Just in case this poor horse isn't suitably beaten yet.
1. Create 4 qcow2 files per
qemu-img create -f qcow2 *.qcow2 120g
Each qcow2 starts out 194K (not preallocated).
q
2. Format each qcow2
mkfs.ext4
mkfs.ext4 -i 4096
mkfs.xfs
mkfs.btrfs
3. mount each fs (mainly to be fair since ext4 does
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 05:17 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> So, just use XFS across the board (plus overlayfs on the persistent
> storage for containers).
Yeah, that's my vote.
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> You'd need to
> run all this by them and see if there's a way to do a mkfs.ext4 -i
> 4096 for just Atomic Host installations, there's no point doing that
> for workstation installations. Or just use XFS.
Another
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Inode exhaustion?
>
> If the installer is going to create the file system used for overlayfs
> backing storage with ext4, that probably means mkfs.ext4 -i 4096 will
> need to be used; so how does that get propagated
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, at 09:57 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>> That is correct, but changing a default like that might be a bad idea.
>> My opinion is that it should happen on a major release boundary.
>
> One thing this
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, at 09:57 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> That is correct, but changing a default like that might be a bad idea.
> My opinion is that it should happen on a major release boundary.
One thing this impacts is the AH partitioning - it no longer makes
sense by default with overlayfs.
On 09/15/2016 04:25 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 14/09/16, Adam Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>>
>>> In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After
>>> discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:47:09PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Seems a little conservative, but I'm not opposed.
> > I've been under the impression that part of the point of the Two Week
> > Release cycle was to be able to deliver new stuff faster and fix
> > issues faster but playing it safe
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:55:16PM +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> For two week atomic we are not tied with the Fedora 25 release cycle. We
> can enable it in our release when we think it is ready for the
> consumers. It does not have to wait F26 release. For example we see it
> is in good condition
On 14/09/16, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >
> > In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After
> > discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend
> > waiting to move to overlayfs as the
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After
>> discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend
>>
On 09/14/2016 02:32 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After
>> discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend
>> waiting to move to overlayfs as
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After
> discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend
> waiting to move to overlayfs as the default in F26.
>
> I think this will work
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After
> discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend
> waiting to move to overlayfs as the default in F26.
>
> I think this will work
In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After
discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend
waiting to move to overlayfs as the default in F26.
I think this will work well because it will give us some time to allow
people to "try" overlayfs in F25 (we
15 matches
Mail list logo