Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:50:44PM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 22:44 +0200, Dirk-Jan van Helmond wrote: I've asked my accountmanager @Cisco, so you please ask yours. Maybe if we ask kind enough, they will think about it ;) Yeah, that usually works like a charm.

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

Geoffrey Pendery schrieb: The stuff we've been reading (look at Supervisor Engines Supported on the data sheets for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series 10 Gigabit Ethernet Interface Modules, or browse the line cards for the 7600, or go into Configurator tool) claims that the RSP 720 won't support the

[c-nsp] Problem with L2TP !!

Dear friends! I am trying to establish a L2TP tunnel between a LAC (Which is also Acting as BRAS) and LNS (Which is also acting as BRAS). User -[Cisco 3640 LAC]- IP Cloud---[Cisco 3845 LNS] The problem I am facing is that the scenario is working fine as long as I am

[c-nsp] dhcprelay regression on latest pix 515 firmware (8.0.4)

Hi I've uncovered a problem with the latest pix 515 firmware (asa-8.0.4) which didn't exist in 8.0.3. The dhcprelay function no longer works in some circumstances. Specifically, I can no longer do automated linux client installs over the network (FAI). The initial dhcp at pxeboot time works

[c-nsp] 6500/7600 Pseudowires

Hi All, I have a pseudowire running between an IX and my peering router in another country. There's a SIP600 in a 7606/SUP7203B at the far end facing the IX and a WS-X6748-GE-TX + DFC3B in a 7613/SUP7203B at this end facing the peering router. The local 7613 is connected to the remote

[c-nsp] how to filter some specific logging message

Is it possible to filter some specific syslog message with logging filter command or with logging discriminator? There are some cosmetic bugs that I need to filter... Example: i don't want the specific message message including fem to be sent to my remote syslog server. I try that configuration

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3750 high CPU utilization HL3U bkgrd]

Hello All, Have you encountered a similar situation? Thank you, On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ioan Branet ioan.bra...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, We have many Cisco 3750 switches in our network which have high CPU utilization.It seems that the process that cause this high load is:HL3U

Re: [c-nsp] how to filter some specific logging message

The drops keyword expects a regular expression. You should use fem instead of *fem (or maybe .*fem). Ivan http://www.ioshints.info/about http://blog.ioshints.info/ -Original Message- From: Manu Chao [mailto:linux.ya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:26 PM To:

[c-nsp] SXI1 is out

...but release notes haven't been updated yet. I'm having a maintenance window tomorrow and i was planning to upgrade 3 6500s from SXF9 to SXI, but since SXI1 came out, i'm thinking of moving directly to it. Anyone know what is fixed from SXI to SXI1? PS: I was running SXI in a lab for a few

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: ...but release notes haven't been updated yet. I'm having a maintenance window tomorrow and i was planning to upgrade 3 6500s from SXF9 to SXI, but since SXI1 came out, i'm thinking of moving directly to it. Anyone know what is

Re: [c-nsp] Problem with L2TP !!

Dear friends! I am trying to establish a L2TP tunnel between a LAC (Which is also Acting as BRAS) and LNS (Which is also acting as BRAS). User -[Cisco 3640 LAC]- IP Cloud---[Cisco 3845 LNS] The problem I am facing is that the scenario is working fine as long as I am

[c-nsp] Bridging DS1s from Overture ISGs back to Cisco channelized DS3 interfaces

Has anyone ever successfully terminated a group of bonded DS1s from an Overture device such as an ISG 140 back to a PA-MC-2T3-EC? Talking to Overture's support they're saying that even though they use MLPPP they also require the use of BCP (Bridge Control Protocol) which I personally hadn't

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

SXI didn't support Netflow export from a VRF other than the global table. The command option wasn't available in the ip flow export command syntax. Here is what I am seeing in SXI 6509(config)#ip flow-export destination 10.1.1.3 9996 ? cr The vrf flag was available in SXH. Has that been

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

Mike Louis wrote: SXI didn't support Netflow export from a VRF other than the global table. The command option wasn't available in the ip flow export command syntax. Here is what I am seeing in SXI 6509(config)#ip flow-export destination 10.1.1.3 9996 ? cr The vrf flag was available in

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

Good to know. I didn't it much in SXH, just installed SXH enough long enough to see the command was there. We had a multi-VRF deployment and SXH crashed and went to ROMMON once we configured 3 or more EIGRP AS #s in VRF-Lite deployment. We had to go to SXI for stability with EIGRP and VRF-lite.

[c-nsp] Problems bringing up BGP session

I moved the BGP session to a new router for my Quagga route server. It was working before the move but now it comes up, the RS gets all the routes and in ~5 mins. the session goes down. This looks like bug CSCsv33977. I can't apply the workaround as I do not have the command

Re: [c-nsp] Problems bringing up BGP session

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Leonardo Gama Souza leonardo.so...@nec.com.br wrote: Hi... Try again. It is a hidden command. Thanks, yep it was there. But is did not fix my problem: pr 1 11:40:44.351 mdt: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 198.59.128.243 Up Apr 1 11:47:44.994 mdt:

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any data of value. - jared On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Mike Louis wrote: Good to know. I didn't it much in SXH, just installed SXH enough long enough to see the command was there. We had a multi-VRF deployment and

[c-nsp] RES: Problems bringing up BGP session

Hi... Try again. It is a hidden command. -Mensagem original- De: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Em nome de james edwards Enviada em: quarta-feira, 1 de abril de 2009 13:44 Para: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Assunto: [c-nsp] Problems bringing up

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

Mike Louis wrote: SXI didn't support Netflow export from a VRF other than the global table. The command option wasn't available in the ip flow export command syntax. Here is what I am seeing in SXI 6509(config)#ip flow-export destination 10.1.1.3 9996 ? cr The vrf flag was available in

[c-nsp] Unknown Multicast Traffic cause High CPU

Hello, We have a metrothernet customer using vlan 993, we are experimenting high CPU usage by unknown multicast traffic coming from this vlan id 993 and this expand over several switches on the network, but when we remove the vlan from some pop sites the behavior stop. After that we add the

Re: [c-nsp] Unknown Multicast Traffic cause High CPU

What does a network packet dump tell you? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:01 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any data of value. Hm, I thought it worked okay. Out of curiosity, what should one be careful about with it, if one's network was dominated by 6500s? We only use it for

[c-nsp] HWIC-1GE-SFP hot insert ?

Does anyone know if this module can be hot inserted ? Cisco says SFP's can be hot inserted but I can't find anything about the HWIC-1GE-SFP itself. Thanks, -- James H. Edwards Senior Network Systems Administrator Judicial Information Division jedwa...@nmcourts.gov

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

RSP720 supervisor is supported from 12.2(33)SRB and supports X6704 from the beginning. X6708 is supported from 12.2(33)SRC for both SUP720 and RSP720 in the SR train. Regards, Gabor -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]

Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

I'd rather live in cable-hell than use pass-trough modules On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:15 , Elmar K. Bins wrote: Dirk, c-...@djvh.nl (Dirk-Jan van Helmond) wrote: We're thinking about getting some Cisco CBS 3110 blade switches to aggeregate the interfaces from the bladeservers. The CBS3110

Re: [c-nsp] HWIC-1GE-SFP hot insert ?

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:36:34 james edwards wrote: Does anyone know if this module can be hot inserted ? Cisco says SFP's can be hot inserted but I can't find anything about the HWIC-1GE-SFP itself. AFAIK, and according to the panel on the 3845 here, OIR is not supported by any WIC or

Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

c-...@djvh.nl (Dirk-Jan van Helmond) wrote: I'd rather live in cable-hell than use pass-trough modules Then, please: Good luck with your account manager. Oh, and someone tell me as soon as the 3750s do ISSU... ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Unknown Multicast Traffic cause High CPU

Charles, In this case we didn't do a packet dump due the network is equipment have the cpu very high and this affect several equipments at the same time due this behavior do not allow to made additional testing. The equipments are cat4503, cat6506 and cat3750. Thanks, -Mensaje

Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

The 6500 barely supports it. In fact, I don't know any customers running mod due to the train wreck it is. Anyone here running mod successfully? If so, how long? But, you can upgrade separate 3750 members and do one switch at a time today. What does ISSU get you on the 3750? tv -

[c-nsp] Pseudowire and EtherChannel

Quick question on PS and EtherChannel. Lets say I have customer who needs 2 gig from A to Z that I am going to transport by Pseudowire... Should I etherchannel the ports and make my xconnect in the Port Channel interface, or just transport each gig interface separately, and customer handles all

Re: [c-nsp] IP Address management software

IPPlan here as well... If you are running an RWHOIS server there is also a nice script that someone wrote to automatically pull the data from IPPlan and build the RWHOIS data files. http://gregsowell.com/?p=223 On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Gary Roberton wrote: Hello all What IP address

Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

Tony Varriale wrote: But, you can upgrade separate 3750 members and do one switch at a time today. You can? Doesn't the reload crash the whole stack? Jeff ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

Peter Rathlev wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:01 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any data of value. Hm, I thought it worked okay. Out of curiosity, what should one be careful about with it, if one's network was dominated by 6500s? We

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

Is anyone happily using per-interface NDE on SXI? That would be a huge leap in usefulness. David ... On 02/04/2009, at 4:01 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any data of value. - jared

[c-nsp] vrf aware cluster-id

Running 124T to take advantage of per vrf bgp router id so that the router can have loopback bgp connections. However, route-reflector-client is not taking effect, the neighbor reports denied CLUSTER_LIST loop. Apparently cluster-id needs to be vrf aware as well for this to work. Is this in

Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out

0n Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:50:01PM +0300, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: ...but release notes haven't been updated yet. I'm having a maintenance window tomorrow and i was planning to upgrade 3 6500s from SXF9 to SXI, but since SXI1 came out, i'm thinking of moving directly to

[c-nsp] WS-X6724-SFP SXI = high cpu usage?

Anyone running SXI with a WS-X6724-SFP module (DFC or non DFC), showing high cpu usage due to the fw_lcp process? 6500#remote command module 1 sh proc cpu sort | exc 0.00 CPU utilization for five seconds: 32%/1%; one minute: 31%; five minutes: 31% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6724-SFP SXI = high cpu usage?

...small correction : a DFC must be present -- Tassos Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote on 02/04/2009 08:13: Anyone running SXI with a WS-X6724-SFP module (DFC or non DFC), showing high cpu usage due to the fw_lcp process? 6500#remote command module 1 sh proc cpu sort | exc 0.00 CPU