Re: [Commons-l] Photographer Sues for Failure to Provide Creative Commons-Required Attribution–Philpot v. WOS

I went through my list again on Courtlistener (if someone has a PACER account, please contribute more relevant documents). Philpot seems to have rushed to voluntarily dismiss a number of cases at the end of April 2019. Possibly not coincidental, this happened mere days after the judgement in

Re: [Commons-l] Photographer Sues for Failure to Provide Creative Commons-Required Attribution–Philpot v. WOS

Kunal Mehta via Commons-l, 26/06/19 00:28: CC0 licensed music metadata project (Only partially so. Part of their data is unfree: .) Federico ___ Commons-l mailing list

Re: [Commons-l] Photographer Sues for Failure to Provide Creative Commons-Required Attribution–Philpot v. WOS

MusicBrainz (CC0 licensed music metadata project, think Wikidata for music) announced today that they prevailed against Philpot and had a court dismiss the suit with prejudice. Some discussion (including

Re: [Commons-l] Photographer Sues for Failure to Provide Creative Commons-Required Attribution–Philpot v. WOS

That is a long list of sue cases. Philpot, I guess, must be busy in court than actually taking photos anymore!? On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:59 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) via Commons-l < commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote: > See > < >

[Commons-l] Photographer Sues for Failure to Provide Creative Commons-Required Attribution–Philpot v. WOS

See This was briefly discussed also at I tried to make a list of some of Philpot cases