This may help with your issue:
Q. What is the difference between the SP and RP bootflash/bootdisk?
A. SP bootflash/bootdisk is the location from where the system can load and
boot a Cisco IOS Software image. The more SP bootflash/bootdisk space you have,
the greater the number of Cisco IOS
This may help with your issue:
Q. What is the difference between the SP and RP bootflash/bootdisk?
A. SP bootflash/bootdisk is the location from where the system can load and
boot a Cisco IOS Software image. The more SP bootflash/bootdisk space you have,
the greater the number of Cisco IOS
Are you sure is not just your filtering at the show route ospf command, that
leads you to believe there you only send over the 2nd bundle?
From the show ip route command it looks like both paths are installed and
you are sending traffic over both paths equally.
Did you try the following config:
if strict mode configured, your best path must be on the interface you receive
the traffic
if loose mode, the source address must appear in the routing table
i believe the phrase you're referring is taken out of context, relative to your
question:
--- cite --
The behavior of strict RPF varies
for the bulk feature-set, try c7200-advipservicesk9-mz.151-4.M2.bin (older) or
c7200-advipservicesk9-mz.151-4.M3.bin (unfortunately deferred) and then look at
the release notes on
c7200-advipservicesk9-mz.151-4.M4.bin (which is Maintenance Deployment
release), to see any resolved caveats
Are you referring to Cat6500 VSS 1440 system?
If yes, I am using them in a few production and non-production environments and
do NAT on them too.
Here's my setup, trimmed to outline the NAT:
!
interface Loopback1001
only for fixing:
maybe add to your list sh run inter tu0 , sh run inter tu2, etc for all
your mysterious tunnels and a sh run full, edit to remove any trace of
mystery, copy it as startup-config in your nvram,
then reload the router.
if you want to go to extremes, you can erase the config all
