How often is the flapping? 60s?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 9 Aug, 2012, at 3:07, Sebastian Wiesinger cisco-...@ml.karotte.org wrote:
* Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com [2012-08-08 18:30]:
Are this routes all running in the ospf and bgp at the same time? If yes, it
is a normal behaviour.
On 08.08.2012 07:14, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
I would recommend looking at the lower end ASR1Ks for that... Maybe ASR1001...
According to this Cisco doc:
http://www.ccsleeds.co.uk/kb/routers/cisco-vpn-throughput-comparison-doc.pdf
a 7200VXR G2 comes close to doing 1G (with 950 for either
Good morning,
I need to insert a route in the general routing table and in a VRF.
Reading on Internet,
I thought to use ip vrf receive command on the interface.
this is CS router :
hostname CS
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
ip cef
!
!
!
!
ip vrf VTC
!
interface Loopback1021030
ip vrf
Let's see the virtual-template. Our's has ppp multilink set in it.
Here it is, and ppp multilink is set:
multilink virtual-template 1
interface Virtual-Template1
ip unnumbered Loopback1
ip verify unicast reverse-path
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip tcp
Good morning,
I need to insert a route in the general routing table and in a VRF.
Reading on Internet,
I thought to use ip vrf receive command on the interface.
this is CS router :
hostname CS
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
ip cef
!
!
!
!
ip vrf VTC
!
interface Loopback1021030
ip vrf
Does the VTC vrf has a route for your ping source please?
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Luca Tortiglione
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:39 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] Problem with ip vrf
I have
ip route vrf VTC 10.208.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.210.0.5
and
ip route vrf VTC 10.210.3.0 255.255.255.0 10.210.0.6
and the other sources are directly connected networks, so no need to
add any other routes.
2012/8/9 adam vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk:
Does the VTC vrf has a route for
On 08/08/2012 08:07 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com [2012-08-08 18:30]:
Are this routes all running in the ospf and bgp at the same time? If yes, it is
a normal behaviour.
Hello,
as Gert pointed out, the networks are connected (I also have another
network,
* Randy randy_94...@yahoo.com [2012-08-08 21:35]:
...also curious:
If there is a discrepancy between sh ip cef perfix and sh ip
cef prefix internal for prefixes in question.
Here is the working prefix:
$ ping 10.1.66.51
PING 10.1.66.51 (10.1.66.51) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from
* Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com [2012-08-09 07:56]:
How often is the flapping? 60s?
No, random. Sometimes it takes hours for it to flap. Then it stays up
for hours again..
Regards
Sebastian
--
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S
* Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk [2012-08-09 11:28]:
On 08/08/2012 08:07 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com [2012-08-08 18:30]:
Are this routes all running in the ospf and bgp at the same time? If yes,
it is a normal behaviour.
Hello,
as Gert pointed out,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:02 PM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Emanuel Popa emanuel.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Emanuel Popa emanuel.p...@gmail.com
On 09/08/12 10:45, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
As far as I see, it looks OK. The problem lies somewhere deeper at the
hardware level.
Agreed.
It's been a while since I did this, but if you remote login module X
where X is the module receiving the traffic (if you're using a DFC) or
the slot
Xu, you didn't see the grep'd output ? :) see below.i was piping to
include only 30 sec
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Xu Hu [mailto:jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:21 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600 svi's not
Thanks Reuben. By efp's, I take it you mean the command structure for
Ethernet service instance, bride domain, etc. right ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Reuben Farrelly [mailto:reuben-cisco-...@reub.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:51 PM
To: Aaron
Cc:
Would be great if multicast worked corrected through the efp.
On 8/9/2012 10:19 AM, Aaron wrote:
Thanks Reuben. By efp's, I take it you mean the command structure for
Ethernet service instance, bride domain, etc. right ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Reuben Farrelly
I know RD and route-target are used only by BGP.
2012/8/9 Aaron aar...@gvtc.com:
Doesn't a vrf require an rd to even be functional?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Luca Tortiglione
Sent:
Hi Sebastian,
maybe due to load-sharing 10.1.66.51 takes other path back than 10.1.66.84? So
maybe one hop is missing a route or has a wrong one?
Just tapping in the dark because I didn't saw working traceroute forward and
backward.
Christian
___
* Christian Meutes christ...@errxtx.net [2012-08-09 16:49]:
Hi Sebastian,
maybe due to load-sharing 10.1.66.51 takes other path back than 10.1.66.84?
So maybe one hop is missing a route or has a wrong one?
Just tapping in the dark because I didn't saw working traceroute forward and
I know RD and route-target are used only by BGP.
Right, but even for vrf-lite, Cisco still require you to assign an RD before
the VRF becomes activated.
Regards,
Tim.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
If I understood it correctly than ip vrf receive VTC makes all the
interface addresses belong to the VRF VTC
Additionally you've specified a list of source addresses in ACL 100 -for
which the destination lookups should be done in the VTC VRF -in accordance
to the PC_TO_VTC route-map
Now I don't
All:
We are running a 3750 on 12.2(52)SE which terminates a 1G connection
from a metro Ethernet provider so that we can aggregate customer
Ethernet circuits based on vlan id and split them out on individual 100M
connections.
When we enable mls qos trust dscp on a customer-facing interface, the
I only have experience with Cisco WAAS but if you're on anything with
decent latency (10ms) they caused more (performance) problems for us than
they solved. For us the incremental cost of upgrading our bandwidth in most
locations was low enough that we didn't take WAAS out of the pilot (and we
I use riverbed steelhead appliances on a few links ranging from 40ms to 240ms.
I tend to get about 85% savings on actual traffic that goes through. I think
what is very important to know is the type of traffic you expect to optimize.
Riverbed is -very- good at MAPI and CIFS traffic, which is
On 8/9/2012 4:32 AM, Luca Tortiglione wrote:
!
route-map PC_TO_VTC permit 1
match ip address 100
set vrf VTC
I suspect you need to complete your route map... you set vrf VTC for VRF
targeted
traffic, you need another level with set global on the return side.
At least that's what I've done
15.2(2)S2 released today for this platform has this as a Fixed defect:
CSCtw79488
Symptoms: Multicast is not forwarded out on EVC.
Conditions: This has been observed with Cisco IOS Release 15.1(2)EY and
EY1a and with the following configuration:
So you may be in luck.
Reuben
On 10/08/2012
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
27 matches
Mail list logo
