Thank you very much.
Christoph Loibl
Oliver Boehmer
Regards,
Tseveen.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
oboeh...@cisco.com wrote:
Tseveendorj wrote on Sunday, March 22, 2009 09:06:
Hello,
I'm trying to do PPPoE on c3825 router but I faced VPDN related
Hey all,
Say I have a QinQ VLAN from one place to another... and it goes through a few
switches.
If I wanted to do something to one of the VLAN's inside the QinQ, is that
possible?
Examples of things I would like to do.
- SVI with a IP address in an intermediate switch
- Push it
There is a way that I know, but it's not pretty.
Build the QnQ to an additional port on the device you want to inject/break out
the VLAN from. Make sure it is mode dot1q-tunnel. Then loop it (cross connect
it) to another port on the same device and make that is a trunk port. Specify
the
2009/3/23 Swati Sharma networkstuff.train...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
Thanks for prompt reply. My fault, I forgot to put mpls ldp sync under
address family. Now it is up.
and what does it have to do with isis adj?
am I missing something here?
--
pgp-key 0x1C655CAB
signature.asc
Description:
Nice feature the login enhancement, but could you please share with me what
would be a good recommended setting for all the values?
On the web page they talk about using the auto secure command, I don't seem
to have such option on my IOS, but I have all the others, so I guess I'll have
to set
Hi All
I am looking for IOS feature or solution can do the following , there are 2
hosts A and B from the same subnet , when host A connects to host B , router
should forward traffic to next-hop X while when host B connects to A ,
router should forward traffic to next-hop Y
both A and B are
On Monday 23 March 2009 05:31:46 pm Mateusz Blaszczyk wrote:
and what does it have to do with isis adj?
am I missing something here?
I was thinking the same thing - it might seem more probable
that this might have had something to do with IOS XR's
failure to commit the configuration, but
Hello!
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:08:54PM +0200, Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
I complete several TCAM management tests by myself and clearly
see that current 12.2(50)SG1 software do all TCAM rearrangements
pretty well.
Nice work, Cisco! A lot of thanks!
Could anybody clear me with TCAM on Cat4500
I use it on some managed routers sitting on other ISP networks. We
allow access via the access class from the ISPs that us admins have home
accounts on, in addition to the block dedicated to the company that
manages them. If we get more than 3 failed attempts in a 1 minute
period, it'll lock
Actually... this is exactly what I came up with this afternoon as a
work-around... but I was kind hoping it was stupid and there was an easier more
sensible way is there? ;-)
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
ske...@eintellego.net /
I would suggest testing auto secure in a lab environment first rather
than on a production device. You don't want to auto secure your way out
of admin access to the device...
Justin
Ziv Leyes wrote:
Nice feature the login enhancement, but could you please share with me what
would be a good
All,
I'm just looking for confirmation that GRE on the 3750G is done in
software with the resulting low throughput (~20Mbps with iperf across
GRE tunnel on 3750G). All testing and reading that I've done indicates
that the hardware on the 3750 is not especially built for
router-specific features
Hi all:
I am trying to upgrade the ios for Cisco Aironet 1200 AIR-AP1231G-A-K9 Wireless
AP and have few questions. It has only 16MB memory in it.
1) Do I have to delete the original code before copy new code in? It seem to be
so since every time I tried to copy new code in, in the half
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009, Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote:
All,
I'm just looking for confirmation that GRE on the 3750G is done in
software with the resulting low throughput (~20Mbps with iperf across
GRE tunnel on 3750G). All testing and reading that I've done indicates
that the hardware on the 3750
I've always done the upgrade via the web U/I. If it fails, you can
delete everything then copy and extract the tar.
I'm running JEC2
- Jared
On Mar 23, 2009, at 11:30 AM, snort bsd wrote:
Hi all:
I am trying to upgrade the ios for Cisco Aironet 1200 AIR-AP1231G-A-
K9 Wireless
Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote:
All,
I'm just looking for confirmation that GRE on the 3750G is done in
software with the resulting low throughput (~20Mbps with iperf across
GRE tunnel on 3750G). All testing and reading that I've done indicates
that the hardware on the 3750 is not especially built
Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote:
All,
I'm just looking for confirmation that GRE on the 3750G is done in
software with the resulting low throughput (~20Mbps with iperf across
GRE tunnel on 3750G). All testing and reading that I've done
indicates
that the hardware on the 3750 is not especially
Thanks for the clarifications and feedback received from all.
GRE on 3750 = software switched with no candy and tastes bad :-(
GRE on 3845 = software switched but with candy so it's more palatable
:-)
Vijay Ramcharan
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd
Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications and feedback received from all.
GRE on 3750 = software switched with no candy and tastes bad :-(
GRE on 3845 = software switched but with candy so it's more palatable
But careful, too much of it will rot your teeth :-)
Jeff
I have a situation on a 7206VXR w/ a NPE-G1 where I need to add a MC DS3
module. The box already has 4 PA-A3-OC3SMI PAs. I'd like to add a
PA-MC-T3 to the box as well. I know that the OC3 PAs max the bandwidth
points out for each PCI bus. However the OC3s are very lightly loaded.
Looking
I think there was a supportable way of adding another module via the IO
slot using a special card in the IO slot that provides you with a PA
slot that doesn't count towards the BW points of the other busses if I
remember correctly.
Justin Shore wrote:
I have a situation on a 7206VXR w/ a NPE-G1
Hi Ibrahim,
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 12:59 +0200, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote:
I am looking for IOS feature or solution can do the following , there
are 2 hosts A and B from the same subnet , when host A connects to
host B , router should forward traffic to next-hop X while when host B
connects to A
I have crafted and applied some rules which I thought would prioritize
traffic from an 871w (via ADSL) to one specific host. The idea is that
any traffic destined to this host should be prioritized over all other
traffic.
Unfortunately my test show absolutely no effect. If I upload a couple of
Hi John,
==match access-group name al-qos1==
That acl doesnt exist?
Also for DSL, use some appropiate bandwidht values:
bandwidth xxx
bandwidth receive yyy
Use the show policy-map interface dialer 0 to see if the matching works
Regards,
Wouter
2009/3/23 John Lange j...@johnlange.ca
I have
Hi all,
I am looking for a tool/a collective of tools to help me better manage my
traffic on my edge router. I am thinking that looking at netflows and BGP
paths would be the best but I am unsure of the tools to use to start
collecting this information.
I would like to have a tool that allows
Jeff,
I would like to have a tool that allows me to historically view traffic
trends going to destination AS's so I can adjust some route-maps to better
balance traffic egressing my network. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
That one seems easy and straightforward.
Mateusz Blaszczyk wrote:
Jeff,
I would like to have a tool that allows me to historically view traffic
trends going to destination AS's so I can adjust some route-maps to
better
balance traffic egressing my network. Any suggestions would be
appreciated.
That one seems easy and
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:55:19PM -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
That G1 is truly bored, averaging below 10% utilization. I know that
IOS will bitch about it on boot but it will still continue to work won't
it? Any other side effects (other than TAC not liking it if they see it
until I
Yep, the part number is C7200-JC-PA.
Details:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps341/product_data_sh
eet0900aecd804419c6.html
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Walter Keen
Sent: Monday,
The card Walter mentioned is the C7200-JC-PA.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps341/product_data_sheet0900aecd804419c6.html
It works with the NPE-G1 or G2 and it looks like the PA-MC-T3 is listed
a supported adapter in it. This basically replaces your I/O card (or
blank if
Hi,
We have some bandwidth issues between two sites, experiencing out
discards on interfaces.
The connection is currently between 2+2 switchports in WS-X6516-GBIC
cards and they're connected by ~4 km SM connection with LX GBICs. The
redundancy is blocked by STP.
To increase bandwidth in a cost
Hi,
I wonder if anyone had experienced the problem I have noticed with
dynamic routing (BGP) running over IPSec link.
I have traced the archived posts regarding the IPSec problems but could
not find anything regarding my case.
There is a typical remote access site connected to MPLS-VPN cloud
On 24/03/2009, at 6:17 AM, Jeff Crowe wrote:
I am looking for a tool/a collective of tools to help me better
manage my
traffic on my edge router. I am thinking that looking at netflows
and BGP
paths would be the best but I am unsure of the tools to use to start
collecting this
Peter Rathlev wrote:
As far as I can understand the loadsharing is strictly deterministic, so
out-of-order frames shouldn't be a problem. I assume the switch itself
doesn't care about the difference; we plan to use LACP as we do on all
other etherchannels.
AFAIK, etherchannel will select one
Hi Jeff-
Netflow Tracker is a very nice product, however it's got a reasonable price tag
for it:
http://www.flukenetworks.com/fnet/en-us/products/NetFlow+Tracker/
We've been using it for quite a while.
Jon Wolberg
Operations Manager
PowerVPS / Defender Hosting
Defender Technologies Group,
Hello list,
Does anyone have any experience with high volume webcontent that is
loadbalanced through ASN?
From the cisco website:
Asymmetric server normalization (ASN): Cisco ACE can load balance an
initial request from the client to a real server; however, the server
directly responds to the
Gert Doering wrote:
IOS will bitch, but unless this has changed recently, all interfaces will
just work. Of course you're on your own - if you complain to TAC about
high CPU and packet losses, they are very likely to tell you your
own fault.
OTOH, if the PA-A3s are *so* lightly loaded, I'd
From the cisco website:
Asymmetric server normalization (ASN): Cisco ACE can load balance an
initial request from the client to a real server; however, the server
directly responds to the client, bypassing Cisco ACE.
I am curious how the ACE perfomance scales.
with linux, iproute2 is your
38 matches
Mail list logo
