Thank you to Ian who replied off list with an example of an
unproblematic implementation of exactly this. I'm more calm now. :-)
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 19:09 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
AFAIK, etherchannel will select one physical path per flow (based on
src/dst ip/mac), so there is no out-of-order
Hi,
We have some bandwidth issues between two sites, experiencing out
discards on interfaces.
The connection is currently between 2+2 switchports in WS-X6516-GBIC
cards and they're connected by ~4 km SM connection with LX GBICs. The
redundancy is blocked by STP.
To increase bandwidth in a cost
Peter Rathlev wrote:
As far as I can understand the loadsharing is strictly deterministic, so
out-of-order frames shouldn't be a problem. I assume the switch itself
doesn't care about the difference; we plan to use LACP as we do on all
other etherchannels.
AFAIK, etherchannel will select one
