[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-19 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Closing this as the fix is in and will be in the next two week release. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185 ___ cloud

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-18 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @dustymabe I tested this on one of the minnowboards, and it installed and booted fine. Note that, instead of allocating specific bytes for /boot, you can use this KS command: reqpart --add-boot `` To reply, visit the link below or

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-18 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > VM install of Fedora-Atomic-ostree-x86_64-25-20170118.1.iso to a clean LV > succeeds, for both BIOS and UEFI firmware. Using default partitioning, the > required layout is created. Both installations completely startup, I can >

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-18 Thread Chris Murphy
chrismurphy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` VM install of Fedora-Atomic-ostree-x86_64-25-20170118.1.iso to a clean LV succeeds, for both BIOS and UEFI firmware. Using default partitioning, the required layout is created. Both installations completely startup, I can login,

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-18 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` First build is out that contains this fix. Please test: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-25-20170118.1/compose/Atomic/x86_64/iso/ Keep in mind you will need to have a /boot partition in order for this

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-12 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` [here](https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/508) is a pungi rfe that will enable us to get the anaconda update in once it is fixed: @lsedlar is going to work on it tomorrow. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-06 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` >> >> We were also affected by this issue and spent a huge amount of time figuring >> out why the installation fails. Are there any updates from releng? > > hi @nightvisi0n - due to the recent holidays we didn't have much time to

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-06 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > Yeah, merged /boot with ostree doesn't quite work for us yet. See > https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/215 hmm. and that is only an issue on UEFI because I've been doing legacy boot without a /boot partition for a while

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-06 Thread Colin Walters
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Yeah, merged /boot with ostree doesn't quite work for us yet. See https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/215 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-06 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'll note that if I give myself a boot partition (i.e. a filesystem mounted at `/boot`) then things work ok: ```text # Partition info zerombr clearpart --all reqpart part pv.01 --grow volgroup atomicos pv.01 logvol / --size=3000

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-06 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Hey @walters I created an [updates.img](https://dustymabe.fedorapeople.org/fixuefi-updates.img) with your change in it and I'm seeing an issue where the install succeeds but the grub.cfg in the efi partition seems to have the

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-06 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > We were also affected by this issue and spent a huge amount of time figuring > out why the installation fails. Are there any updates from releng? hi @nightvisi0n - due to the recent holidays we didn't have much time to work

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2017-01-04 Thread Basti Endres
sedrubal added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` You can also reproduce this issue by installing fedora atomic in qemu+kvm using UEFI BIOS (edk2-ovmf) ;) `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2016-12-20 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` A new version of anaconda made it to [stable](https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-69bb5a1d7c). It has also been [tagged](https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6568) such that the next isos that are generated should have

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2016-12-09 Thread Colin Walters
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Anaconda PR with updates.img available: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/903 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2016-12-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` FYI walters has opened this upstream issue for this problem: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/issues/900 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable on UEFI`

2016-12-09 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @kushal - can you make sure we have a test for this in the future once this gets fixed. You can use UEFI in KVM/QEMU with `--boot uefi` parameter. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Dusty Mabe
The issue: `November 21 ISO is not bootable` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `walters` by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Colin Walters
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'll take this issue. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > Huh. So that usually works on netinstalls and lives. And /bin/sh does > exist, it's a symlink to bash and /bin/bash does exist also. So I'm > still confused. in this environment bin is a symlink and that symlink isn't set up at

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Murphy
chrismurphy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` [![program.log](/atomic-wg/issue/raw/files/cb8148271c4c88af8e1abebf3d2b725e0f44eaa2ffc65b837c6424c061eb4755-program.log)](/atomic-wg/issue/raw/files/cb8148271c4c88af8e1abebf3d2b725e0f44eaa2ffc65b837c6424c061eb4755-program.log)

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Murphy
chrismurphy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Fedora-Atomic-ostree-x86_64-25-20161207.0.iso in virt-manager set to use UEFI; and default automatic partitioning. program.log 12:04:03,606 INFO program: Running... efibootmgr 12:04:03,647 INFO program: EFI variables are not

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Report from the field: ``` Last night, I'm try to install Fedora 25 atomic host on UEFI notebook. But all the time installation finished with error fail to install bootloader. As I see after this message /mnt/sysimage have no grub

Re: [atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 12/08/2016 02:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Using virt-manager set to use UEFI > > program.log > 12:04:03,606 INFO program: Running... efibootmgr > 12:04:03,647 INFO program: EFI variables are not supported on this system. > 12:04:03,648 DEBUG program: Return code: 2 > 12:04:03,648 INFO

Re: [atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Murphy
Using virt-manager set to use UEFI program.log 12:04:03,606 INFO program: Running... efibootmgr 12:04:03,647 INFO program: EFI variables are not supported on this system. 12:04:03,648 DEBUG program: Return code: 2 12:04:03,648 INFO program: Running... efibootmgr -c -w -L Fedora -d /dev/vda -p 1

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Per atomic-devel list, ISOs are in fact broken for UEFI. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Hmmm. Didn't have issues with 24. Let me retest now that 12/7 is available. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185 ___ cloud

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Colin Walters
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This might be UEFI vs bios - if you're using default virt-manager you get BIOS. Some more info here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_UEFI_with_QEMU `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Kushal Das
kushal added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` It also passed the Automated tests in OpenQA https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora=Atomic=Fedora-Atomic-25-20161121.0=1 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` thanks @miabbott, I also just tried out the latest ISO and it works for me. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185 ___ cloud

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-08 Thread Micah Abbott
miabbott added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I downloaded the Nov 21 ISO from here: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-Atomic-25-20161121.0/Atomic/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-ostree-x86_64-25-20161121.0.iso ...and wrote it to a USB key. Then successfully

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-07 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Aside from the problem with installing, this raises the question of whether anyone other than me is testing ISOs on bare metal at all. Queued for meeting because of this. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

2016-12-07 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` I'm currently testing the November 21 ISOs by installing on my minnowboard cluster. It seems to be the case that these ISOs are not bootable; after getting through most of the install, they give the