Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X/ME3800X/ASR903 9K Interop CCO Design Guide Announcement

2013-11-02 Thread Mark Tinka
Many thanks, Waris. Cheers, Mark. On Friday, November 01, 2013 08:19:36 PM Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: Hi Team, Sometime back I had sent out an email with the subject ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback. Thank you for all your responses and

[c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Jeff Kell
I had the opportunity to open a TAC case last week... and was greeted by the new website... I use Firefox with NoScript, Ghostery, AdBlock, and some other plugins that require their own unique whitelisting to get cisco.com to work at all, and even more if you need to login to anything. I have

[c-nsp] ASA 8.4 error 305006 regular translation creation failed

2013-11-02 Thread Jeff Kell
Not having fun with TAC, let me ask the real experts :) ASA-5585X running 8.4(7), recent upgrade in response to last month's security advisories against the 8.4 code we were running... Now getting a number of the %ASA-3-305006 regular translation creation failed errors logged, typically for

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X/ME3800X/ASR903 9K Interop CCO Design Guide Announcement

2013-11-02 Thread Tim Durack
If only there were a Waris in every BU... On Saturday, November 2, 2013, Mark Tinka wrote: Many thanks, Waris. Cheers, Mark. On Friday, November 01, 2013 08:19:36 PM Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: Hi Team, Sometime back I had sent out an email with the subject

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Engel
Have you try using MS Explorer? Sent from my iPhone On 2013/11/03, at 7:53, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: I had the opportunity to open a TAC case last week... and was greeted by the new website... I use Firefox with NoScript, Ghostery, AdBlock, and some other plugins that require

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Jeff Kell
So Cisco is now sleeping with Microsoft? The human network suddenly requires Internet Explorer? And specific Java for the Oracle contingent? Years ago, it just worked. Might not have been HTML5 or Ajax or Web2.0 but the damned thing worked. Everytime. Jeff On 11/2/2013 9:23 PM, Engel wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread chris
Also make sure you use IE6, because apparently thats what most users prefer. Those pesky newer version and non MS browsers can be a real heachache. :) On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Engel engel.lab...@gmail.com wrote: Have you try using MS Explorer? Sent from my iPhone On 2013/11/03, at

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Richard Golodner
On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 21:37 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: So Cisco is now sleeping with Microsoft? When I read the original post it seemed to me that Cisco sure as you know what wanted you to use a Windows box to access their T.A.C. site. I really hope I am wrong because I will never

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Alex Presse
It's the new java update - unsigned code gets user verification windows. Cisco (and everybody else) will need to update all their java delivered user interfaces to avoid this annoyance. Sent from mobile; please excuse brevity typos. On Nov 2, 2013, at 19:46, chris tknch...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Jeff Kell
On 11/2/2013 11:20 PM, Alex Presse wrote: It's the new java update - unsigned code gets user verification windows. Cisco (and everybody else) will need to update all their java delivered user interfaces to avoid this annoyance. And we need Java to submit a case, exactly why? Plain old

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Sat, 2 Nov 2013, Jeff Kell wrote: I had the opportunity to open a TAC case last week... and was greeted by the new website... Try many of these same tasks on a Mac, and you get to add the great Apple/Oracle Java pissing contest on top of it. Fun times... :( It would be great if Cisco

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread chris
+1 for please remove the need for java or any plugins and go the elegance of simplicity On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: On 11/2/2013 11:20 PM, Alex Presse wrote: It's the new java update - unsigned code gets user verification windows. Cisco (and everybody

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Nov 3, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: It would be great if Cisco focus-group tested these 'enhancements' before rolling them out, and knock it off with the Java nonsense. They've been going in this direction for the last 10 years - it's doubtful that

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Jeff Kell
On 11/3/2013 12:52 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: On Nov 3, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: It would be great if Cisco focus-group tested these 'enhancements' before rolling them out, and knock it off with the Java nonsense. They've been going in this

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread John Neiberger
It would be great if Cisco focus-group tested these 'enhancements' before rolling them out, and knock it off with the Java nonsense. It was in beta for months before they released it publicly. I think the current version is vastly better than when I first saw it. But I guess they didn't have

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Octavio Alvarez
The annoyance could be avoided by removing Java requirements from the website. On 11/02/2013 08:20 PM, Alex Presse wrote: It's the new java update - unsigned code gets user verification windows. Cisco (and everybody else) will need to update all their java delivered user interfaces to avoid

Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...

2013-11-02 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Nov 3, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: If enough of us complain... maybe. Plenty of people inside and outside of Cisco have complained vociferously, to no avail. It's unlikely to change. --- Roland