0200
> Thomas Chust wrote:
> > [...]
> > Then I realized that eq?-hash simply cannot be called on certain types
> > of objects:
> > [...]
> > $ csi
> > CHICKEN
> > (c) 2008-2018, The CHICKEN Team
> >
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 03:40:26 +0200
Thomas Chust wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while trying to port some code from CHICKEN 4 to CHICKEN 5 I have just
> spent several hours tracking down a crash to a call of
> hash-table-ref/default for a table which happened to use eq? as the
> comparison function and was
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 09:23:19 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> On 18 Aug 2018 20:17:00 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
> wrote:
>
>> nothing changed, just ported
>>
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/llrb-syntax/master/llrb-syntax.release-info
>
> Thanks, Jörg. Your egg has been
Hi Jeremy,
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 15:55:36 -0600 Jeremy Steward wrote:
> On 08/18/2018 06:12 AM, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
>> On Aug 18 2018, Jeremy Steward wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Joerg,
>>>
>>> I'm the maintainer for that egg.
>>
>> I know; we talked about that before as I had packaged the same srfi
On 18 Aug 2018 20:25:15 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote:
> I'm amazed that this was actually portable to chicken 5 with so little
> effort.
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/sqlite3pth/master/sqlite3pth.release-info
>
> Caveat: this depends on
> 1. llrb-tree, which waits for
On 18 Aug 2018 20:18:30 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote:
> llrb-tree is also supposed to be ready to go.
>
> But this one depends on srfi-128 which in in the queue.
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/llrb-tree/master/llrb-tree.release-info
Thanks, Jörg. Let's wait for srfi-128 to
On 18 Aug 2018 20:10:17 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote:
> This could go to the C5-coop
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/pigeon-hole/master/pigeon-hole.release-info
Thanks, Jörg. Your egg has been added to the coop.
All the best.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
On 18 Aug 2018 20:17:00 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote:
> nothing changed, just ported
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/llrb-syntax/master/llrb-syntax.release-info
Thanks, Jörg. Your egg has been added to the coop.
All the best.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
On 17 Aug 2018 20:40:02 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote:
> there is an srfi-34 egg here
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/srfi-34/master/srfi-34.release-info
>
> https://github.com/0-8-15/srfi-34
>
> which compiles for me with both chicken 4 and chicken 5.
>
> Could go to the coop
12 matches
Mail list logo
