On 19/11/13 22:51, Tim Durack wrote:
Second that. The more people buy 3rd party (coded if you want) the better.
Vendors only listen to sales.
In fact I would go further. Mandate that the device interoperate with
3rd party optics in your procurement, and have the suppler sign a
contact.
On 11/19/2013 11:57 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
+1 to that. We recently ran across some 3rd-party CODED DOM-supporting
optics that have worked (thus far) in both Ciscos and Brocades. When you
can issue a show int trans and get results from 3rd-parties while Ciscos
remain silent, it speaks volumes
Things will get worse if they start to solder
crytoprocs with mask-programmed vendor-signed certificates
into the gbic/sfp/.. instead of the serial eeprom.
Also the real-time clock helps to limit the lifetime of
devices to just a little longer than warrenty time.
show transceiver lifetime
Jeff,
We have been running 6.2(2) since the summer. In the last six months, I
had to return some third-party Cisco compatible twinax cables because
they were Invalid on our M2s. And, I just had to swap out some
official Cisco SFP-10G-LR because they were version 1 which also do
not work with
On 19/11/2013 13:54, Christina Klam wrote:
We have been running 6.2(2) since the summer. In the last six months, I
had to return some third-party Cisco compatible twinax cables because
they were Invalid on our M2s. And, I just had to swap out some
official Cisco SFP-10G-LR because they were
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:59:06PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
I would love to condemn the product managers who make this sort of
rage-inducing decision to an eternity of dealing with 02:00 maintenance
windows where you're stuck in a data centre with severe time constraints,
the network
Christina, are you running on sup-2E ? We are running many non-CISCO
transceivers on nexus 7k running 6.1.3 but when I did the upgrade to 6.2.2a NO
GOOD.
We also ran across issue with 6.2.2a on sup-2E that you cannot overwrite slot0:
file. Delete but no overwrite. TAC case open.
Jeff
I don’t see the “service unsupported-transceiver” command nor does it run (in
case its hidden). That would imply its not there on 7k 6.1.3 or 6.2.2a.
Can you imagine us doing an upgrade on one of our core 7k and having all the
transceivers fail.
Jeff
On Nov 19, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Gert
Jeff,
They are plain ole N7K-SUP2 with N7K-M224XP-23L line cards. I just
accepted the fact that we will have to pay the Cisco tax.
Regards,
Christina
On 11/19/2013 02:45 PM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater wrote:
Christina, are you running on sup-2E ? We are running many non-CISCO
transceivers on
Did you happen to try to overwrite a slot0:file , even though this is
unrelated to the transceiver issue. In my case its just another bug with
6.2.2a on sup-2E.
Jeff
On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Christina Klam ck...@ias.edu wrote:
Jeff,
They are plain ole N7K-SUP2 with N7K-M224XP-23L
service unsupported-transceiver works for us on 6.2.2a.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
jf...@princeton.eduwrote:
I don’t see the “service unsupported-transceiver” command nor does it run
(in case its hidden). That would imply its not there on 7k 6.1.3 or
6.2.2a.
What sup and what EPLD ver.
Interesting !
Jeff
On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Tim Durack
tdur...@gmail.commailto:tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
service unsupported-transceiver works for us on 6.2.2a.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
My error. Yes it does exist. Not sure what I did wrong.
i am going back and try new code with command.
Thanks
Jeff
On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Tim Durack
tdur...@gmail.commailto:tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
service unsupported-transceiver works for us on 6.2.2a.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at
Just talked to my SE. He reports that, in previous versions, some 3rd party
transceivers (mine included, apparently) work without service
unsupported-transceiver. This was 'fixed' in 6.2(2)...
Thanks for reporting this, Jeff. We'll be upgrading soon and this saved me
from a big headache.
In 6.1.3 I never had to add the command; but now with 6.2.2a I have to.
Are we having fun yet..
Jeff
On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:46 PM, James Slepicka (c-nsp) cisco-...@slepicka.net
wrote:
Just talked to my SE. He reports that, in previous versions, some 3rd party
transceivers (mine
Does the command exist in 6.1(3)? I don't have a box that I can test with.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey G. Fitzwater [mailto:jf...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 3:19 PM
To: James Slepicka (c-nsp)
Cc: Jeffrey G. Fitzwater; Tim Durack; Gert Doering; Christina Klam;
It does accept the command in 6.1.3, but non CISCO transceivers still work
without running it, and its NOT in the config even with the command “show run
all”
if I run the command “no service unsupported-transceiver” and do an interface
SHUT NO SHUT the non CISCO still work.
Hmmm….
So CISCO
On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 19/11/2013 13:54, Christina Klam wrote:
We have been running 6.2(2) since the summer. In the last six months, I
had to return some third-party Cisco compatible twinax cables because
they were Invalid on our M2s. And, I
Second that. The more people buy 3rd party (coded if you want) the better.
Vendors only listen to sales.
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.orgjavascript:;
wrote:
On 19/11/2013 13:54, Christina Klam wrote:
We have
On 11/19/2013 5:51 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
Second that. The more people buy 3rd party (coded if you want) the better.
Vendors only listen to sales.
+1 to that. We recently ran across some 3rd-party CODED DOM-supporting
optics that have worked (thus far) in both Ciscos and Brocades. When
you can
Since CISCO TECH will probably not touch this because its not CISCO, I see if
anybody has solution.
We are running nx-os 6.1.3 on 7k with sup-2E on a new chassis that will go into
production soon. We wanted to run the 6.2.2a to fix some other issues with
logging and found out the channel
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater wrote:
Since CISCO TECH will probably not touch this because its not CISCO, I
see if anybody has solution.
Backing out to 6.1.3 and all comes back to life.
Has anybody else sent his issue with third party transceivers?
I don't know if Cisco's
22 matches
Mail list logo
