Yes, but you can use it only if you promise that you will not show to
others how to use it (NDA)!
So, for me is like it doesn't exist!
IF only we had OpenGL on the Freerunner by now, imagine the amazing
apps we could write .. geeze guys, what a big disappointment the Glamo
is ..
;
--
Jay
Jay Vaughan wrote:
Yes, but you can use it only if you promise that you will not show to
others how to use it (NDA)!
So, for me is like it doesn't exist!
IF only we had OpenGL on the Freerunner by now, imagine the amazing
apps we could write .. geeze guys, what a big disappointment
Agreed. Why does nobody seem to be addressing/acknowledging this issue
(or am I just looking in the wrong places)? An April 2008 post on the
mailing list suggests that SMedia want $15,000 to release the docs
under
NDA to anyone outside of Openmoko employees. If this is the case, and
nobody
Agreed. Why does nobody seem to be addressing/acknowledging this issue
(or am I just looking in the wrong places)? An April 2008 post on the
mailing list suggests that SMedia want $15,000 to release the docs under
NDA to anyone outside of Openmoko employees. If this is the case, and
nobody
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which prompts me to ask: when FIC/OM chose this chip, what was their
plan? they knew that it had IP strings attached, and yet they chose it
anyway. They must have had some kind of plan to make it compatible
with Open
Citando Michele Renda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, I think, making pessure to the firm that produce Glamo, is the only
possibility to get very open our hardware.
Given the legal situation, I agree. Let's pester them with a ton of emails! :)
Maybe we could get the FSF and GNU into this as well? We
Hi folks,
the german online news golem reports about our FR (unfortunaly just in
german language)
http://www.golem.de/0808/61507.html
--
mfg/br, christian
Flurstraße 14
29640 Schneverdingen
Germany
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49 5193 97 14 95
Mobile: +49 171 357 59 57
2008/8/6 Christian Weßel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
the german online news golem reports about our FR (unfortunaly just in
german language)
http://www.golem.de/0808/61507.html
Google translate:
Googles English is horrible. :-)
Am Mittwoch, den 06.08.2008, 07:29 -0400 schrieb Charles Pax:
2008/8/6 Christian Weßel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
the german online news golem reports about our FR (unfortunaly
just in
german language)
This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
So many mistakes. They bought their Freerunner and wrote the review. I
bet they haven't tested it for more than 1 day.
The funniest thing: They say the icons are bad. i.e. the «gears»-Tab
is not for Settings, it's for the favorites menu. Never
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
So many mistakes. They bought their Freerunner and wrote the review. I
bet they haven't tested it for more than 1 day.
Fow how long do you think you should check a device before
writing
Christian Weßel said
Googles English is horrible. :-)
Googles translations are awful in all languages lol
--
Iker Berasaluce
Departamento de Informatica
Fulcrum SA
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:19 +0200, Michele Renda wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
So many mistakes. They bought their Freerunner and wrote
Michele Renda wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
So many mistakes. They bought their Freerunner and wrote the review. I
bet they haven't tested
Yeah, someone who is reviewing this device from the mindset of an end user is
someone who's producing a useless review. It says 'Not for end users' all over
its site long before you try to buy one. Are they writing a review for people
who don't read?
If you ask me, FIC should have shipped
But is it marketed as a phone or not? Yes, it is marketed as a
phone. Thus, to review it as a phone is only fair.
imo the intended audience was not outlined very clear by om, thus the
snafu with end-user vs developer continues.
what turned me off was the point on the gear icon -- there was
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 09:36 -0400, Daniel Benoy wrote:
Yeah, someone who is reviewing this device from the mindset of an end user is
someone who's producing a useless review. It says 'Not for end users' all
over its site long before you try to buy one. Are they writing a review for
people
Christian Weßel, Mittwoch, 6. August 2008:
the german online news golem reports about our FR (unfortunaly just
in german language)
http://www.golem.de/0808/61507.html
This article is not very good. Aside from some wrong facts, it seems a
bit tendentious to me. Such bad press from a very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:19 +0200, Michele Renda wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
Nobody expected from a mobile phone that it
Michele Renda wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:19 +0200, Michele Renda wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
Nobody expected
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 15:19:32 Michele Renda wrote:
I think that before to test something you must to know what are you
testing. You can not to test a phone and than to say:
Oh... it is stupid, it is not able to prepare me a coffee :)
OM is just not there yet. Be fair, no excuses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juergen Schinker wrote:
his Graphics chip-set can do 3D Acceleration AFAIK
Yes, but you can use it only if you promise that you will not show to
others how to use it (NDA)!
So, for me is like it doesn't exist!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
22 matches
Mail list logo
