Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-22 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:52:09 +0900, W.Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 10:04 +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:13:59 +0100 Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster bernd.pruens...@gmail.com babbled: Dylan Reilly schrieb: FWIW, I have been able to reduce

Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-22 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:07:45 -0500 Joel Newkirk freerun...@newkirk.us babbled: On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:52:09 +0900, W.Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 10:04 +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:13:59 +0100 Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster

Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-22 Thread DJDAS
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ha scritto: Billk I've seen Enlightenment running between 18% and 30% most of the time lately, with SHR. And I just discovered I am able to drop it to 3%-5% and bring it back through a single change: I've been tweaking some Oxygen icons and using

Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-22 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:23:42 +1100, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:07:45 -0500 Joel Newkirk freerun...@newkirk.us babbled: On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:52:09 +0900, W.Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 10:04 +1100,

Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-22 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:54:42 -0500 Joel Newkirk freerun...@newkirk.us babbled: On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:23:42 +1100, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:07:45 -0500 Joel Newkirk freerun...@newkirk.us babbled: On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:52:09

[OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-21 Thread Dylan Reilly
FWIW, I have been able to reduce the CPU usage of Enlightenment on my OM testing build device by disabling drop shadows. After recent updates from testing (which should be more or less the 2008.12 image) Enlightenment was constantly grabbing 20% CPU and who knows how much IO. After I obliterated

Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-21 Thread Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster
Dylan Reilly schrieb: FWIW, I have been able to reduce the CPU usage of Enlightenment on my OM testing build device by disabling drop shadows. After recent updates from testing (which should be more or less the 2008.12 image) Enlightenment was constantly grabbing 20% CPU and who knows how much

Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-21 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:13:59 +0100 Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster bernd.pruens...@gmail.com babbled: Dylan Reilly schrieb: FWIW, I have been able to reduce the CPU usage of Enlightenment on my OM testing build device by disabling drop shadows. After recent updates from testing (which

Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-21 Thread Dylan Reilly
I definitely believe that it shouldn't be doing that and it was not always the case. I am certainly willing to accept there is something screwy with my upgrade path, but I did not do anything intentionally to the theme or defendant components. (The only thing that comes to mind that *might* be

Re: [OM 2008.12] Enlightenment Drop Shadow Performance

2008-12-21 Thread W.Kenworthy
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 10:04 +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:13:59 +0100 Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster bernd.pruens...@gmail.com babbled: Dylan Reilly schrieb: FWIW, I have been able to reduce the CPU usage of Enlightenment on my OM testing build device by