There is indeed an infinite number of functions, or relationships between
natural numbers. I don't think that means that that any one of those
relationships is not computable because it is within the range of infinite
functions. The countable parts of a program can still accept an infinite
Very interesting. Thanks for the insight.
Tim Washington
Interruptsoftware.ca
416.843.9060
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:40 AM, nicolas.o...@gmail.com
nicolas.o...@gmail.com wrote:
There is indeed an infinite number of functions, or relationships between
natural numbers. I don't think that
Hi all, I recently gave a talk at a Toronto Dev Shop, The Jonah
Grouphttp://www.jonahgroup.com/.
It just detailed my experiences, transitioning a Java app to a Clojure app,
and the benefits that accrued to me. I thought it would be nice to share
with the Clojure community. Below is an approximate
Hi,
Great notes. I like a lot.
A few (mostly technical) comments:
Concept of Computation
What does it mean to compute? Turns out this is a complicated question. From
what I can tell, to compute is an actualization (or concrete version) of a
mathematical function. We are swimming in a
Hey Nicolas,
Thanks for the feedback and corrections. I was trying to hone in on OO and
Lisp's model of what it means to compute. While this just served as a
backdrop for the conceptual and code differences between Bkeeping's Java
and Clojure versions, I can see a much deeper analysis happening
