://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Cmake-and-Visual-Studio-platforms-tp7583415p7583436.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
To: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Cmake and Visual Studio platforms
I understand why CMake cannot resolve the issue in a single call to
configure. However...
how tricky/hard/impossible would it be to alter/rape the generate stage of
CMake to handle this issue?
Let's say I wanted to create
in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Cmake-and-Visual-Studio-platforms-tp7583415p7583442.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
If CMake developers say that the code is simply not structured like that, or
it is too much work to rewrite these parts (and a few others that might
depend on it), then I leave this subject be and not bother again with it.
David led the CMake development for years.
John
--
Powered by
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
If CMake developers say that the code is simply not structured like that, or
it is too much work to rewrite these parts (and a few others that might
depend on it), then I leave this subject be and not bother again with
it through.
Good discussion.
Cheers,
David
From: Meteorhead
Sent: March 1, 2013 10:43 AM
To: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Cmake and Visual Studio platforms
Hi David!
We either misunderstand each other, or my knowledge of CMake is too limited,
but let me try
.nabble.com/Cmake-and-Visual-Studio-platforms-tp7583415.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
There are multiple posts in multiple forums asking this question, so
naturally there is public need for this feature. How come CMake never aimed
at creating a solution for this? I suspect there is some great design issue
that prevents implementing it in CMake. There are several platform and
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:31 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
There are multiple posts in multiple forums asking this question, so
naturally there is public need for this feature. How come CMake never aimed
at creating a solution for this? I suspect there is some great design issue