Re: [c-nsp] Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever)

2014-02-03 Thread Jared Mauch
On Feb 2, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: Still somewhat of a mystery, as there is no proper twinax standard like there is with 10G-SR, LR, LRM, ER, etc. Just picking one at random from google..

Re: [c-nsp] Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever)

2014-02-03 Thread Michael Loftis
On Monday, February 3, 2014, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On Feb 2, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu javascript:; wrote: Still somewhat of a mystery, as there is no proper twinax standard like there is with 10G-SR, LR, LRM, ER, etc. Just picking one at random

Re: [c-nsp] Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever)

2014-02-02 Thread Jeff Kell
On 2/2/2014 5:49 PM, Murphy-Olson, Daniel E. wrote: Most of the switch vendors have an official compatibility list, but I've found that generally the most common compatibility issue is active vs passive twinax. Brocade edge switches and nics are normally active only, which seems to come