Norbert Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is exactly the opposite I talked about
Sorry. Didn't read thoroughly.
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
sip:b0ef@ e e
What is qpe exactly doing? I noticed a lot of problems
other people reporting like the no pin dialog. Looking
at the device qpe uses 100% CPU for a long time. I don't
understand it but the CPU usage of qpe is capable to slow
down other things extremely. The SIM Pin dialog is working
with the new
Norbert Hartl wrote:
What is qpe exactly doing? I noticed a lot of problems
other people reporting like the no pin dialog. Looking
at the device qpe uses 100% CPU for a long time. I don't
understand it but the CPU usage of qpe is capable to slow
down other things extremely. The SIM Pin
Thanks Norbert very much for finally finding the real problem with the pin
dialog not appearing! Removing this makes the pin-dialog appear for me with
!!every boot!! now ca. 15-20 sec after x started. Before this patch the
pin-dialog just appeared 1 out of 40 boots! This is a big improvment.
If Qtopia is not allowed to search the SD card, it will not be able to
see/use files on it, so then why have it at all?
wouldn't it be sensible to have some flag or checksum indicating that the
card and it's content are unchanged, thus preventing unnecessary searching?
i do not use qtopia, so
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 21:01 +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
Norbert Hartl wrote:
What is qpe exactly doing? I noticed a lot of problems
other people reporting like the no pin dialog. Looking
at the device qpe uses 100% CPU for a long time. I don't
understand it but the CPU usage of qpe is
Thanks! But your proposal is a bit harsh for me :)
You just need to put 0 to the config items in section SD Card. That
solves it as well.
Norbert
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 13:35 +0200, Rorschach wrote:
Thanks Norbert very much for finally finding the real problem with the pin
dialog not
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 13:41 +0200, arne anka wrote:
If Qtopia is not allowed to search the SD card, it will not be able to
see/use files on it, so then why have it at all?
wouldn't it be sensible to have some flag or checksum indicating that the
card and it's content are unchanged, thus
arne anka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wouldn't it be sensible to have some flag or checksum indicating
that the card and it's content are unchanged
inotify
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i .
wouldn't it be sensible to have some flag or checksum indicating
that the card and it's content are unchanged
inotify
does inotify tell you if the card was manipulated outside the fr?
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 15:01 +0200, arne anka wrote:
wouldn't it be sensible to have some flag or checksum indicating
that the card and it's content are unchanged
inotify
does inotify tell you if the card was manipulated outside the fr?
No, inotify is an observer at runtime.
inotify
does inotify tell you if the card was manipulated outside the fr?
No, inotify is an observer at runtime.
thought so.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 21:01 +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
Norbert Hartl wrote:
What is qpe exactly doing? I noticed a lot of problems
other people reporting like the no pin dialog. Looking
at the device qpe uses 100% CPU for a long time. I don't
understand it but the CPU
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 03:26 +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 21:01 +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
Norbert Hartl wrote:
What is qpe exactly doing? I noticed a lot of problems
other people reporting like the no pin dialog. Looking
at the device qpe uses
14 matches
Mail list logo
