Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite and IPv6...

2012-04-26 Thread Jeff Kell
AFAIK there is just LAN Base, IP Base, and IP Services now, IPv6 was rolled into IP Services. It was IP Services, 15.0(1). On 4/26/2012 10:03 AM, Dale W. Carder wrote: Was this on advanced ip services or a different license set? Dale Thus spake Jeff Kell (jeff-k...@utc.edu) on Wed, Apr 25,

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite and IPv6...

2012-04-26 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:41:12AM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: AFAIK there is just LAN Base, IP Base, and IP Services now, IPv6 was rolled into IP Services. Didn't they promise us it would be in the same package that has the corresponding IPv4 stuff? So if something is in IP Base for IPv4,

[c-nsp] VRF-Lite and IPv6...

2012-04-25 Thread Jeff Kell
After playing with a lab switch (3560X) today looking at some IPv6 features, we discovered you can't really do IPv6 VRFs on it. The vrf definition configuration option doesn't like address-family at all, so no IPv4/IPv6 bits there. Is this an under consideration software function, or a

[c-nsp] vrf-lite and ipv6 / Cisco 6500/Sup720-3B SXI7

2011-11-21 Thread Sebastian Faerber
Hi, i'm trying to implement vrf-lite and route-leaking to separate some traffic on a 6500/Sup720-3B running 12.2(33)SXI7. What i'm trying to achieve is that all traffic from the customer1 VRF is forced to go out via my default-route, it's ok that incoming traffic is routed directly to the