/usr/lib/lib** svn .so.0 problem in shr

2009-10-23 Thread Pieter Colpaert
Hi, Many applications (such as elmdentica, intone, ...) need the -ver-svn-02.so.0 version of the libs, so I just link them. Should tis not be automatically integrated into SHR? Just to help people cursing on the type-work I generated this using emacs ;) (I finally start to get the hang of

Re: /usr/lib/lib** svn .so.0 problem in shr

2009-10-23 Thread Marcel
Am Freitag, den 23.10.2009, 18:51 +0200 schrieb Pieter Colpaert: Hi, Many applications (such as elmdentica, intone, ...) need the -ver-svn-02.so.0 version of the libs, so I just link them. Should tis not be automatically integrated into SHR? That'd be really nice ideed! -- Marcel

Re: /usr/lib/lib** svn .so.0 problem in shr

2009-10-23 Thread Al Johnson
On Friday 23 October 2009, Pieter Colpaert wrote: Hi, Many applications (such as elmdentica, intone, ...) need the -ver-svn-02.so.0 version of the libs, so I just link them. Should tis not be automatically integrated into SHR? No, it shouldn't. If the packages are expected to run on shr

Re: /usr/lib/lib** svn .so.0 problem in shr

2009-10-23 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 06:57:18PM +0100, Al Johnson wrote: On Friday 23 October 2009, Pieter Colpaert wrote: Hi, Many applications (such as elmdentica, intone, ...) need the -ver-svn-02.so.0 version of the libs, so I just link them. Should tis not be automatically integrated into SHR?