Re: [c-nsp] Event Manager Script

2014-03-05 Thread M K
Hi , thanks and sorry for the late replyI am facing some issues with the script , when the IP SLA is down , the router did not wait for the 5 minutes , it reloaded directly From: oboeh...@cisco.com To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Event Manager Script

Re: [c-nsp] Event Manager Script

2014-03-05 Thread Jeyamurali Sivapathasundaram
In IP SLA you can set the reaction-configuration thresholds. Try that. Jey S. Network Engineer CCIE #41608 Sent from my iPhone On 5 Mar 2014, at 08:32, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote: Hi , thanks and sorry for the late replyI am facing some issues with the script , when the IP SLA is down

Re: [c-nsp] Event Manager Script

2014-03-05 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
can you just remove the action 2.0 reload from the script for the test so the router just spits out the syslog and then send the logs? I noticed that the maximum delay down value accepted by the parser is 180 (3 minutes), maybe it didn't accept the command when you pasted it? I just tested this

Re: [c-nsp] Event Manager Script

2014-03-05 Thread amir agha
Hi Try with 120 seconds delay. Also use environment variable to depicting to get email whensoever event triggers. Ami On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 10:01 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com wrote: can you just remove the action 2.0 reload from the script for the test so the

[c-nsp] (no subject)

2014-03-05 Thread Olivier CALVANO
Hi A small question please, on Cisco ME3400/3800 With this config: interface GigabitEthernet0/15 switchport trunk allowed vlan none switchport mode trunk speed 100 duplex full no cdp enable service instance 11 ethernet encapsulation dot1q 1-4094 bridge-domain 909 ! The cisco

[c-nsp] Cisco mem issue

2014-03-05 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Has anyone experienced the recently announced mem issue? http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory.html affected parts: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory_pu.html Proposed fix-on-fail solution seems risky. -- Tassos

Re: [c-nsp] (no subject)

2014-03-05 Thread Vitkovský Adam
Hi Oliver Not by default, You'd have to enable l2protocol forward/peer under the service instance adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Olivier CALVANO Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:41 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco mem issue

2014-03-05 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 05/03/2014 12:32, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: Has anyone experienced the recently announced mem issue? http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory.html affected parts: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory_pu.html Proposed fix-on-fail solution seems risky.

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers

2014-03-05 Thread Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20140305-wlc Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2014 March 5 16:00 UTC (GMT) Summary === The Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) product family is affected

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Small Business Router Password Disclosure Vulnerability

2014-03-05 Thread Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Small Business Router Password Disclosure Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20140305-rpd Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2014 March 5 16:00 UTC (GMT

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco mem issue

2014-03-05 Thread Vinny_Abello
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential I wasn't aware of this announcement, but we did experience this on a software upgrade of a 6506-E almost a year ago where a perfectly working WS-X6724-SFP wouldn't boot after a reload of the switch last summer. We just replaced it and considered it a one off

[c-nsp] OAM/CFM question on IOS-XR

2014-03-05 Thread Herro91
Hi, I've been working on a basic configuration for E-OAM starting with one domain. I have CFM working between the PEs (IOS-XR) devices tied to an EoMPLS instance, but have a few questions below: 1) I think I should be seeing MIPs in my traceroute when there is a P router in between the two PEs,

[c-nsp] EIGRP potentially silly question...

2014-03-05 Thread Jeff Kell
After a deployment of EIGRP with the intent of providing link utilization based load-sharing as opposed to round robin, I get the rude awakening that the default k-values for EIGRP do NOT include link utilization. Any shortcuts / workarounds / etc to resetting k-values site-wide without breaking

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP potentially silly question...

2014-03-05 Thread Alex Pressé
Nope. And to top it off DUAL only runs on link state events - so if one link suddenly gets saturated the router won't recalculate the metric and split traffic up - unless something else in the network happens (cycle an interface, add a route, soft-reset EIGRP). On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:22 PM,

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP potentially silly question...

2014-03-05 Thread Alex Pressé
You could create a second EIGRP process with a value for K2 router eigrp 2 metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0 Any identical routes in this second new instance of EIGRP will have a higher metric than the original EIGRP process. And thusly will NOT be installed in the routing table - provided they are

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP potentially silly question...

2014-03-05 Thread quinn snyder
something like pfr[0] may be useful in this instance, assuming the kit can run it. on newer kit, pfr-v2 is much less sucky than the pfr of old. q. [0] http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/PfR:Solutions:BasicLoadBalancing#PfR_Features_that_Enable_Load_Balancing -= sent via ipad. please excuse