[c-nsp] Inter-AS EoMPLS/VPLS

Does anyone have any experience? I can see it's supported only on IOS-XR, so 7600 it's out of the question (any plans?). http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.7/mpls/configuration/guide/gc37v2.html#wp1100339 -- Tassos ___ cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router

Hi All I was studying some HSRP senario which is little bit different than what used to work on , we have 2 routers connected with access ports to internal box which has 2 direct physical layer-2 links to both routers and HSRP is running between VLAN SVIs on both routers across L2 ether-channel

Re: [c-nsp] Inter-AS EoMPLS/VPLS

Hi Tassos, You could do inter-AS EoMPLS by using Pseudo Wire stitching/switching, which is supporte don 12.2(33)SRC on the 7600. It's done as a kind of VPLS domain, however it can only handle one neighbour. __ Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards Lars Lystrup

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?

___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?

___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?

___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?

___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Inter-AS EoMPLS/VPLS

___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] BGP - OSPF (Or another way?)

___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router

On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:30 +0300, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: I was studying some HSRP senario which is little bit different than what used to work on , we have 2 routers connected with access ports to internal box which has 2 direct physical layer-2 links to both routers and HSRP is running

[c-nsp] 3750E and X2-10GB-ZR compatibility?

Just a quick question: The 3750E doesn't support X2-10GB-ZR tranceivers[1], only up to ER. Using service unsupported-transceiver I can get the switch to recognize the transceiver, but will I be able to get a link with it? It's for testing part of a fiber stretch, so it's not for production. Does

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?

On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote: On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Maxwell Reid wrote: It's using them in combination with vShield Zones at the ESX level (new feature of v4) that yields the best results. It's also important to note that all of this runs in software, and is

[c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?

Guys Does anyone of you knows a good DSLAM for HDSL ADSL ? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?

Occam... ;) -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Juan C. Crespo R. Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:34 AM To: Cisco Post NSP Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ? Guys Does anyone of

[c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B

I Have a brand new 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B booting up in rommon mode i was able to type the command boot so it can look for the right code to boot up but after i configured the switch i turned off and turned it back on, it boot up in rommon mode again and everything was lost. I know someone

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?

Juan, Cisco does not make DSLAMs for a long time now... Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Juan C. Crespo R. Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 18:34 To: Cisco Post NSP Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router

I think this document can provide more insight: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/DC_Infr a2_5/DCInfra_6.html Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B

Hi Renelson, What's the configuration register set to? (sh boot) once you're in IOS. 0x0 will bring you to rommon everytime, 0x2102 will boot the sup using the config file. Aaron - Aaron Childs Assistant Director, Networking Westfield State College http://www.wsc.ma.edu/it/

[c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

Hi there. We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they have a new deployment currently going into an MDU (condos). They have asked for a recommended switch that is IPTV friendly - I'm presuming they mean multicast aware etc. Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?

Yup Cisco does not make DSLAMs anymore. I think paradyne guys are doing great job in fact. http://www.paradyne.com/ Regards, Masood Juan, Cisco does not make DSLAMs for a long time now... Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Paul Stewart wrote: Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff approximately 20 Cat5 drops fed by fiber coming in? 3560/3750 seems to work well for this. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

Take a look at the ME3400 series. - Ed --Original Message-- From: Paul Stewart Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation Sent: Jun 10, 2009 1:25 PM Hi there. We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

On 10/06/09 13:25 -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they have a new deployment currently going into an MDU (condos). They have asked for a recommended switch that is IPTV friendly - I'm presuming they mean multicast aware etc. Which Cisco switches would

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

Chris Knipe wrote: We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

On 10/06/09 14:27 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: Chris Knipe wrote: We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most important thing is

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

It depends - largely on the type of Multicast you're rolling out. I had mixed results with 3560's running IP Base versus IP Services for SSM/AutoRP roll out. Depending on your requirements you could maybe get IP Base to work but best results were with IP Services. Ryan On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

Ryan Hughes wrote: It depends - largely on the type of Multicast you're rolling out. I had mixed results with 3560's running IP Base versus IP Services for SSM/AutoRP roll out. Depending on your requirements you could maybe get IP Base to work but best results were with IP Services. Ryan On

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

hey, We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they have a new deployment currently going into an MDU (condos). They have asked for a recommended switch that is IPTV friendly - I'm presuming they mean multicast aware etc. I have been down this road - don't waste your time with cheaper

[c-nsp] WS-X6148-RJ21 Ethernet Modules

Hello I was wondering if anyone has any experience using the RJ21 modules for 6500 Catalyst? Any good things to say? Any bad things to say? Regrets deploying it? This would be for access switches. Thank you, Tom ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] WLC discovery

Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?

you can use Paradyne DSLAMs or Alcatel ISAMs (IP DSLAMs) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:03:33 -0430 From: jcposei...@cantv.net To: cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ? Guys Does anyone of you knows a good DSLAM for HDSL ADSL ?

Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery

Hi, Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily

Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery

Thanks Mike for the the quick response. That means I have to have physical access to the APs which are already mounted on the ceiling. I am in the process of moving this AP to another subnet and I have some 18 of them to be moved from a single subnet to different subnets. I can see this AP

Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery

Hi, There is only one controller and I believe this is the master controller. DO you know, where I could check this? Thanks, Shine - Original Message - From: a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009

Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery

Boot the AP with the Mode button down to reset its parameter memory. If that doesn't help, hook into console and watch the messages. If that doesn't help, execute some 'debug [...]' statements on the same console. -porkchop On 6/10/09 4:42 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Hi,

Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery

Are you in Layer 2 or Layer 3 AP mode. I forget if this is the actual name, but you may need to switch to layer 3. Sent from handheld. On Jun 10, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Thanks Mike for the the quick response. That means I have to have physical

Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery

Yes it is in layer 3 mode - Original Message - From: Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au Cc: Kaegler, Mike kaegl...@tessco.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:30 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery Are you in Layer 2 or

Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery

Good call anyway, Ryan. Master mode will have no affect in this scenario, AFAIK. Master will only cause this controller to take priority over any other controllers if several share the same group, forcing new APs to land on the Master (knowing where they'd land makes for easier configuration

Re: [c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B

Check the config-register, as Aaron suggests, but also check the SP's config-register. #remote command switch show boot If the RP shows 0x2102 but the SP is something else, that could be the problem. To fix, go into config mode on the RP and re-enter the 0x2102 config-register, ^Z, then write

Re: [c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B

Check the config-register, as Aaron suggests, but also check the SP's config-register. #remote command switch show boot If the RP shows 0x2102 but the SP is something else, that could be the problem. To fix, go into config mode on the RP and re-enter the 0x2102 config-register, ^Z,

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?

On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Maxwell Reid wrote: you really only need specialized ASIC's as part of the forwarding plane of high end routers. When you're talking about DDoS, that's what's needed; general-purpose CPUs on boxes running many different VM/OS/app stacks, or things like ASAs

[c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis

I've been trying to spec Cisco for an upgrade of our Force10 backbone for nearly 2 months now. I'm just trying to clarify which platform Cisco recommends for full routing table/hardware forwarding/provider- class environments. Unfortunately every time I get through to the supposed right

Re: [c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis

On Jun 11, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Jo Rhett wrote: What are people using today for this kind of environment? GSR, ASR 1K, CRS-1 all work quite well. Avoid 6500/7600 for edge applications due to NetFlow, uRPF, ACL caveats (they're fine in the core).

[c-nsp] Location of 67xx rommon (c2lc-rm) images?

With the new and not so improved software download and documentation sites, does anyone know where to find rommon images and release notes for 6500 line cards? RP/SP images are linked under the 6500 download pages, but the only DFC-related link is for c6dfc3 (65xx/68xx DFC3, I believe). Thanks.

[c-nsp] need help.....

Why VLAN 0 is not configur in Switch where as starting range of VLAN is 0 and default VLAN is 1... -- Regards. Arup Bhattacharya GSM-9748238797 - Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts

Re: [c-nsp] Location of 67xx rommon (c2lc-rm) images?

Do a search for c2lc-rm2.srec.122-18r.S1 and you'll find many download locations. i.e.