Heed General Lenoid Ivashovs warning. Post Lebanon I have discounted all the Internet hype concerning possible US attack on Iran until now. Lebanon was complete surprise and the only person I know who predicted level of resistance was former Swiss Army officer, Michael St. Clair. Sure, it was part of the plan. But the neocon plan has gone to poof ten ways to the middle and they continue to continue it worse following bad. For first time I have serious reason for concern we are building for near, very near, attack. Reader should read these links first. http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070327/62697703.html http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1888.shtml and, http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-Mahan-Al.html General Lenoid Ivashov also had an article in an American Foreign police magazine not too long ego. It concerned our coming election and was at time that it was thought sure to be McCain vs. Hillary. As therein he could not be too outspoken he used Admiral Mahan as a code above most heads but above stating that the US will keep same policy no matter which next president and that we have overestimated our sea power. He was not talking modern navy vs. modern navy or any navy but that technology has made all naval vessels vulnerable in littorals. (Google General Van Riper) In Millennium 2000 Van Riper played Iraq in the most expensive war game ever and sunk most of the US fleet in the Persian Gulf. For a time kept very quiet but story broke first in Army Times. All stops were taken out to counter. Woods Hole Oceanographic hydroids were plowing bottom. Naval divers were exhausted. Even platoons of trained dolphins were used off an Amphibious, USS Gunsten Hall, but more animal trainers had to be flown in to deal with dolphin boredom. Nothing seemed to work and it was like suddenly minor nations and even terrorists had a long bow that could take out a knight. Low tech beat high tech. Still does with this. We have at present much odd military activity. Almost all naval ships on West Coast are at sea. Massive convoys have been conveying military equipment from Ft. Bragg all the way up to Ft. Drum, New York, etc. Planes intercepting Russian bombers off Alaska are here called Nato???????? General Pace contradicted Bush way past point of insubordination but kept his position for some time. In fact he was more insubordinate than MacArthur, (but inversed!). Admiral Fallon may have erred only by NOT referring to nukes and implying ANY military actions against Iran would be stupid.
General situation if this goes forward: In general bombing is known more to tick off enemy. Logistics to forces we have will be far more complex. Persian Gulf will be far too risky. The United States cannot use air power to control over 2000 Chinese anti ship missiles hidden in Iran (all far superior to what sunk the HMS Sheffield). Oil flow will stop. Gas will be sky high to point of run on banks (see Ft. Drum above) etc. Afghanistan already has, by deployment, almost a front to east and would greatly extend southeast. Secret overland from Pakistan would cease (or even the question!!!). The never talked about overland to Iraq, trans Jordan from Aqaba, would be a giant risk. Horn of Africa will more than flair up- it will explode. Syria will turn. Turkey will hold as still as possible. On the inside the generals and decent flag officers have been screaming against any thought of attacking Iran. So what exactly would be the motivation to go forward anyway? This is a thousand times more difficult to explain because it goes very much against massive wrongful programming given to the masses for more than half a century. Understanding this would explain how dangerous it is for those now in power it would be if Iran did nothing else but hold present course. It is my hope that some will understand and it will be passed around enough to overt dangerous military stupidity. If Iran is simply to hold present course a secret deal brokered first between Henry Luce and Joe Stalin will come to an end. This deal is the central glue that holds massive illegal activity, drugs/arms/you-name-it together as that has been the all important checking mechanism as the deal secret. It is through this deal that, on a level few know about, the formation of the Israeli Mossad was really a cover for combining checking apparatus for CIA/KBG and bringing in other nuclear or soon-to-be-nuclear others. This is why level of violence had to be maintained there to have Israeli people consent to pay for all this even though they were unaware of it. (Google Kay Griggs to see how this was done.) There is a good overview of the deal and simplified as it was explained to a child turning 11 years old in the form of a true-story play at: http://www.midcoast.com/~michael1/aspyintime.htm In essence it was seen early how easy nukes were to make. In the day between the bombs going off over Nagasaki and Hiroshima Oppenheimer made a speech at Los Alamos. He was devastated at what just did and what would soon occur. However suddenly he became very positive noting how very easy they were to make and the implications thereof. War would need cease. Even threatening use would be major. A few years of real concern passed. Something had to be done to keep control of the masses. Henry Luce went to Stalin and said in effect, We will make them but have a secret deal not to use them. Stalin (in effect) said, I love it, I love it, but I cant do this. You can trust me as I am in charge here. But we never know who in charge there. Luce had to prove (just enough in public) that Eisenhower was not commander-in-chief so Fortune Magazine was used to prove Ike not in charge. (See Elsners Vol II of Time Inc.) This real reason for power of Ikes departing speech. Even though China did not set off a nuke until after 1960 they well could have prior. They had to be brought in also. Again Luce made the deal with them in Tehran. The flight back to Rockefeller Center was about 30 hours and mid flight Luce was handed a note. The Chinese had crossed the Yalu and entered Korea. Of course. They knew they would not be nuked. The public is fed, (including those who think they are high up) myths. They are convinced through the Cold War the navies would play cat and mouse. Therefore those at top loved books such as Hunt For Red October. In truth these only occurred in special play pens to make look real. They would be far too dangerous to be real. There are hints of how tight at top in both the book and movie Falcon And The Snowman. Public thinks missiles shields can stop missiles. Missiles are not needed. Bring a nuke in on a yacht, set a timer, get on a bus. Public thinks nukes hard to build. Things that were not even too difficult in 1945 are far simpler with machines that can be got at Toys-R-Us. Russia and China have always held to the deal (a deal is a deal) but in public have been reluctant. It is the United States and England that assures any deal regarding nukes falls apart. Russia and China in public more want them. If Iran is allowed to hold to course the deal will fall apart. More the checking mechanisms will be more obvious and those at top left holding bag with international drug trade and such as the false flag 9/11. Iran must be stopped at any cost or they will be hung. Yes, some of the plants are so well protected that you would need a mini nuke. If used it might not come out or be covered up for some time. For a nuke to have full effect, as they did in Japan, they must go off at an altitude of about 100 meters. If the nuke follows a bunker bomb it can at least be hidden as such for a time and the Iran screaming be called bluff. Or a small nuke might not even be used at all. Pass this around as much as possible.
