On 07/01/2019 17:00, Saku Ytti wrote:
Hey,
I somewhat recently discovered https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5837
Exec summary: your traceroute will show the ingress ifindex where
packet came in, allowing you to discriminate LAG/bundle/ae interfaces
and determine actual path in network with ease.
On 02/08/17 13:10, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>> Am 02.08.2017 um 12:05 schrieb Mark Tinka :
>> On 2/Aug/17 11:58, Gert Doering wrote:
>>> This is what we currently do for "BGP edge", and I totally love the
>>> box. Even though software updates are as annoying,
If no ip tcp path-mtu-discovery set, TCP MSS will be 538, unless you set
ip tcp mss.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp/command/iap-cr-book/iap-i2.html#wp2736852187
It seems it was always was disabled since its introduction.
On 22/04/16 16:59, Sebastian Beutel wrote:
> Hi
Search list for details, you need to look for output
show controllers np ports all location 0/0/CPU0
show controllers np counters np1 location 0/0/CPU0 | i DROP|DISCARD|NOT
On 14 мая 2015 г., at 22:04, Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote:
We have an ASR 9010 running IOS-XR v 5.1.3.
Go with ASR9001 if you planning to grow. Yes it cost more than ASR1002X
but if you need pure border ASR9001 is absolute power house.
And we love IOS XR because of readability of long route-policy. Sorry
IOS-XE you still suck when there is lots BGP neighbors configuration and
config become wall of
It's usually same memory from same vendor/supplier just different label.
On 20.03.2015 20:51, Adam Greene wrote:
Besides the risk of not being able to obtain support from Cisco (and maybe
being billed by them) if a problem is traced to the third-party RAM
1,000,000 limit is FIB which is only best routes(500K+ routes), RIB only
consume RAM.
You'll be fine with 8Gb memory, but if you plan to use non-cisco memory,
just go with 16Gb its cheap. 16Gb will be enough to store 25M routes as
Route-Server last I heard from Cisco.
IOSd will only consume half
Victor,
From last time remember when we do changes on C3560X and any previous
models it involves to change system mtu command, and new setting only
apply after reboot (ASIC re-init)
On 24.01.2015 13:17, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
I have a network of about twenty C3560X switches
Hey,
Does anyone have DOM information in SNMP on IOS XR (ASR9001)? All we got
is -32768 on all modules. So far we only tested on 4.3.2, just wonder if
they actually fixed on more recent releases.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
by default IOS XR won't accept or announce anything, unless you
configure route-policy. prefix-list and route-map from IOS can be
configured in one route-policy just fine.
prefix-set AS655535
192.0.2.0/24
end-set
Route-policy AS655535
if destination in AS655535 then
pass
else
drop
On 29/11/13 15:09, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
c7201(config-if)#ip flow monitor IPv4 sampler SM input
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Try this:
c7201(config-if)#ip flow monitor IPv4 sampler ?
or
c7201(config-if)#ip flow monitor IPv4
Only exception is new cat 3650, with 12Mb buffer, which is double amount
from previous generation with just 6Mb shared buffer.
On 09/12/13 16:54, Phil Mayers wrote:
One important thing to bear in mind: All the cheap Catalyst devices,
including 3750, have tiny tiny buffers, so tend to drop
On 09.12.2013 17:55, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Didn’t IOS 15 introduce a completely new and rather burdensome licensing
mechanism?
http://etherealmind.com/ios-15-licensing-how-we-work/
Well thing is, that they did have plans and even implement this on their
low-end hardware like ISR routers
Hey,
Trying to configure sampled v9 netflow with 15.1S on 7201 and I can't
make it sampled, still 1:1.
What I'm missing?
flow exporter AS-STATS
destination 10.10.90.5
transport udp 9000
!
flow monitor IPv4
record netflow ipv4 original-input
exporter AS-STATS
cache timeout active 300
!
On 29/11/13 14:37, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Nov 29, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
flow monitor IPv4
record netflow ipv4 original-input
exporter AS-STATS
cache timeout active 300
flow monitor IPv6
record netflow ipv6 original-input
exporter AS-STATS
cache
On 29/11/13 14:59, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
Any NetFlow, sampled or non-sampled.
Set the active timer to 60s, and the inactive timer to 5s.
Even when you draw graph in 5 min interval? As lowering values means
more flows exported per min so more load.
c7201(config-if)#ip flow monitor IPv4
OOB console access
On 20 нояб. 2013 г., at 10:23, Preston Chilcote (pchilcot)
pchil...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm curious: Does anyone use one or more raspberry pis in their network
(for networking related stuff)? What kinds of things are they used for?
Thanks,
Preston
Then mark all your and your customers prefixes with community and
announce only these marked.
On 15/11/13 09:49, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Just using prefix-lists has drawbacks as well, since customers who are
no longer customers can end up being transited to your network because
you now
Isn't paperback license exist for this exact reason, as opposite to
e-delivery?
On 30/08/13 12:30, Rolf Hanßen wrote:
Hello Blake,
the question was more the other direction:
How do I prove/verify I have a valid license if I receive nothing that
says here is your Cisco license #xx for
Its fits same 16Gb memory, if talking about ram :)
On 29.08.2013 19:38, Tony Varriale wrote:
Also note the memory restriction on the 1001 compared to a RP2 system.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Its limited to 4Gb memory, even if you able add more, RP1 running i386
image not x86-64.
On 29.08.2013 20:05, Antoine Monnier wrote:
Could you give me more details on why you would stay away from systems with
RP1 such as the 1002?
___
cisco-nsp
SNMP seems lagging behind, doesn't report any IPv6 addresess on
interfaces though on this release.
On 10.08.2013 7:40, Tim Durack wrote:
Answering my own question: 15.2(4)JA1 is now available, supporting IPv6
management.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
Nick,
modular ESP5 and integrated into 1002 have limitation of 512K, while
ASR1001 have 1M.
On 02/08/13 14:52, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 02/08/2013 11:29, Olga wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong
It's more complicated than this on the asr1000 platform. See the archive
for more details.
Nick
It can take 1M routes, you just need at least 8G memory. And if you need
4 full bgp you need 8G memory anyway.
You can fit 3 full bgp in 4G memory but it will be 98-99%.
On 01/08/13 10:09, Hitesh Vinzoda wrote:
i know that it has limitation of 512k for fib
Hey,
ISP announce two separate /64 prefixes via DHCP-PD. I import them using
ipv6 dhcp client pd ISP6_PREFIX. Then using command ipv6 address
ISP-PREFIX ::1/64 to assing it on lan interface.
And its assign both prefixes on interface and thus all machines have 2
separate IPv6 addresses in both
No latest 15.1M doesn't allow it too.
On 25.06.2013 20:54, David Hubbard wrote:
simply an
ios issue and that 15.1T possibly adds this feature.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
I understand its CPU not that fast as XEON on ASR1K-RP2, but just
wondering how fast it is for bgp full view convergence?
On 4/25/13 1:26 AM, LavoJM wrote:
Anyway, the 9k is a powerhouse and we love them. Highly recommended.
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Hey guys,
So we are looking for router which have 10Gbe interfaces (able push
10-20Gbit), with mostly basic stuff, full bgp, dot1.q.
So at first I've look into 1002-X, which is seems fit use enough (with
license upgrade). Looking into GPL price I see asr9001 will be much
cheaper than fully
Will increase MTU from standard 1500 to 9000 will lower load on
software based routers (ISR/ISR2, 7200)? Lets assume average packet size
will be much larger than 1500.
And since there less pps, load should be lower or I miss something?
___
cisco-nsp
ASR1001 have their own designed RP something between RP1 and RP2 by
performance of CPU, its Dual-Core 2.2GHz.
RP1 is 1.5GHz Freescale 8548
RP2 is Dual-Core 2.66GHz (XEON)
On 22/03/13 12:40, Christian Kratzer wrote:
Hi,
we a have a pair of ASR1001 with 4GB ram and want to max them out with 8
/sites/default/files/seminar_attachments/anidlis.asr_.1000.archtecture.v0.4.pdf
On 07/02/13 06:12, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-450070.html
cisco.com/go/asr1000 - data sheets
It separately states 24M VPN IPv4 routes, so just 1M less. ;)
On 07/02/13 16:04, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
As some presentation PDFs says RP2 can handle 25M as route reflector.
Wow so from ASR1004 and upwards we're indeed not limited by the number of VPN
routes anymore so goodbye RR Planes (I'm
, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
ESP5 comes with 512K FIB, while ASR1001 which has also ESP5 integrated
have 1M FIB.
I'm still putzing around the Cisco site, where are you finding these detailed
specs? I'm trapped in some link loop that's only giving me the most basic
specs…
And while I'm here
http://www.ebay.com/itm/M-ASR1K-1001-16GB-16GB-4X4GB-Dram-Memory-for-Cisco-ASR-1001-Series-/190654008152?pt=US_Enterprise_Router_Memoryhash=item2c63dd4b58
Working for us just fine
On 06.01.2013 4:02, Robert Hass wrote:
I want extend ASR1001 memory to 8GB or best 16GB but at low possible
cost -
ESP5 comes with 512K FIB, while ASR1001 which has also ESP5 integrated
have 1M FIB.
On 06.01.2013 16:26, Robert Hass wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Scott Pettit spet...@end2end.co.nz wrote:
Hmm, perhaps I was incorrect - the old ESP2.5 appears to have been made
End of Sale since July
Hey,
Is there any limitation on integrated gig interfaces? Can I push 900Mbit
on it? I know PA-1GE= have such limitation because of PCI bus IIRC, also
gig0/3 + fa0/0 have their own weirdness (CSCty34020).
We currently doing 700-800Mbit duplex on one of interfaces and I seems
hitting invisible
We run 3 full tables on 1Gb.
On 17/10/12 11:02, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
Will 1GB support 2 full tables?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Max ram load is about 62%, plus we run about 25K additional routes here.
As its software based router, CPU pretty much depend of how much traffic
it pass.
On 17/10/12 13:05, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
Thanks - What is your ram(+CPU) utilisation?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:01:34
If you have default snmp config on 2960, there nothing additional need
to pass interface names. Its in ifAlias not in ifDescr
On 02.10.2012 23:46, Michael Sprouffske wrote:
What needs to be done in order for the switch to pass the descriptions of the
interfaces. I looked at a debug and the
.10005 = FastEthernet0/5
ifType.10005 = 6
From: Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2012 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco 2960 snmp interface description
If you have default snmp config
Hey,
Just wondering does ASR routers need advanced ip services to route IPv6
traffic? Feature navigator report mostly says yes, as IPv6 support on
base image is pretty much limited or better say non-existent.
Can anyone confirm/deny?
___
cisco-nsp
Sorry forgot to add, ASR1K
On 17/09/12 16:11, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hey,
Just wondering does ASR routers need advanced ip services to route IPv6
traffic? Feature navigator report mostly says yes, as IPv6 support on
base image is pretty much limited or better say non-existent.
Can anyone
L2TPv3 need data license, while L2TP available even w/o data license, if
nothing changed since introduction of ISR G2 licenses.
On 30.08.2012 19:56, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
You should be able to deploy L2TPv3 with the smaller ISR routers... The 800
series support it (not sure what
On 11/07/12 02:19, Peter Rathlev wrote:
The yellow threshold, as you probably already know, is 51°C for the
WS-C3560G-24PS-S (at least V06). My interpretation is that operating
below 51°C means everything is just fine.
Well for 48 port version yellow threshold is 56°C at least what it says
Hi,
Just wondering what's normal temperature for 3560G, we have 3560X-24,
with 35°C, and 3560G running at 48-49°C. From thresholds I see it have
much higher then -X version, but it still bothers me, if its normal.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hey,
SA-ISA EoL few years ago, and announcement[1] says last supported
release is 12.4 mainlaine. So I wonder if anyone can confirm/deny will
it work on 15.1M release? And doesn't SA-VAM2+ doesn't fits here because
of amount of traffic I need to cover, and price.
[1]
Boot buffersize change size of nvram simulate file, there no nvram all files
stored on flash.
On 06.04.2012, at 0:43, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net wrote:
Hey Skeeve,
Re config size, have you thought about using service compress-config?
This might help to reduce the config size by about
Hi,
So we just replaced some aging c3524XL with 2960S and suddenly start
seeing output drops on one of port facing client, while 3524 never had
output drops to this client.
Traffic levels pretty much low like 1-2mbit with 200-300pps levels. I
believe this is because uplink now 1Gbit, but
0 unknown protocol drops
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
On 04.04.2012 21:58, Piotr Wojciechowski wrote:
On 4/4/12 18:35 , Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hi,
So we just replaced
On 04.04.2012 23:08, Piotr Wojciechowski wrote:
On 4/4/12 20:54 , Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 2197
It seems that you might have traffic peaks on this interface. It happens
when traffic received from 1000BaseTx interface
Well Output Interpreter usually your friend, since I don't have your
crashinfo file i just paste your error. This is what it says:
%ERR-1-FATAL: Fatal error interrupt
Explanation: This error message indicates a Hardware problem in the device.
Recommended Action: To troubleshoot try this:
1.
Pretty much everything is here
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/15.0_1_se/release/notes/OL25301.html
On 21/03/12 11:13, Garry wrote:
On 21.03.2012 00:52, Thomason, Simon wrote:
Not certain if anyone is looking into smart install or vstack but when you
On 06/03/12 17:51, Chuck Church wrote:
I'm curious what the default NAT timeouts for IOS-XE are. A lot of the
normal IOS ones are 24 hours, which is WAY too long for dynamic large scale
use. An hour is much more reasonable.
As soon IOS NAT sees close/fin or fin/ack bits, it set session to 5
Victor,
Because UDP is a connectionless protocol, fragmented UDP packets will be
dropped if they arrive at the destination out of order. And most common
sense is switch to TCP.
And did you tried add ip inspect name FOO fragment?
On 17/02/12 09:04, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
I have
2Gb for internal purpose, it just over-top IMO. I can't think out
anything what can use that 2Gb of memory on router, just for internal
purposes.
On 01/02/12 06:04, Mark Tinka wrote:
If you have 4GB DRAM in the router, IOSd itself will take
2GB and the other 2GB will be used for internal
On 18/01/12 10:14, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
nfdump/nfsen is a good open-source set of tools to use in getting started with
flow telemetry, IMHO.
Seconded with Roland words. We find nfdump pretty much solid and with
nfsen is good tool for detecting anomalies.
Hi Jeff,
Just marketing move to make them sane I believe. If you run pre
12.2.(55)SE releases be aware that (55) release actually huge compare to
others, so more memory will be eaten.
We running 15.0(1)SE on 3560x, no problem so far we aware of.
On 05.01.2012 6:27, Jeff Kell wrote:
After
Hi list,
Right now looking for new access switches, with 24 copper 1gig ports +
4 SFP ports. We don't really need any fancy features, and from datasheet
I can tell WS-C2970G-24TS, fits us very well.
I know this is EOL already and replaced with WS-C2960G-24TC-L, which
recently replaced with
I've noticed WS-C2970G-24TS actually 1,5U, while other model just 1U. So
I wonder if there any overheating issues?
On 28/12/11 18:01, Joe Maimon wrote:
Works for me in a number of locations. I have seen about one out of 20
go bad.
So get some spares.
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hi list,
Right
On 28/12/11 23:02, Mike wrote:
On 12/28/2011 05:16 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hi list,
Right now looking for new access switches, with 24 copper 1gig ports +
4 SFP ports. We don't really need any fancy features, and from datasheet
I can tell WS-C2970G-24TS, fits us very well.
I know
Hey,
We had something similar with 2950, which is really bug CSCeb04463. So
basically switch working perfectly fine but at some moment (random) it
will decide to hang.
I cannot say if this is your case, but maybe worth check.
On 19/12/11 14:40, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:
Hi all,
For
-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:
Hello,
And how have you been able to solve this issue/bug?
I guess you did an IOS upgrade? To which version?
Thanks for your help :)
-Original Message-
From: Nikolay Shopik [mailto:sho...@inblock.ru]
Sent: lundi 19 décembre 2011 11:59
To: Henry-Nicolas Tourneur; cisco
I'd say if he really want to go cheap, IP base probably do fine, only
difference is no BGP in it. Adv.IP services license cost half of
hardware while ipbase few hundered $.
On 16/12/11 12:27, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
The cheapest
option you have would probably be a WS-3560, but you'll need an
You are having faulty patch-cord, replace it and you should be fine.
On 08/12/11 14:01, Wakwa Nduati wrote:
On the main device I get on both interfaces
f0/0 136 unknown protocol drops
f0/1 31 unknown protocol drops
On the connecting switch
Input: 1350 input errors, 0 runts, 0 giants, -
Seen these kind problems, I'm just put all sh ver output + traceback,
and then it start decoding for me.
On 29.11.2011 22:53, Michael Chomicz wrote:
I'm trying to perform a traceback decode.
This is what I'm inputting:
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software
We are upgraded from 12.2 into 15.0 in last year, and few months back
upgraded to 15.1 to get some new voice features. We are running on NPE-G1.
Only thing we notice is because we upgraded from some old 12.2 image
have to rewrite some parts of config, which isn't upgraded automatically.
On
Hey,
I've got two borders connected via ibgp, both receving full-view via
uplinks, and I notice one of borders receiving about 190K prefixes via
ibgp. But I'm clearly sure there no filters at all.
Configuration between borders are pretty simple and consist just two lines.
neighbor x.x.x.x
Hi,
I have rather strange best path selection. We have 3 uplinks, AS_PATH to
one of prefix is same for all 3 prefixes, so my assumption it will use
oldest one, because everything else is same. Except one thing I notice
one of uplinks send us metric, while two others does not.
Here is
You sure talking about MED not local preference? And what's point of MED
as it non-transitive. No AS behind my uplinks will see these MED anyway
only with whom I peer directly.
On 11/10/11 14:05, Saku Ytti wrote:
Anyhow personally I would not rely on router-id or route-age, but
would use MED
Nope, only non default command we have under router bgp is no bgp
enforce-first-as
On 11/10/11 14:29, Андрей Андреев wrote:
did you have
bgp bestpath med missing-as-worst
?
11.10.2011 13:18, Nikolay Shopik пишет:
Hi,
I have rather strange best path selection. We have 3 uplinks
Does anyone receiving such deferred message or/and rejection after 5
days queue expired?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Status: 4.2.0
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:39:29 -0500 (CDT)
Will-Retry-Until: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:30:13 -0500 (CDT)
On 11.10.2011 19:05, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Does anyone receiving such deferred message or/and rejection after 5
days queue expired
On 11.10.2011 19:17, Pete Templin wrote:
Are you sure the first one is oldest and the second one is youngest? I
was under the impression that IOS always presents paths in newest(top)
to oldest(bottom) sequence, which explains why the bottom one is chosen.
I can't say for sure (cisco doesn't
Hey,
I'm trying to configure basic stuff, like policing by mac address on
router and it doesn't match any packets.
class-map match-any shopik
match access-group 700
policy-map ultraspeed
class shopik
police 8000 2000
interface FastEthernet1/1
service-policy input ultraspeed
access-list
Hey,
I'm wonder what's up with access to IOS software for EOL/EOS hardware
for example 3600 router serises EOL is 31 dec 2008. Downdload section
still saying I need contract to download, while it's been EOS for years.
Maybe I miss something and it not completely EOS?
Yes we still using
Martin,
Yes, you right, my mistake, we are using C3KX-NM-10G, and at time when
we bough it there no C3KX-NM-10GT modules, so I automatically think them.
You probably won't able to do so, because we even had problems with size
of regular SFP(not rj45) on C3KX-NM-10G, so we had to replace them
Hey Dustin,
We seen similar issue but with NAT enabled and that was on 12.4(15)T14,
where first TCP SYN drops. Check bug CSCti13229.
On 26/09/11 02:01, Dustin Schuemann wrote:
We have about 200 sites connected to us via GRE tunnels over IPSEC over MPLS
for primary connectivity, and GRE over
If bgp connection timeout or reset from remote side, it will not try
establish it but instead wait other side start TCP connection, am I
correctly understood that command?
On 06/09/11 14:03, Jon Harald Bøvre wrote:
could be transport connection-mode passive will help, for one side of the
Hi,
Does Cat3560-X support qinq? Some old threads says most Cat3K does such
support but feature navigator doesn't say so clearly about that.
I check if command switchport mode dot1q-tunnel there, but apparently
it not. This is lanbase license, do I need ipabase for that?
There some defaults changed to something which cause your high CPU. You
may take a look for this (Cisco IOS Behavior Changes).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/15_0/release/notes/150MNEWF.html#wp1030987
On 23.08.2011 20:15, Chris Gotstein wrote:
Update on this issue:
After combing the
Yeah I miss this one, thanks a lot!
On 04.08.2011 22:07, Jean-Etienne Kelly wrote:
Do you have this line on the top part of your running-config ?
mls qos
QoS will not work without it. I've done the same error.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
I'm trying to configure service policy on interface but it seems not
working at all. While same config working on old 2950. Here is sample of
it. 2960 running on 12.2(55)SE3. Any ideas?
policy-map 10Mbit
class class-default
police 1000 512000 exceed-action drop
interface
: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andriy Bilous
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 10:09 AM
To: Nikolay Shopik
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] service-policy on 2960 doesn't shape
'show policy-map interface' just doesn't work
Hi,
Is there way to redefine reject code when max connections reached on
voip dial-peer? Currently its no circuit/channel available, but we would
like to prefer 17 - user busy.
I could re-map all isdb failure codes using isdn network-failure-cause
17, but this seems not so good idea when real
On 21/07/11 03:56, Tony Varriale wrote:
No one cares as much as it is a software platform :)
I'd say this give almost no benefits for such platform also. And if they
decide to give us XE, this is probably cost money on ISR-G2. Most likely
XE not happen until ISR-G3 and this is what I call
It's kinda sad 2960 switches don't have memory reserve console
command, which will allow you to run some diagnostic commands. Sometimes
when memory leaks happens there tracerbacks actually logged, so I
suggest enable syslog logging on switches, so you can see all logging
stuff, before it run
Hey,
I wounder what current BCP for filtering AS of our customers? Currently
we don't accept announces of our downstreams via uplinks and IX. But I
believe this is not ideal scenario, loosing connection to downstream
means, our network loosing connection to this network and all AS behind
Yeah, my bad, didn't search propertly.
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2011-May/078711.html
On 04/07/11 12:53, Gert Doering wrote:
This has been discussed in quite some detail here about 6 weeks ago.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Well it's really depends, but I tend to agree, my show crypto engine
accelerator statistic, 1.8:1 compression ratio and overall is 1.1:1.
On 30/06/11 18:59, P C wrote:
Traditional applications of this have been low speed links (Dial-up, ISDN,
etc.). I've never tried it on anything faster. I
-console-ports
Hope this helps
Ziv
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jim McBurnett
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 7:58 PM
To: Nikolay Shopik; cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Console cables on new platforms
Hey everyone,
We just received our 3560X and no console cables included at all, is
this new policy for new platforms?
I mean no RS-232-RJ45 or new mini-usb console cable at all.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 28/06/11 13:26, Peter Rathlev wrote:
They still have a regular console port (RJ45 connector, serial) so the
cables used for all other recent Cisco devices can be re-used.
Yeah that's not problem, we have spare cables from old device. Rarely
but sometimes you need cable/per device. When you
On 28/06/11 14:05, Tim Franklin wrote:
I believe it's now a zero-cost option, along with things like the pack of
documentation.
So you basically need add another part-number(which on btw?) to your
order and this cost you 0$.
___
cisco-nsp mailing
On 23/06/11 00:46, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:36:21PM +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Because it's added only in 15.1(2)T
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/15_1/release/notes
/151-2TNEWF.html#wp43436
Which links here...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer
Because it's added only in 15.1(2)T
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/15_1/release/notes
/151-2TNEWF.html#wp43436
On 22.06.2011 20:17, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
This is the workaround when you can't put the address on the BVI, which
you can't in some cases.
On 22.06.11 22:54, Scott Granados wrote:
Hi, I have a basic question about the Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gigabit interfaces?
What do people find is the average throughput of the gig interfaces? Assuming
normal packet sizes and standard traffic how much milage do you really get out
of these? I'm
If you talking about new licensing scheme, then no 7206VXR use old
licensing scheme same as for 12.4
On 21/06/11 10:45, LM wrote:
Does the 15.x IOS needs the licenses to work under the 7206VXR?
I am a bit confused.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On 21.06.2011 20:12, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 6/21/11 4:18 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 08:41:13PM +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
It's a platform dependent feature, primarily on the newer ISR G2s and
880s/890s. The original ISR's, 870s, 7200 etc have no such
Does anyone know what's up with ipv6 command on Dot11Radio interfaces? I
have CISCO1812W running ADVENTERPRISEK9 15.1(4)M and there no such
command at all. Searching Cisco bug toolkit doesn't reveal any bugs for
me. Software/hardware limitation?
Thanks
On 20.06.2011 22:02, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I believe you have to configure IPv6 for it via a bridge group. I had an
877W a while back with the same problem, but I ended up giving up on it.
I seen this around internet while searching, but some people claim that
this was fixed in 12.4.(22)T and
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo