[c-nsp] StackWise Plus performance

Hi I found in documentation that StackWise Plus is providing up to 64 Gbps of throughput. But is it full-duplex (then 128 Gbps half-duplex) or half-duplex (then 32Gbps full-duplex) ? Is it per one port ? Or both stack ports ? Rob ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] StackWise Plus performance

On 25/04/2012 13:18, Robert Hass wrote: I found in documentation that StackWise Plus is providing up to 64 Gbps of throughput. But is it full-duplex (then 128 Gbps half-duplex) or half-duplex (then 32Gbps full-duplex) ? Is it per one port ? Or both stack ports ? 64 gigs half duplex, and that

Re: [c-nsp] StackWise Plus performance

Hi, I found in documentation that StackWise Plus is providing up to 64 Gbps of throughput. But is it full-duplex (then 128 Gbps half-duplex) or half-duplex (then 32Gbps full-duplex) ? Is it per one port ? Or both stack ports ? just wondering why your company blocks access to google? ;-)

[c-nsp] lsd

Is there something similar in IOS to lsd (label switch db) found in IOS XR ? does this function of lsd exist in ios? (lsd seems like what I used to understand as lib/tib but unsure at this point). if there is an lsd-type thing in IOS, is there a way to see client apps (l2vpn, bgp, etc) bound to

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 09:44 -0500, Aaron wrote: Is there something similar in IOS to lsd (label switch db) found in IOS XR ? does this function of lsd exist in ios? (lsd seems like what I used to understand as lib/tib but unsure at this point). if there is an lsd-type thing in IOS, is there

[c-nsp] FWSM ACL présidence ? ACL not blocking traffic

We have tried the following on our test FWSM setup and it appears to break our original ACL used for blocking hosts. Nothing in the docs I have read states one ACL overrides the other. I have FWSM with OUTSIDE interface that has ACL-1 that is applied to both inbound and outbound traffic to

Re: [c-nsp] FWSM ACL présidence ? ACL not blocking traffic

what access-list commit mode are you using? my preferred practice is manual commit mode, but make changes on tftp server to acl and then upload entire acl with copy tftp running. at the start of the script is access-list mode manual and clear configure access-list blah. at the end of the script

Re: [c-nsp] FWSM ACL présidence ? ACL not blocking traffic

I am using MANUAL, so I then run the access-list commit config command. On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:24 , Jeffrey G. Fitzwater wrote: We have tried the following on our test FWSM setup and it appears to break our original ACL used for blocking hosts. Nothing in the docs I have read states one

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

Gee and I thought LSD was for the operator and not a feature. Nice, no reason the gear shouldn't share in the fun. :) On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 09:44 -0500, Aaron wrote: Is there something similar in IOS to lsd (label switch db) found in IOS

[c-nsp] I can't seem to get this 3750 to properly filter IPv6 on a VLAN ACL.

Here's what I'm working with. I'm filtering all ethertype 0x86DD which matches IPv6. I'm sniffing traffic leaving this VLAN and I can see that there's IPv6 traffic coming out and it does indeed have this ethertype. mac access-list extended macl-ipv6 deny any any 0x86DD 0x0 permit any any

Re: [c-nsp] I can't seem to get this 3750 to properly filter IPv6 on a VLAN ACL.

Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 09:58:34AM -0700, Paul Wozney wrote: Here's what I'm working with. I'm filtering all ethertype 0x86DD which matches IPv6. I'm sniffing traffic leaving this VLAN and I can see that there's IPv6 traffic coming out and it does indeed have this ethertype. mac

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

While MPLS hides the underlying topology from you, LSD is good for exposing the metaphysical layer. ;-) Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net writes: Gee and I thought LSD was for the operator and not a feature. Nice, no reason the gear shouldn't share in the fun. :) On Apr 25, 2012,

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

I know every time I'm at a laser light show and listening to Pink Floyd, I'm wondering how I could make this even better. Now I know - MPLS! Chuck -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert E. Seastrom Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

Now all we need is a feature called weed and another called mushrooms and you'd have my college years wrapped up in a single network element. On Apr 25, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Chuck Church wrote: I know every time I'm at a laser light show and listening to Pink Floyd, I'm wondering how I could

[c-nsp] cisco 867va

hi all i see on cisco 867va router interface and 'cd' lights blinking too much always; never this see in idle; the router is just used as vpn server; using another one as pppoe client elsewhere also behave the same way; i'm just curious about it; is there anybody out there with similar experience

[c-nsp] 15.2(2)S issues on 7600/SUP720

I'm testing 15.2(2)S on a couple of 7600/SUP720 combos and I've experienced some odd behaviour and I'm curious about whether or not anyone else has seen this. It's been really hard to reproduce, but it does happen once in a while, so I'm hoping similar experiences might give me some TAC

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

Aaron wrote: Is there something similar in IOS to lsd (label switch db) found in IOS XR ? does this function of lsd exist in ios? (lsd seems like what I used to understand as lib/tib but unsure at this point). if there is an lsd-type thing in IOS, is there a way to see client apps (l2vpn, bgp,

Re: [c-nsp] 15.2(2)S issues on 7600/SUP720

I've seen this on stacked 3750s when doing anything related to configurations, it would hang up hard enough to timeout EIGRP hellos from neighbors (and vice versa) causing general havoc everywhere. The workaround was to include parser config cache interface. During the hangs if you could get

Re: [c-nsp] iSCSI over wan?

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 23:14, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: What is the best practice around routing iSCSI? We have been asked about routing iSCSI traffic over our WAN. What are the pit falls that we need to be looking at? Hi, you should make sure you have guaranteed bandwidth and

[c-nsp] ME3400 QoS Output drops

I'm having an issue which I've been scratching my head about. I have a ME-3400G-12CS with a 5x gig-E Portchannel using Gi0/12 - 16 classifying and adding CoS markings for downstream devices connected via two 4x GigE Portchannels. I'm seeing output queue drops on both downstream portchannels.

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

Good 1 ;-) Sent from my iPad On 25 Apr 2012, at 17:15, Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net wrote: Gee and I thought LSD was for the operator and not a feature. Nice, no reason the gear shouldn't share in the fun. :) On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote: On Wed,

[c-nsp] MSTP between Cisco / Brocade

Have a single layer 2 connection between 7609, version 12.2(33)SRD4, 6708, with a 10G connection to Brocade. Using simplest form of MSTP, it works fine to a Brocade TI24X switch, running version 4 something. Move the same cable to a 10G port on a MLXe, version 5.2.0T165, the Cisco blocks the

Re: [c-nsp] I can't seem to get this 3750 to properly filter IPv6 on a VLAN ACL.

Hi Paul, mac access-list extended macl-ipv6 deny any any 0x86DD 0x0 permit any any IRC MAC ACLs on CAT2K/3K (12.2SE) only match non-IP traffic. IPv4 packets match only in the IP ACL, IPv6 packets match only in the IPv6 ACL. So even with a deny any any in the MAC ACL IPv4 and IPv6

Re: [c-nsp] MSTP between Cisco / Brocade

--- On Wed, 4/25/12, Steven Raymond sraym...@acedatacenter.com wrote: From: Steven Raymond sraym...@acedatacenter.com Subject: [c-nsp] MSTP between Cisco / Brocade To: cisco-nsp Service Providers cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 1:52 PM Have a single layer 2

Re: [c-nsp] MSTP between Cisco / Brocade

On Apr 25, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Randy wrote: I am not clear if you have 802.1s OR 802-1w enabled on the Brocade(care to post the stp output from Brocade?) sh run | i mstp mstp name acedc mstp revision 1 mstp instance 0 vlan 1 to 4090 mstp start

Re: [c-nsp] MSTP between Cisco / Brocade

--- On Wed, 4/25/12, Steven Raymond sraym...@acedatacenter.com wrote: From: Steven Raymond sraym...@acedatacenter.com Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MSTP between Cisco / Brocade To: Randy randy_94...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp Service Providers cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 3:03

Re: [c-nsp] 15.2(2)S issues on 7600/SUP720

After the problem do you see spikes in the CPU history? I believe most show commands run as a low priority process that can yield frequently, so it's possible something else is going on and the symptom is the slow terminal response time. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jason Lixfeld

[c-nsp] An observation: 512k default max-prefix in IOS-XR

Configuring some ASR9ks, and I noticed: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.2/routing/configuration/guide/b_routing_cg42asr9k_chapter_00.html#con_1088375 To prevent a peer from flooding BGP with advertisements, a limit is placed on the number of prefixes that are

[c-nsp] Difference between Partial Route Computation and iSPF

Hi, I would like to know is there any functional difference between PRC and iSPF as far as both OSPF and IS-IS is concerned. I know IS-IS had PRC feature inherent to its protocol as it has separate TLV for NLRI and topology information and OSPF was not. Introduction of iSPF made OSPF the same

[c-nsp] VRF-Lite and IPv6...

After playing with a lab switch (3560X) today looking at some IPv6 features, we discovered you can't really do IPv6 VRFs on it. The vrf definition configuration option doesn't like address-family at all, so no IPv4/IPv6 bits there. Is this an under consideration software function, or a

Re: [c-nsp] default-information IPv6 IOS-XR

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 22:03, henrry huaman henry.hua...@yahoo.es wrote: Hi guys, Please could help us, we need to send defaul route in IPv6 (IOS-XR). Hi Henry, I am guessing that you want to send a default route to a BGP peer. In this case, your syntax below will not work out. You are

[c-nsp] default-information IPv6 IOS-XR

Hi guys, Please could help us, we need to send defaul route in IPv6 (IOS-XR). And we have only this command in bgp proccess default-information originate. + r1-PE#sh run router bgp router bgp 65404  bgp router-id 1.1.1.1  default-information originate