Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-21 Thread Peter Bex 
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 01:10:40AM +0200, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote:
> Here's a summary of the problems I encoutered with C5rc1 on Windows 10:

Hi Kris,

Many thanks for testing, especially on Windows (which can be pretty grueling!).

> - when linking statically, csc is looking for ".o" files (Kooda is looking
> into this I think) , improper patch here
> 

I filed https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1514 for this

> - pathname wierdness, see this paste
> 

I filed https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1515 for this.

> - generated .install.bat file produces copy syntax error (see this
> paste
> 

I filed https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1516 for this.

> Apart from these minor glitches, the CHICKEN 5 experience has been
> wonderful.

Excellent!

> I wanted to try static linking with CHICKEN 5 and this is the result, a
> poor man's TeamViewer:
> https://gist.github.com/kristianlm/16bbe626b54ad9b4e00fb8617d026bec

This is really impressive, especially if you see how little code is
needed for it!

Cheers,
Peter


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-20 Thread Kristian Lein-Mathisen 
Hi all,
and sorry about the late response on this one.

On my main Arch Linux, everything I tested has worked except building
statically against `check-errors` (ticket 1506
).

Operating system: Arch Linux
Hardware platform:  x86-64
C Compiler: GCC 8.2.0
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes

I also tested this on a win10 with make PLATFORM=mingw-msys install check:

Operating system: Win10
Hardware platform:  x86-64
C Compiler: GCC 8.2.0 (rev1 msys2)
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes

Note that I had to install the "diff" tool to make the check succeed.
Here's a summary of the problems I encoutered with C5rc1 on Windows 10:

- when linking statically, csc is looking for ".o" files (Kooda is looking
into this I think) , improper patch here

- pathname wierdness, see this paste

- generated .install.bat file produces copy syntax error (see this
paste

)

Apart from these minor glitches, the CHICKEN 5 experience has been
wonderful.

I wanted to try static linking with CHICKEN 5 and this is the result, a
poor man's TeamViewer:
https://gist.github.com/kristianlm/16bbe626b54ad9b4e00fb8617d026bec
K.

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:02 PM Peter Bex  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I also took some time to test on an old Hurd VM I had lying around.
>
> Operating system: Debian GNU/Hurd 0.9 (Mach 1.8+git20171101)
> Hardware platform: x86
> C Compiler: GCC 7.2.1
> Installation works?: yes
> Tests work?: yes
> Installation of eggs works?: yes
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
> ___
> Chicken-users mailing list
> Chicken-users@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-13 Thread Peter Bex 
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:41:22AM +0100, Norman Gray wrote:
> The installation of spiffy failed with:
> 
> [...]
>/Data/tools/chicken-5.0.0rc1-clang/bin/csc -host -D compiling-extension
> -J -s -setup-mode -I
> /Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files -C
> -I/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files -O2 -d1 
> /Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.scm
> -o 
> /Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.so
> /Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.c:395:85:
> error: use of undeclared identifier 'MAP_ANONYMOUS'
> t11=C_set_block_item(lf[14] /* memory-mapped-files#map/anonymous
> */,0,C_fix((C_word)MAP_ANONYMOUS));

This is the memory-mapped-files egg, which is a dependency of spiffy.
The MAP_ANON definition is marked as deprecated on GNU systems in favour
of MAP_ANONYMOUS, but other systems still hang on to MAP_ANON, sometimes
offering an alias as MAP_ANONYMOUS.  I've now changed it so that if
MAP_ANONYMOUS is undefined but MAP_ANON is defined, it is made an alias.

I've published a new release, which should appear on the egg servers shortly.

Cheers,
Peter


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-13 Thread Norman Gray 




On 13 Aug 2018, at 10:41, Norman Gray wrote:


C Compiler: Apple LLVM version 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81)


...and I should mention that I did the same test with the system 'gcc', 
which is the GCC front-end with the LLVM back-end, and got the same 
result.


I should further note that yes, these are quite old OS and compiler 
versions, but this machine is still my main desktop, so it's by no means 
obsolete.


Best wishes,

Norman


--
Norman Gray  :  https://nxg.me.uk
SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-13 Thread Norman Gray 



Operating system: OS X 10.10.5 (Yosemite)
Hardware platform: x86-64
C Compiler: Apple LLVM version 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81)
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: no

The tests produced a number of warnings and errors which I think were 
either expected or harmless, but I don't think any tests failed (though 
there wasn't a big 'nnn tests passed 0 tests failed' at the end).


The installation of spiffy failed with:

[...]
   /Data/tools/chicken-5.0.0rc1-clang/bin/csc -host -D 
compiling-extension -J -s -setup-mode -I 
/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files -C 
-I/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files -O2 -d1 
/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.scm 
-o 
/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.so
/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.c:395:85: 
error: use of undeclared identifier 'MAP_ANONYMOUS'
t11=C_set_block_item(lf[14] /* memory-mapped-files#map/anonymous 
*/,0,C_fix((C_word)MAP_ANONYMOUS));


^
/Data/tools/chicken-5.0.0rc1-clang/include/chicken/chicken.h:1023:56: 
note: expanded from macro 'C_fix'
#define C_fix(n)   ((C_word)((C_uword)(n) << 
C_FIXNUM_SHIFT) | C_FIXNUM_BIT)

   ^
/Data/tools/chicken-5.0.0rc1-clang/include/chicken/chicken.h:995:59: 
note: expanded from macro 'C_set_block_item'

#define C_set_block_item(x,i,y)(C_block_item(x, i) = (y))
  ^
1 error generated.

Error: shell command terminated with non-zero exit status 256: 'clang' 
'/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.c' 
-o 
'/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.o' 
-c  -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fno-common -DHAVE_CHICKEN_CONFIG_H 
-m64 -DC_ENABLE_PTABLES -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -DPIC -DC_SHARED 
-I/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files 
-I/Data/tools/chicken-5.0.0rc1-clang/include/chicken


Error: shell command terminated with nonzero exit code
256
"sh 
/Users/norman/.chicken-install/cache/memory-mapped-files/memory-mapped-files.build.sh"




I've got logs of both the build/test and the spiffy install, if it would 
be useful to send them off-list.


If I have time, I'll also try the build on a more recent version of the 
OS.


Best wishes,

Norman


--
Norman Gray  :  https://nxg.me.uk
SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-12 Thread kooda 
Hi there! Here are some tests results. :D

Operating system: Devuan unstable, glibc 2.27
Hardware platform: x86-64
C Compiler: GCC 8.2.0
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes (spiffy)

Operating system: Alpine Linux edge, musl-libc 1.1.19
Hardware platform: arm
C Compiler: GCC 6.4.0
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes (spiffy)


Little cross compilation test:

- Building a toolchain, on the first system (Devuan x86-64), for the
second system (Alpine ARM): works

- Building a static hello world for ARM on x86-64: works

- Building spiffy (and its dependencies) with the cross toolchain: works

- Building a simple static web server binary for ARM on x86-64: works

- Running both static binaries on the target system: works!! \o/

Just got a hint of warning from glibc because it requires the dynamic
library at runtime on the target system for some functions, but it
worked anyways!

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-12 Thread Peter Bex 
Hi all,

I also took some time to test on an old Hurd VM I had lying around.

Operating system: Debian GNU/Hurd 0.9 (Mach 1.8+git20171101)
Hardware platform: x86
C Compiler: GCC 7.2.1
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes

Cheers,
Peter


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-12 Thread Peter Bex 
Hi all,

I tested on Haiku.

Operating system: Haiku "Walter" revision hrev50904
Hardware platform: x86
C Compiler: GCC 5.4.0
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: no
Installation of eggs works?: no

I ran into some trouble with a few eggs, which I've fixed since.

I've also posted two patches for CHICKEN core to chicken-hackers.
These add a workaround for Haiku's broken stat(), which caused the
core tests to fail, and a fix for chicken-install's (platform ...)
clause, which caused some trouble getting the memory-mapped-files
egg to install correctly.

Cheers,
Peter


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-11 Thread Christian Kellermann 
* Claude Marinier  [180811 23:47]:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 at 17:33, Peter Bex  wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 05:19:40PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote:
> > > claude@GuloGulo:~/Programming/scheme$ chicken-install format
> >
> ...
> 
> > The format egg has not yet been ported to CHICKEN 5, so that's why
> > it cannot be installed.
> >
> 
> Hi Peter,
> That explains a lot. I see my favourite egg is also not ported: linenoise.
> I will wait.

I have just ported linenoise to chicken 5. It should be available
via chicken-install soonish.  Can you give it a try?

Thanks,

Christian

-- 
May you be peaceful, may you live in safety, may you be free from
suffering, and may you live with ease.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-11 Thread Claude Marinier 
On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 at 17:33, Peter Bex  wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 05:19:40PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote:
> > claude@GuloGulo:~/Programming/scheme$ chicken-install format
>
...

> The format egg has not yet been ported to CHICKEN 5, so that's why
> it cannot be installed.
>

Hi Peter,
That explains a lot. I see my favourite egg is also not ported: linenoise.
I will wait.


> > Building a simple time stamp program fails.
> > csc timestamp.scm
> > ./timestamp > prologue.scm
> > Error: unbound variable: command-line-arguments
> > Call history:
> > timestamp.scm:70: command-line-arguments  <--
>
> There is no "time" unit.  In general, you should not be dealing with
> units.  In CHICKEN 4 that's sometimes required when building statically,
> but in CHICKEN 5 that should always never be necessary.
>
> > timestamp.c:(.text+0x5f3): undefined reference to `C_time_toplevel'
> > Then I added this.
> > (declare (uses time posix))
> > Same error.
>
> You'd need to (import (chicken time posix)), I think.  That should
> take care of all the dependencies for you.
>

Works well. Thanks.

Installed the following eggs without issue: srfi-1, srfi-13, srfi-14,
srfi-69.

Chicken 5 is a lot closer.

Thank you.

-- 
Claude Marinier
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-11 Thread Peter Bex 
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 05:19:40PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote:
> claude@GuloGulo:~/Programming/scheme$ chicken-install format
> Server error:
> Error: [Server] no such extension or version
> "format"
> #f
> Server error:
> Error: [Server] no such extension or version
> "format"
> #f
> Error: extension or version not found: "format"
> 
> I must be missing something. Could the previous installation of Chicken
> 4,.13.0 be interfering?

Hi Claude,

The format egg has not yet been ported to CHICKEN 5, so that's why
it cannot be installed.

> Building a simple time stamp program fails.
> csc timestamp.scm
> ./timestamp > prologue.scm
> Error: unbound variable: command-line-arguments
> Call history:
> timestamp.scm:70: command-line-arguments  <--
> That should be in process-context which is included. Add this and try again.
> (declare (uses process-context))
> Fails again.
> sc timestamp.scm
> timestamp.o: In function `f_154':
> timestamp.c:(.text+0x612): undefined reference to
> `C_process_2dcontext_toplevel'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> Removing the offending call and the declaration reveals another issue: it
> cannot find seconds->local-time. So, I added this.
> (declare (uses time))
> Does not work.

There is no "time" unit.  In general, you should not be dealing with
units.  In CHICKEN 4 that's sometimes required when building statically,
but in CHICKEN 5 that should always never be necessary.

> timestamp.c:(.text+0x5f3): undefined reference to `C_time_toplevel'
> Then I added this.
> (declare (uses time posix))
> Same error.

You'd need to (import (chicken time posix)), I think.  That should
take care of all the dependencies for you.

Cheers,
Peter


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-11 Thread Claude Marinier 
Good afternoon,

Operating system: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Hardware platform: x86_64 (AMD A8-7600)
C Compiler: gcc 7.3.0
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: fails to install 'format'

claude@GuloGulo:~/Programming/scheme$ chicken-install format
Server error:
Error: [Server] no such extension or version
"format"
#f
Server error:
Error: [Server] no such extension or version
"format"
#f
Error: extension or version not found: "format"

I must be missing something. Could the previous installation of Chicken
4,.13.0 be interfering?


Building a simple time stamp program fails.
csc timestamp.scm
./timestamp > prologue.scm
Error: unbound variable: command-line-arguments
Call history:
timestamp.scm:70: command-line-arguments  <--
That should be in process-context which is included. Add this and try again.
(declare (uses process-context))
Fails again.
sc timestamp.scm
timestamp.o: In function `f_154':
timestamp.c:(.text+0x612): undefined reference to
`C_process_2dcontext_toplevel'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status


Removing the offending call and the declaration reveals another issue: it
cannot find seconds->local-time. So, I added this.
(declare (uses time))
Does not work.
timestamp.c:(.text+0x5f3): undefined reference to `C_time_toplevel'
Then I added this.
(declare (uses time posix))
Same error.

I have not worked with Chicken is several months. Am I missing something
obvious?

Thank you.

-- 
Claude Marinier
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-11 Thread Peter Bex 
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 09:15:26PM +0200, Peter Sommerfeld wrote:
> A scheme/chicken newbie here (second attempt).

Hi Peter,

Welcome (again) to CHICKEN!

> Am 11.08.2018 um 11:43 schrieb Peter Bex:
> > After many years of development, we are happy to announce the first
> > release candidate of the upcoming CHICKEN 5.0.0.  This represents
> > the largest change in CHICKEN since the 4.0.0 release.
> 
> I have compiled it on Win10 with mingw-64 with cmd.exe

Excellent!

> > make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=C:/Users/peter/chicken ARCH=x86-64 install
> > check
> 
> I added ARCH because without it compiling failed on chicken 4.

Should not be necessary as far as I know.

> Result:
> 23 tests completed in 0.172 seconds
>   23 (100.00%) tests passed
>   0 (0.00%) tests failed
> -- utf-8 tests --
> 
>  TOTALS:
>   2447 tests completed in 1.188 seconds
>   2447 (100.00%) tests passed
>   0 (0.00%) tests failed
> 
> A few stresstests seems to have failed. The transscript is too long to
> post it here. Of course, can be done if required.

I don't understand, can you elaborate on what failed exactly?

Cheers,
Peter


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-11 Thread Thomas Chust 
On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 11:43:58 +0200 Peter Bex  wrote:

> [...]
> After many years of development, we are happy to announce the first
> release candidate of the upcoming CHICKEN 5.0.0.  This represents the
> largest change in CHICKEN since the 4.0.0 release.
> [...]

Hello,

thanks for all the hard work, it's good to see CHICKEN 5.0 getting
close to completion :-)

> [...]
> If you can, please let us know the following information about the
> environment you tested the RC tarball on:
> [...]

Operating system: Linux Mint 18.3
Hardware platform: x86-64
C Compiler: gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.10)
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes

Ciao,
Thomas


-- 
We live in a society absolutely dependent on science and technology
and yet have cleverly arranged things so that almost no one understands
science and technology. That's a clear prescription for disaster.
-- Carl Sagan


pgpYkIgQed8_p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-11 Thread Peter Sommerfeld 

A scheme/chicken newbie here (second attempt).

Am 11.08.2018 um 11:43 schrieb Peter Bex:
After many years of development, we are happy to announce the first 
release candidate of the upcoming CHICKEN 5.0.0.  This represents

the largest change in CHICKEN since the 4.0.0 release.


I have compiled it on Win10 with mingw-64 with cmd.exe


make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=C:/Users/peter/chicken ARCH=x86-64 install
check


I added ARCH because without it compiling failed on chicken 4.

Result:
23 tests completed in 0.172 seconds
  23 (100.00%) tests passed
  0 (0.00%) tests failed
-- utf-8 tests --

 TOTALS:
  2447 tests completed in 1.188 seconds
  2447 (100.00%) tests passed
  0 (0.00%) tests failed

A few stresstests seems to have failed. The transscript is too long to
post it here. Of course, can be done if required.

Thanks all for your effort!

Peter

PS: waiting for system and mailbox egg ...



___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

2018-08-11 Thread Alexander Shendi (web.de) 
Operating System: Debian 9.4 under Chrome OS.
Hardware: ARM64 aka aarch64
C Compiler: gcc 6.3
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes 
Installation of eggs works?: yes

Many thanks to the CHICKEN team for making this happen.

Best Regards,

Alexander 

Am 11. August 2018 11:43:58 MESZ schrieb Peter Bex :
>Hello everyone,
>
>After many years of development, we are happy to announce the first
>release candidate of the upcoming CHICKEN 5.0.0.  This represents the
>largest change in CHICKEN since the 4.0.0 release.
>
>Most importantly, we have completely overhauled the module layout so
>that it should make more sense where each identifier is located.
>For a quick overview of where things are, see the page we used for
>discussion of these changes:
>https://wiki.call-cc.org/core-libraries-reorganization
>
>The manual has of course also been updated to reflect these new
>modules:
>https://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Included%20modules
>
>Other notable features are:
>- Full numeric tower
>- A new declarative egg description format for chicken-install
>- Improved support for static linking (eggs are now also compiled
>statically)
>- "Deployment" mode has been dropped as it was less portable and
>reliable
>  than static linking.
>- Builds are fully bit-for-bit reproducible (for core, but user code
>too)
>- Random numbers now use a better PRNG than libc rand() (namely,
>WELL512)
>- Core has gone on a diet: several libraries have been moved to eggs,
>like
>  srfi-1, srfi-13, srfi-14, srfi-18, srfi-69, and several other things.
>
>The (very long!) complete list of changes since version 4.13.0 is
>available here: https://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2018/08/11/NEWS
>
>CHICKEN 5.0.0rc1 is now available at this location:
>https://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2018/08/11/chicken-5.0.0rc1.tar.gz
>
>The SHA256 sum of that tarball is
>fb8af147e7965761dd212b53162b181d4c9473906fd889e719c71624bca65957
>
>Please give it a test and report your findings to the mailing list.
>
>Here's a suggested test procedure:
>
>  $ make PLATFORM= PREFIX= install check
>  $ /bin/chicken-install spiffy
>
>If you want to build CHICKEN with a compiler other than the default
>one,
>just use C_COMPILER= (e.g., C_COMPILER=clang) on the make
>invocation.
>
>Of course, feel free to explore other supported build options (see the
>README file for more information) and actually use CHICKEN 5.0.0rc1 for
>your software.  The tireless CHICKEN team has been busy porting eggs to
>CHICKEN 5 already, so you will find that many eggs you've been using
>have
>already been ported.  Check out the ever-growing list at
>https://wiki.call-cc.org/chicken-projects/egg-index-5.html
>
>If you want to port your code to CHICKEN 5, you'll note the number of
>changes are so large that it can be overwhelming.  That's why we've
>written up a porting guide to help you get your code over to the new
>version: https://wiki.call-cc.org/porting-c4-to-c5
>Please feel free to add to the guide if you run into problems that
>aren't
>yet addressed on this wiki page.
>
>If you can, please let us know the following information about the
>environment you tested the RC tarball on:
>
>Operating system: (e.g., FreeBSD 11.1, Debian 9, Windows 10 mingw-msys
>under 
>mingw32)
>Hardware platform: (e.g., x86, x86-64, PPC)
>C Compiler: (e.g., GCC 6.4.0, clang 5.0.0)
>Installation works?: yes or no
>Tests work?: yes or no
>Installation of eggs works?: yes or no
>
>Thanks in advance!
>
>The CHICKEN Team

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users