Jason Koh wrote:
From what I see, it looks like a problem with NVRAM.
show running-config doesn't work on the (nvram-stored) running-config.
Any insights on this will be greatly appreciated.
contact TAC, they can help debug it further based on the actual
configuration stored on your
Hi all,
I've CISCO router with IOS 12.2(28)SB7 and model 7000 series. It is supporting
IS-IS but IS-IS MIB support is not there. My questions are
1) Is there any patch/way available to enable this IS-IS
MIB(standard/experimental) support for this IOS.
2) How to enable IS-IS MIB support.
Jason Koh wrote:
Hi there
I have a strange problem with a pair of cat6509s. Both are connected to each
other via OSPF and IBGP, with EBGP with my upstream providers.
Whenever I use show running-config, it will pause for an extremely long time
after the line Building Configuration. It happens
Hi there.
1. The time taken for show run is about 7-10 minutes long
2. #sh start
Using 67275 out of 391160 bytes
Can't really tell how much lines are there. It's a lot.
3. ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.1(11r)E1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: c6sup2_rp Software (c6sup2_rp-PS-M), Version
Jason Koh wrote:
Hi there.
1. The time taken for show run is about 7-10 minutes long
2. #sh start
Using 67275 out of 391160 bytes
Can't really tell how much lines are there. It's a lot.
For comparison, we've got:
Using 220185 out of 1964024 bytes
...and ~8300 lines in the config and an
Given its not a solution to your problem, but you can use the
*linenum*keyword behind the sh start command to display the line
numbers.
So you know how many line numbers you got.
best regards
Michel
2008/9/30 Jason Koh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there.
1. The time taken for show run is about 7-10
Michel Grossenbacher wrote:
Given its not a solution to your problem, but you can use the
*linenum*keyword behind the sh start command to display the line
numbers.
So you know how many line numbers you got.
Maybe on some versions of IOS, but certain not on any 12.2SX release
I've ever seen
Uhm my bad, yes you're right. I dont know why I still think that all IOS
versions got the same architecture and base features, I should know it by
now :-)
2008/9/30 Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michel Grossenbacher wrote:
Given its not a solution to your problem, but you can use the
Michel Grossenbacher wrote:
Uhm my bad, yes you're right. I dont know why I still think that all IOS
versions got the same architecture and base features, I should know it by
now :-)
Indeed. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a
duck, it's probably an Early Deployment
I got in touch with the ASR1000 PM's. I had remembered seeing a discussion
on it.
I can see both sides of the fence on this one.
Originally what the BU really wanted was two feature sets (Base and
Advanced Enterprise Services) and they were priced accordingly.
A number of customers wanted a
Well, you are waiting for NVGEN which ...
snip
I've just found a URL which explains it so I don't have to :
http://6200networks.com/2008/09/17/configuration-generation-performance-enhancement/
I can tell you I have NVGEN caching enabled on 12.2SXH2a on SUP720
router(config)#parser config ?
I have FWSM running 4.0(2) in 6509 with sup 720 CXL running
12.2(33)SXH2a
The FWSM runs in transparent mode and appears between our ISPs and
edge router. The FWSM has 3 BVIs , one for each ISP.
The same router connects to 3 downstream routers via 3 different gig
interfaces.
With the
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:55:52PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
Well, you are waiting for NVGEN which ...
snip
I've just found a URL which explains it so I don't have to :
http://6200networks.com/2008/09/17/configuration-generation-performance-enhancement/
I can tell you I have NVGEN
Well, do you have a lot of VLANs configured?
Since vlan config is now done through the running-config as well,
I'm imagining NVGEN has to parse the vlan.dat as well , if it is big I
would imagine this adding to the NVGEN running time.
Dave.
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:13:46PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
Well, do you have a lot of VLANs configured?
Yea - on the order of a thousand, with SVIs and the whole nine yards.
The config is over 500kiB.
Since vlan config is now done through the running-config as well,
I'm imagining NVGEN
This sounds like similar issues one of my customers has had on this code
train with the FWSM's. Here's the bug id: CSCsI39710. We had to upgrade the
code to SXH4 to resolve this. It may be something else but the experience
sounds similar to what he was experiencing.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:41
Hello,
I have two 7201 (c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T3.bin) routers with
SA-VAM2+ modules.
I have a tunnel interface between this routers. If I make a ~24Mbit/sec
traffic into this tunnel, the routers CPU's goes to 90%. It was the
performance without VAM2+ too. So the VAM2+ modul
Hello!
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:55:52PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
I can tell you I have NVGEN caching enabled on 12.2SXH2a on SUP720
router(config)#parser config ?
cache Cache the configuration
It is a bit dangerous. I have seen invalid runing config output
while parser cache
A quick addition to this thread:
Assuming that your IGP carries is only point to point loopbacks...
In an all iBGP network - what do you do with customer's that are using
your address space? Do you redistribute Connected ( static routes) on
your access routers into iBGP? I assume that's
On average, the VAM2+ should be able to do ~60Mbps VPN traffic (on a 7206VXR
NPEG2)
Maybe try to use IPSEC profile configuration instead of the legacy interface
crypto map configuration.
And also, try a different IOS. There should be at least a 12.4.15T7 out
there I believe.
We have 2 6500/SUP2 running old 12.1(26)E9 and having almost 1MB of
uncompressed config and 14500 lines:
6500#sh start
Using 178291 out of 391160 bytes, uncompressed size = 976219 bytes
sh run takes about 10 sec and sh start only 1 sec.
On the other hand wr mem takes about 80 sec (compression
Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:55:52PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
I can tell you I have NVGEN caching enabled on 12.2SXH2a on SUP720
router(config)#parser config ?
cache Cache the configuration
It is a bit dangerous. I have seen invalid runing config output
Ryan do you hve any info on that BUG ID CSCsI39710? I cannot find it
in the BUG lookup tool nor do I see the IOS SXH4.
Thanks for the info.
Jeff
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Ryan Hughes wrote:
This sounds like similar issues one of my customers has had on this
code
train with the
Unfortunately our access network is highly distributed, consequently our
address space is highly de-aggregated at the access layer. We shove our
Supernets into iBGP regionally and currently let our IGP sort out the
lower layers... which is what I want to get away from.
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 22:59:34 Dan Armstrong wrote:
In an all iBGP network - what do you do with customer's
that are using your address space? Do you redistribute
Connected ( static routes) on your access routers into
iBGP? I assume that's about all you can do, right?
You can
Hi
I have set up a dual homed IP-VPN network between 2 PE's and 2 CE's using SoO
- thas all working fine. I have added an inbound route-map to the 'backup' PE
and CE to reduce the local preference in order to make the other PE and CE the
preferred gateways.
CE1PE1 primary
|
We had a problem with really slow config access with modular IOS on
sup720s. It took several minutes to do show running-config or write
mem. I don't remember the version, but switching back to non-modular
IOS fixed it.
Hi there
I have a strange problem with a pair of cat6509s.
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 23:56:29 Dan Armstrong wrote:
Unfortunately our access network is highly distributed,
consequently our address space is highly de-aggregated at
the access layer. We shove our Supernets into iBGP
regionally and currently let our IGP sort out the lower
layers...
Hi,
I have 2 bgp routers (named border1 and border2) with a ebgp session to one
ISP (yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) and ibgp session (xxx.xxx.xxx.1 and xxx.xxx.xxx.2).
My border2 is very very slow to converge. After +-3h I didn't get all my
border1 routes.
I reset the session it's the same. I tryed to debug
On Sep 30, 2008, at 1:14 PM, julien leroiso wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 bgp routers (named border1 and border2) with a ebgp session
to one
ISP (yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) and ibgp session (xxx.xxx.xxx.1 and
xxx.xxx.xxx.2).
My border2 is very very slow to converge. After +-3h I didn't get
all my
border1
Hi Laszlo,
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:55 +0200, Nemeth Laszlo wrote:
I have two 7201 (c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T3.bin) routers with
SA-VAM2+ modules.
I have a tunnel interface between this routers. If I make a ~24Mbit/sec
traffic into this tunnel, the routers CPU's goes to 90%. It
Here you go
PE1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 rd 894:1 5.14.93.0
BGP routing table entry for 894:1:5.14.93.0/24, version 222
Paths: (3 available, best #2, table ipvpn_0001)
Advertised to update-groups:
1
65535
5.14.95.244 (metric 11) from 5.14.95.244 (5.14.95.244)
Origin IGP, metric 0,
Try changing the route-map to:
route-map ipvpn_0001 permit 10
set extcommunity soo 894:1
set local-preference 90
instead of:
route-map ipvpn_0001 permit 10
set extcommunity soo 894:1
route-map ipvpn_0001 permit 20
set local-preference 90
Luan
Oh yeah,
Fragmentation definitely is problematic. When a packet has to be splitted
into two fragments to accommodate a smaller interface MTU and one of these
fragment packets is large enough that it needs to be fragmented again after
it has been encrypted. The IPSec peer has to reassemble this
Hi
It could be related to MTU size.
If the sending router has to fragment the encrypted packet the receiving
router must reassemble the packet before decrypting can take place.
Defragmentation is done at process-level.
show ip traffic will show this.
On my GRE/IPSEC tunnels i have
ip mtu
Having an issue with BGP...
I have a border router that can't do full feeds (6500/Sup2) so it is
taking partials (upstream customers). I am trying to make decisions
on which upstream to use as a default route. For traffic shaping
purposes, I have a server that acts as an eBGP peer to get the
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:14:50PM +0200, julien leroiso wrote:
I have 2 bgp routers (named border1 and border2) with a ebgp session to one
ISP (yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) and ibgp session (xxx.xxx.xxx.1 and xxx.xxx.xxx.2).
My border2 is very very slow to converge. After +-3h I didn't get all my
Perhaps set a static route for xx.xx.xx.xx (where you get your default
route) in your server?
-
Luan Nguyen
Senior Network Engineer
Mobile:
I have a Cat6506 VSS720-3C-XL switch on which I have configured BGP on a
VRF using address-family ipv4 unicast vrf internet. I am getting BGP
routes and all appears well but I can only display BGP info by using
show ip bgp vpnv4 ... commands. I didn't intend to run VPNV4 and it
appears the
Hi there.
We've had a few customer requests recently for TLS (transparent LAN service)
at some of our sites where we are connected via routers. Without changing
out half our network infrastructure in these areas to accommodate, I'm
looking for a way to utilize Cisco 1800,2800,3800 series
Hello Paul:
If you control the L2 transport all the way from each of the clients' sites
then you could just us Q-in-Q trunking. The next level up would be VPLS at
Layer 2 with isolated L2 domains on the same fabric. Finally. MPLS at Layer
3.
What portion of network do you control. Can you own
Thanks...
Yes, we own the end to end network however it's a routed network in those
segments...
router--router--router--switch--switch--router--router--router--rout
er specifically...;)
If we could hand them off a few VLAN's we would just do that and not even
use Q-in-Q unless we really needed
At 10:20 PM 9/30/2008, Paul Stewart wrote:
Yes, we own the end to end network however it's a routed network in those
segments...
router--router--router--switch--switch--router--router--router--rout
er specifically...;)
If we could hand them off a few VLAN's we would just do that and not even
43 matches
Mail list logo
