RE: MC Navi 0.2.10 released

2010-07-04 Thread Mike Crash
undrwater wrote: is it possible to add more detail to your map conversion instructions? I have tried several times to do a conversion for portions of the USA without success. I believe the problems I've had relate to the difference between .osm and administrative.osm files.

[QtMoko] Debian version

2010-07-04 Thread MicVM
Hi folks, I was trying to port an application developed with the SHR-toolcahin to qtmoko (debian) and ran into a lot of methods etc. that are not available in debian lenny yet. Is the reasoning behind the choice of debian lenny that it is more stable and hence one less source of possible

Re: [QtMoko] Debian version

2010-07-04 Thread Radek Polak
MicVM wrote: I was trying to port an application developed with the SHR-toolcahin to qtmoko (debian) and ran into a lot of methods etc. that are not available in debian lenny yet. Is the reasoning behind the choice of debian lenny that it is more stable and hence one less source of possible

Re: cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images

2010-07-04 Thread Tha_Man
Hi again, I couldn't resist to do some more testing, so I copied my QtMoko SDcard installation to NAND. QtMoko from NAND boots fine in most cases (see overview), it's suspend and resume that fails when overclocked. However, suspend and resume works fine with the original NAND U-boot and your

cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images

2010-07-04 Thread Gennady Kupava
Hi, I couldn't resist to do some more testing, Thanks for testing :) u-boot.udfu_450_112_1.65_1.9: won't boot (hangs on 'Starting kernel...') u-boot.udfu_450_112_1.7_1.9_sdmax: won't boot (hangs on 'Starting kernel...') As i already told to use 450 or 465 you need kernel patch, and hang in

Re: [QtMoko] Debian version

2010-07-04 Thread Michele Brocco
On 7/4/10, Radek Polak pson...@seznam.cz wrote: MicVM wrote: I was trying to port an application developed with the SHR-toolcahin to qtmoko (debian) and ran into a lot of methods etc. that are not available in debian lenny yet. Is the reasoning behind the choice of debian lenny that it is