Hi!
I have stack 3750G-48TS-S with c3750e-ipbasek9-mz.150-2.SE4
After rebooting I got this message
“Failed to send hrpc non-blocking message”
Read this here:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2139626
just a symptom of some other root cause.
Do you have link flapping?
Regards,
Unfortunately not. I already read this post. Any other suggestions?
On Nov 18, 2013 10:02 AM, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I have stack 3750G-48TS-S with c3750e-ipbasek9-mz.150-2.SE4
After rebooting I got this message
“Failed to send hrpc non-blocking message”
Read
I have Cisco CISCO7606-S (R7000) with 48 SFM-capable 48 port 10/100/1000mb
RJ45 moduleNow , I have 5 ports connected to my WiMAX ASN gateway via two vlans
one to the access side and the other one connected to the core sideThe issue am
facing now is some of the ports are into errdisable state
Hi all,
We are having a customer who says he can't forward BPDU packets over an
portbased EoMPLS using an ASR 901.
Is this something known or am I missing something? Relevant configuration;
interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1
description c_customer433231
no keepalive
xconnect x.x.x.x 1730
Hi Fredrik,
Please check the command l2protocol ? under interface config.
2013/11/18 Fredrik Vöcks fredrik.vo...@bredband2.se
Hi all,
We are having a customer who says he can't forward BPDU packets over an
portbased EoMPLS using an ASR 901.
Is this something known or am I missing
Do you still need to do that when it's a port-based pw?
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Dimitris Befas dimitris.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fredrik,
Please check the command l2protocol ? under interface config.
2013/11/18 Fredrik Vöcks fredrik.vo...@bredband2.se
Hi
Do you still need to do that when it's a port-based pw?
If you do, I'd say this is a bug. A port-based pseudowire shouldn't
care about L2 protocols or similar. It should just forward anything
it receives on the port into the pseudowire, and vice versa. With a
possible exception for Ethernet
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Kirill Bychkov kirill.bych...@gmail.comwrote:
ntp peer IP ADDRESS
Sometimes, after turnoff power, this line disappears from configuration.
I've seen similar behavior on IOS 12.x when the router is configured with
'ntp server name'
The problem there is that
Thank you for reply.
I write ip address of ntp server, not name server.
I found this CSCsx21595. At the document is written about BVI and loopback
interfaces, but I have a just FastEthernet.
I'll try to downgrade ios.
On 18 November 2013 17:53, Chris Marget ch...@marget.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov
l2protocol is not possible to configure under port-based pw.
Are there any other useful commands to see if the router is dropping
packets? The standard l2transport does not show any drops.
#show mpls l2transport vc 1730 detail
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 2676, send 19628
Hi Guys,
In a SP environment where there are hundreds of PEs and P devices that got
hundreds of customers VRFs, what is the best place to connect NTP sources.
The place i can think of is connecting with VPNv4 Route Reflectors because
they exist on top of hierarchy and so clock can travel
This all depends on what you need the clocking for.
If you want just generic time for accurate logs?
Depending on what you want to do, there's cheap NTP clocks like this:
http://www.netburnerstore.com/product_p/pk70ex-ntp.htm
For about $350 (including S/H in the US) you get a GPS clock. With
Have you tried to remove all portchannel config.
Shutdown all ports. Then only enable the ports you got a problem with ?
Or try with the ports that work and then add the other ports and check
the logs ??
Jey S.
Network Engineer
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Nov 2013, at 12:27, M K
Hi,
Im trying to do this on Version 15.3(3)S but the xconnect is rejected if I
enable l2protocol forward.
Which version are you succesfully doing this on?
(config-if-srv)# l2protocol forward
(config-if-srv)#xconnect x.x.x.x 1730 encapsulation mpls
Layer2 protocol tunnel/forward/peer
Hi,
I’m tearing my hair out with this one and can’t figure out how to resolve it.
I have 3 switches that have a BGP signalled VPLS with customer routers hanging
off the end of all 3 ( one switch has 2 cpe )
All have the RD 56595:4 and RT 56595:4
All pseudo wires are up between the switches
Since CISCO TECH will probably not touch this because its not CISCO, I see if
anybody has solution.
We are running nx-os 6.1.3 on 7k with sup-2E on a new chassis that will go into
production soon. We wanted to run the 6.2.2a to fix some other issues with
logging and found out the channel
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater wrote:
Since CISCO TECH will probably not touch this because its not CISCO, I
see if anybody has solution.
Backing out to 6.1.3 and all comes back to life.
Has anybody else sent his issue with third party transceivers?
I don't know if Cisco's
Hi,
The only way we could get the L2 forwarding going on ASR901 was using
a single service instance with encapsulation default (this only works
in newest software):
interface GigabitEthernet0/8
no ip address
negotiation auto
no keepalive
service instance 1 ethernet
encapsulation default
Thank Jared,
NTP is only needed to synchronize the logs so on event of failure, logs
from related devices can be correlated.
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
This all depends on what you need the clocking for.
If you want just generic time
Hi,
I assume here you're running ME3600x. Split horizon works by stopping
any packets that arrived on one pseudowire from leaving on another
pseudowire. Attachment circuit to another attachment circuit is not
affected (unless you make add them to another split-horizon group
manually).
Can you
Hi - Trying to confirm the L3 performance of the ME3600X...I see in one
datasheet
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps6568/ps10956/data_sheet_c78-601946.html),
65 Mpps (forwarding rate) is listed?
Cheers.
Issues I was having with BGP signalled VPLS a couple of months ago in 15.3(2)S1
resulted in filing CSCui46390. I'd otherwise suggest trying 15.3(3)S1a to see
fix works, but that version seems to have introduced CSCuh05321, so I think
that might end badly for you; it did for me :(
On Nov 18,
Hi Pshem,
output below
switch 1
Local intf Local circuit Dest addressVC ID Status
- -- --- -- --
VFI FLVPLS004 vfi46.226.0.9 4 UP
VFI FLVPLS004 vfi
Hi Jason,
It sounds very similar. If a bgp session was established direct rather than
via an RR would this fix it I wonder?
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 19 Nov 2013, at 02:02,
As far as I understood from talking to the developers, the BGP issues were
inside platform independent code, so I'd presume it wouldn't be XR specific,
but don't hold me to that.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 18, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Nick Ryce n...@fluency.net.uk wrote:
Hi Jason,
It sounds
Doesn’t make a diff if established direct :(
On 19 Nov 2013, at 02:46, Nick Ryce
n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk wrote:
Hi Jason,
It sounds very similar. If a bgp session was established direct rather than
via an RR would this fix it I wonder?
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency
Just found 1 switch on 15.3(2)S so may be worth a punt and upgrade
Nick
On 19 Nov 2013, at 02:02, Jason Lixfeld
ja...@lixfeld.camailto:ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
Issues I was having with BGP signalled VPLS a couple of months ago in 15.3(2)S1
resulted in filing CSCui46390. I'd otherwise suggest
Hey guys,
I am struggling to understand if I can upgrade the internal bootflash
module on a WS-SUP720-3B, to 512mb (from 64mb).
According to cisco.com it can be upgraded but it also mentions using a
compact flash card, but does not say that this is the only option. I have
upgraded the internal
Just be mindful of CSCuh05321 if you are going to try S1a. If you think you
might hit that, I'd suggest moving to static vpls and skip that release until
it's fixed.
Also, with S1a, look at CSCtl54835 and verify or else your isis adjacencies
will break.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 18, 2013,
Thanks for the link and the replies guys!
I see that to upgrade the internal module you need to CF adapter, I think
this is where my reseller was confusing me as they didn't mention this.
I guess then I can just use the disk0 slot in the front of the sup720 and
boot the image from this instead?
What normally happens is you put a helper image on bootflash: and install a
CF/PCMCIA flash card in disk0: or disk1: to hold the main boot image
On 19 Nov 2013, at 2:56 pm, Adam Fitzgerald a...@wiredrevolution.com.au wrote:
Thanks for the link and the replies guys!
I see that to upgrade the
31 matches
Mail list logo
